Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Decision won't be made on moving "Camp Casey" for FOUR WEEKS! Bwahaha!

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Bush_Eats_Beef Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-16-05 12:35 PM
Original message
Decision won't be made on moving "Camp Casey" for FOUR WEEKS! Bwahaha!
http://www.salon.com/politics/war_room/index.html?blog=/politics/war_room/2005/08/16/sheehan/index.html

It gets ugly in Crawford

We thought the blowback against Cindy Sheehan hit rock bottom when Bill O'Reilly suggested that her vigil in Crawford, Texas, "borders on treasonous" and Michelle Malkin offered up the view that Sheehan's dead son wouldn't approve. Then we thought it couldn't get any worse when the president of the United States said he couldn't take the time to meet with Sheehan because his exercise schedule was more important.

We were wrong. On Monday night, a driver in a pickup truck rammed through rows of white crosses Sheehan and her supporters have placed across a road near the president's Crawford ranch. So much for supporting the troops: The crosses bore the names of soldiers who were killed in the war in Iraq. Monday night's incident was just the latest sign that things are getting ugly in Crawford. Over the weekend, one of Bush's neighbors fired a shotgun in the air as Sheehan and her supporters began a prayer service. He said he was getting ready to hunt doves. And according to a Bloomberg News report, some of Bush's Crawford neighbors plan to go to court in Waco today to seek an order prohibiting anyone from parking or stopping on roads near Bush's ranch.

The neighbors' efforts could run into a roadblock stronger than the white crosses that once stretched across the roadway. It's called the U.S. Constitution, the First Amendment to which protects the right of the people "to petition the government for a redress of grievances."

Update: Although Bloomberg said that Bush's neighbors intended to go to court to stop Sheehan's protests, the neighbors actually filed a petition today with local county commissioners, the Associated Press is reporting. In their petition, they seek to have an existing no-parking zone around Bush's ranch extended so far that any protestors would be forced to relocate to the town of Crawford, about seven miles away. The commission said it would hold a public hearing on the request in about four weeks -- in other words, after the president's five-week vacation has ended.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Burried News Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-16-05 12:37 PM
Response to Original message
1. Welcome to the Green Zone George.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ronnykmarshall Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-16-05 12:38 PM
Response to Original message
2. It may be a mute point ..
There's a story floating around that a neighbor is offering Cindy to use his land for Camp Casey.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bush_Eats_Beef Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-16-05 12:39 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. Yes, I posted that story this morning:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
moc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-16-05 12:42 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. I think there's a safety issue involved.
Plowing down crosses today, plowing down a person tomorrow. I think if they're given a chance to move onto that property, they should.

However, that won't solve the congestion problem. Hundreds of cars will still be parked along the road.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lerkfish Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-16-05 12:45 PM
Response to Reply #3
7. well, there MIGHT be some advantage to a larger area, for one thing
shrug
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
maxsolomon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-16-05 12:44 PM
Response to Reply #2
6. i'm sorry: MOOT
Edited on Tue Aug-16-05 12:44 PM by maxsolomon
MOOT point.

its a peeve, and i can't stop myself.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lerkfish Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-16-05 12:46 PM
Response to Reply #6
8. I think you're going to loose that argument
I should tell you on site that you will.


:evilgrin:

(those are MY two biggest peeves: Loose (lose) and site (sight).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ronnykmarshall Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-16-05 12:50 PM
Response to Reply #6
9. Okey I'll do betters next tyme.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
uppityperson Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-16-05 12:51 PM
Response to Reply #9
11. me to
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Blue_In_AK Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-16-05 02:07 PM
Response to Reply #6
13. Thanks, it kind of peeves me a little, too...
...petty as it seems. :shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
havocmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-16-05 12:40 PM
Response to Original message
4. Sounds like the movers & shakers in Crawford are not real fond of W either
Sounds like they understand how government is supposed to work: it does not hop-to when some special interest group says "jump".

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
uppityperson Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-16-05 12:50 PM
Response to Original message
10. snort. Good for them that will hold a public hearing.
ha
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Contrary1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-16-05 01:05 PM
Response to Original message
12. It seems to me that Smirk himself
Edited on Tue Aug-16-05 01:07 PM by Contrary1
could speed up the hearing process, if he so desired.

After all, he is the big cheese, ain't he? The "leader" of
the most powerful country on earth. Could be that he
requested the delay, because it could get really ugly if
the peace activists (not protesters) were forced out, for
whatever reason.

Look for the new parking regulation to go into effect once
this is over. By "over", I am referring to location only. This
movement is just getting started. And it's long overdue.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat Apr 20th 2024, 05:07 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC