Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

The baby Jesus may have been born of immaculate conception....

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
paineinthearse Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-19-05 10:01 AM
Original message
The baby Jesus may have been born of immaculate conception....
By email.

"The baby Jesus may have been born of immaculate conception. The information leaked to Robert Novak and Matthew Cooper and others that Valerie Plame was employed by the CIA had a more earthly origin."

Murray Waas, 8/18/05
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
displacedtexan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-19-05 10:04 AM
Response to Original message
1. Murray needs to go back to Sunday School.
Immaculate conception refers to God's declaration that Mary was born without sin.

Virgin birth refers to the birth of Jesus.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KC21304 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-19-05 10:07 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. You beat me to it. But 95 % of people get it wrong.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
happyslug Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-19-05 10:20 AM
Response to Reply #1
3. For the purpose of that comment the Difference is unimportant.
SOMEONE TOLD NOVAK AND Novak is NO shepherd guarding his flock when an Angel appeared to him and spoke. Nor is he a Wise-man who saw the "Star" in the East and acted. No SOMEONE LIVING ON THIS EARTH TOLD NOVAK and that person should be in Jail.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
paineinthearse Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-19-05 03:20 PM
Response to Reply #3
7. That is the point.
Waas may not be completely correct in his theology, thank you for seeing his point.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bassic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-19-05 11:37 AM
Response to Reply #1
4. I was always taught the opposite
Edited on Fri Aug-19-05 11:37 AM by Bassic
That the immaculate conception refered to the conception of Jesus because it did not require a sin (i.e. having sex) and Jesus was born free of the original sin (is taht what it's called in English?)

I was taught that both in church (Catholic) and in religion classes (also Catholic).

Edit: Typos
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
displacedtexan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-19-05 02:31 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. Catholic.com is a great resource.
I have an undergrad minor in Religion from Texas Christian University. I've always been fascinated by religious history.

From Catholic.com...
The Immaculate Conception


It’s important to understand what the doctrine of the Immaculate Conception is and what it is not. Some people think the term refers to Christ’s conception in Mary’s womb without the intervention of a human father; but that is the Virgin Birth. Others think the Immaculate Conception means Mary was conceived "by the power of the Holy Spirit," in the way Jesus was, but that, too, is incorrect. The Immaculate Conception means that Mary, whose conception was brought about the normal way, was conceived without original sin or its stain—that’s what "immaculate" means: without stain. The essence of original sin consists in the deprivation of sanctifying grace, and its stain is a corrupt nature. Mary was preserved from these defects by God’s grace; from the first instant of her existence she was in the state of sanctifying grace and was free from the corrupt nature original sin brings.

When discussing the Immaculate Conception, an implicit reference may be found in the angel’s greeting to Mary. The angel Gabriel said, "Hail, full of grace, the Lord is with you" (Luke 1:28). The phrase "full of grace" is a translation of the Greek word kecharitomene. It therefore expresses a characteristic quality of Mary.

The traditional translation, "full of grace," is better than the one found in many recent versions of the New Testament, which give something along the lines of "highly favored daughter." Mary was indeed a highly favored daughter of God, but the Greek implies more than that (and it never mentions the word for "daughter"). The grace given to Mary is at once permanent and of a unique kind. Kecharitomene is a perfect passive participle of charitoo, meaning "to fill or endow with grace." Since this term is in the perfect tense, it indicates that Mary was graced in the past but with continuing effects in the present. So, the grace Mary enjoyed was not a result of the angel’s visit. In fact, Catholics hold, it extended over the whole of her life, from conception onward. She was in a state of sanctifying grace from the first moment of her existence.

http://www.catholic.com/library/Immaculate_Conception_and_Assum.asp
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Felix Mala Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-19-05 02:59 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. Isn't the whole idea of Mary's innocence messed up if she had
children before or after Jesus the usual way? Doesn't that mess up all of this mumbo jumbo?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
happyslug Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-19-05 06:29 PM
Response to Reply #6
8. Yes, but Catholic Doctrine rejects her having any other Children
As to Jesus having "Brothers" the term "Brothers" includes 1/2 siblings (i.e. male sons to one father but different mothers). Legend holds that Joseph had been married before and thus James, Jesus's Brother was his older brother to another woman (Notice I say legend, this is NOT even mentioned in the Bible).

But this is getting off the subject which is NOVAK was informed by a HUMAN source, he is NOT saying he heard voices in the night, an angel appeared before him or he was checking Plame's husband's Astrology chart and found out Plame worked for the CIA.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TNMOM Donating Member (735 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-19-05 07:55 PM
Response to Reply #5
11. yeah, whatever... so DID she, or did she NOT conceive out of wedlock?
Bottom line: if Catholics think she's sinless, then she had to have conceived without the intervention of man. Otherwise, she'd be a sinner having had premarital intercourse.

I was raised Baptist, and they always drilled into us that Mary was not perfect (as the Catholics say), but she was human (a sinner) and that she did indeed get pregnant via holy spirit.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
msongs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-19-05 06:34 PM
Response to Original message
9. god committed adultery with mary. she had a husband. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MaineDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-19-05 06:40 PM
Response to Reply #9
10. I thought they married while she was with child
They were just betrothed when the angel came to spring the news on her.

(Somewhere a nun is getting ready to rap my knuckles. I can just tell.)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jackpine Radical Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-19-05 08:42 PM
Response to Original message
12. Jesus H. Christ.
Somebody posts a smartass throwaway remark from Murray Waas & the whole thread turns into a humorless theological debate.

There's so much excess erudition around here that we oughtta start selling it to diploma mill PhD candidates in search of dissertations.

I'm taking bets on how many responses I get on whether Jesus' middle initial was H.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 19th 2024, 10:37 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC