When a reporter asked a multiple part question

[yy4me]

at his press conference, did you notice that our smirker-in-chief almost plotzed! Multiple parts are just too much! He got thru one and admitted that he forgot the other parts. Seem to me that part of the job requirements for "chief honcho" would be the ability to remember more that one thing at a time. Good grief, what have the American people brought upon themselves?

[shoelace414]

1. Whenever they ask a multi part or long question

he takes the words.. answers something different, and calls on the next reporter.

[NewJeffCT]

2. next thing you know

A reporter will ask a foreign dignitary a question in, gasp, their language!

[Divernan]

3. What's the opposite of multi-tasking?

nt

[PunkPop]

4. Uni-tasking?

[tridim]

7. He can't uni-task either

The opposite is more like zero-task or braindead. Both of which describe * perfectly.

[PunkPop]

9. Non-tasking

Yes, that's it.

[fob]

8. bushi-tasking* aka bushit-asking*

[BlueEyedSon]

10. LMAO!

[Nite Owl]

5. He can't handle it

Sure makes you long for President Clinton.

[Canuckistanian]

6. Clinton could rmember every question

And probably give a multi-part aswer to every point. AND it would be obvious that he knew his subject well.

* shows no knowledge of any subject in depth and just tries to inject as many "happy-words" into his answers that he can, while evading the main point of the question.