Bush_Eats_Beef
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Aug-20-05 08:35 AM
Original message |
CA, TX, NY, PA, OH: States with highest U.S. military casualties in Iraq |
GOPisEvil
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Aug-20-05 08:37 AM
Response to Original message |
1. Yeah, but those are 5 of the most populous states. |
|
What about casualties per capita? :shrug:
|
MADem
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Aug-20-05 08:40 AM
Response to Reply #1 |
2. That was my question, as well |
|
Losses as a percentage of the total population....??? All politics IS local, and the impact can be just as great, if not greater, when small towns are impacted.
|
bnr65432
(133 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Aug-20-05 11:28 AM
Response to Reply #2 |
|
i agree 100% with your post
|
acmejack
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Aug-20-05 08:43 AM
Response to Reply #1 |
3. Apparently us Austin folks think the same way! |
|
You beat me to that same comment. Thinking like me could be a very bad sign for you, I suggest seeking professional help quickly!
|
alcibiades_mystery
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Aug-20-05 08:44 AM
Response to Reply #1 |
4. I'd imagine that Georgia has to pretty damn high per capita |
|
45 killed from GA? Doesn't Georgia only have like 7 million people in the whole state?
|
gratuitous
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Aug-20-05 09:34 AM
Response to Reply #4 |
5. Yeah, I'd be interested in per capita as well |
|
Oregon has fewer than 3 million residents and 34 killed.
But we did vote for John Kerry and Al Gore before him, so there's that . . .
|
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Fri Apr 19th 2024, 07:52 AM
Response to Original message |