Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Anyone else starting to think the Roberts nomination is a red herring?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
HardWorkingDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-20-05 12:08 AM
Original message
Anyone else starting to think the Roberts nomination is a red herring?
Edited on Sat Aug-20-05 12:37 AM by HardWorkingDem
I'm almost wondering if this man was nominated to instead pave the way for a more controversial nomination. For example, at first look he seems to be a less worrisome Republican than some of Bush's other favorites and if his nomination is derailed, then the Bushies will be able to come back with, "Look at Roberts. He was the most non-ideological person we could find and the Democrats didn't even like him. If it's a Republican, they can't be satisfied."

Or, if Roberts was meant to take the fight out of a more controversial candidate.

Thoughts?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
fearnobush Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-20-05 12:11 AM
Response to Original message
1. I think he is a shoe in because I believe the Dems know this and
that the freeper types so call rally against him are also part of this red herring to get Dems to fight his nomination - won't work because at the end of the day he will get the nod.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
punpirate Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-20-05 12:14 AM
Response to Original message
2. Don't think so...
... he's part of an overall plan which is comfortable for both the right wing and the traditional conservatives. In that sense, he's a good pick for Bush--highly pro-business and steathily anti-abortion.

Having another authoritarian who takes the Bush administration's side, and the side of business, reliably, is a sound pick for them, no matter how he is viewed on his public comments on abortion. The agenda is corporate control of the country. Any other inclinations on Roberts' part is just icing on the cake.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Old and In the Way Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-20-05 12:15 AM
Response to Original message
3. The nominee no-one likes.
I'm trying to figure out if the Right is bluffing on their unhappiness or not. I'd like to see the Democrats fight him....and every single nominee Bush puts up, because none will be balanced.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
femrap Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-20-05 12:16 AM
Response to Original message
4. The only way there is a nomination more ....
conservative is if W. nominates a member of the KKK....david duke?

I know the guy 'looks' harmless enough which is part of the problem....but please THINK....this man is extremely dangerous.

Geez. Now I start to get all paranoid about people on DU ..... W. has nominated a man who is called 'johnny bob TALIBAN'.....how much more conservative can we go???? Dobson loves him...Robertson, too. Family Research Council is enthralled over the nomination.....!!!!!!!

Pleeeez....what do you mean???? A red herring????
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
femrap Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-20-05 12:21 AM
Response to Reply #4
5. Forgot to add...
that some of the real crazies led the way....Pryor, Owens and Rogers-Brown.

These loony bins make Roberts look 'logical.'

Please don't be taken in by the neocons....they have set a lovely stage.

My line in the sand has been drawn over johnny bob Taliban...if the Dems don't fight him (when have they fought yet since '04 Elections?), I will leave the Party...and work grassroots on THE ISSUES.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Trillo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-20-05 03:58 AM
Response to Original message
6. I think the most important thing is to force FULL DISCLOSURE
Edited on Sat Aug-20-05 04:12 AM by SimpleTrend
instead of partial disclosure of all his writings. It's what the corporatist has mandated for, and profited from, the rest of us plebes.

Is this another red herring?

Lots of edits.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat Apr 20th 2024, 06:44 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC