Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Good news for Democrats in 2006

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
gokar Donating Member (96 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-20-05 08:56 PM
Original message
Good news for Democrats in 2006
Edited on Sat Aug-20-05 09:00 PM by gokar
I just read through the approval ratings of all 100 senators.
There are NO democrats on that list with less than 50% ratings.
But there are a few republicans! The most vulnerable is Rick
Santorum of PA. And Mel Martinez of FL is not far behind.

On edit...link added.

http://www.surveyusa.com/100USSenators0805SortedbyState.htm
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Deja Q Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-20-05 08:58 PM
Response to Original message
1. Well, if that remains true in late October 2006, then I will feel assured.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gokar Donating Member (96 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-21-05 12:14 AM
Response to Reply #1
5. It will be looking even better by 2006 due to Iraq and Oil prices!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SoCalifer Donating Member (652 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-20-05 08:59 PM
Response to Original message
2. Rick Santorum
Edited on Sat Aug-20-05 09:00 PM by SoCalifer

You mean the sick dead fetus kissing Necro?

That man is really sick.. Hope PA fires him..


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Peggy Day Donating Member (859 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-20-05 09:16 PM
Response to Original message
3. until the voting machines are fixed properly
it doesn't matter-they will steal it if they can't win it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gokar Donating Member (96 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-21-05 12:16 AM
Response to Reply #3
6. If they could steal at will, no democrats would have won in 2004,
which was not the case. I do not see vote fraud as a factor unless
the election is close.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lone_Star_Dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-20-05 09:37 PM
Response to Original message
4. List of Senators up for reelection w/approval ratings
This is poorly formatted but I think they are all on here.

Democratic Senators up for reelection in 2006
State Name Party Approval% Disapproval% Net Approval%

HI Akaka, Daniel D JR 56% 32% 24%

NM Bingaman, Jeff D JR 59% 26% 33%

WV Byrd, Robert D SR 65% 29% 36%

WA Cantwell, Maria D JR 47% 37% 10%

NY Clinton, Hillary D JR 61% 35% 26%

DE Carper, Thomas D JR 66% 22% 44%

ND Conrad, Kent D SR 69% 25% 44%

NJ Corzine, Jon D SR 46% 40% 6%

CA Feinstein, Dianne D SR 54% 34% 20%

MA Kennedy, Edward D SR 61% 33% 28%

WI Kohl, Herb D SR 55% 33% 22%

CT Lieberman, Joseph D JR 68% 24% 44%

FL Nelson, Bill D SR 48% 31% 17%

NE Nelson, Ben D JR 63% 27% 36%

MI Stabenow, Debbie D JR 46% 38% 8%




Republican Senators

VA Allen, George R JR 52% 33% 19%

MT Burns, Conrad R JR 48% 42% 6%

RI Chafee, Lincoln R JR 55% 37% 18%

OH DeWine, Mike R SR 42% 43% -1%

NV Ensign, John R JR 53% 31% 22%

TN Frist, Bill R SR 49% 41% 8%

UT Hatch, Orrin R SR 55% 33% 22%

TX Hutchison, Kay R SR 57% 29% 28%

AZ Kyl, Jon R JR 49% 33% 16%

MS Lott, Trent R JR 60% 32% 28%

IN Lugar, Richard R SR 59% 27% 32%

PA Santorum, Rick R JR 42% 46% -4%

ME Snowe, Olympia R SR 77% 18% 59%

MO Talent, Jim R JR 48% 39% 9%

WY Thomas, Craig R SR 60% 25% 35%

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gokar Donating Member (96 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-21-05 12:18 AM
Response to Reply #4
7. MT, OH, PA look like good pick offs from the repuglicans...n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rumpel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-21-05 12:22 AM
Response to Original message
8. Boxer only 49% ? How are they conducting the survey....
Edited on Sun Aug-21-05 12:28 AM by rumpel
on edit

Wow, they are quite detailed in their analysis
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rumpel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-21-05 12:35 AM
Response to Original message
9. Look also at the Bush support by State
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gokar Donating Member (96 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-21-05 10:41 PM
Response to Reply #9
10. WOW Bush is lower in Ohio than Illinois
:-)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr 24th 2024, 01:42 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC