Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Scarborough just pissed on NO pet rescue

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Bush_Eats_Beef Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-05-05 09:34 PM
Original message
Scarborough just pissed on NO pet rescue
"All over New Orleans, they're out trying to rescue PETS...PERSONALLY, I'm wondering why they aren't trying to rescue HUMAN BEINGS...they could use THAT, couldn't they?"

Hmmm...why don;t you ask BUSH why no one was out trying to rescue human beings, BITCH?

:grr:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
sniffa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-05-05 09:35 PM
Response to Original message
1. yeah, save the pets, screw the humans
:eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
saracat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-05-05 09:37 PM
Original message
Pets are just as important. They truly didn't have a choice.
In some cases as in Bush's, I would definately save Barny first! And where is it written you shouldn't save both? Are you sugestting the ASPCA should save the humans? What is FEMA for????
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
expatriot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-05-05 10:00 PM
Response to Reply #1
21. Rescuer carries kid - kid holds onto 1 lb. dog. - problem solved
They are FORCING people to abandon their pets. small pets, etc. My wife came home bawling yesterday from work after hearing an NPR story in which the audio from a child being forced to drop his pet and the cries of this child for "Snowball! Snowball!" and how the child started throwing up. Or the story of the woman who was so desperate to be allowed to take her dog that she offered the Marines her wedding ring, her grandmother's wedding ring but they refused.

Or these storiesfrom the Human Society of the US.

Or the CNN footage that is on their site about how their are "many people" who are refusing to abandon their pets, including this one man they interview, he is floating in the water on a tire. and they leave him even they were on a boat and had plenty of room to hold the dog.

Where is our humanity?

Mahatma Gandhi said it best:
"The greatness of a nation and its moral progress can be judged by the way its animals are treated."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lorien Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-05-05 10:29 PM
Response to Reply #1
29. When people won't leave without their pets
because they are the only family they have, they damn well BETTER save the pets!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bluebear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-05-05 11:09 PM
Response to Reply #29
34. You're damn right.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TankLV Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-06-05 11:57 PM
Response to Reply #29
61. You got that right!
I would never ever abandone my 3 golden boys and girl.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bluebear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-05-05 11:10 PM
Response to Reply #1
35. That's what you got out of that post?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
saracat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-05-05 09:36 PM
Response to Original message
2. Fuck you Scarborough. Pets are important to.o
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Teaser Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-05-05 09:36 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. Not to me.
Not one manhour of a rescuers should be used to save pets, unless some are come across incidentally.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bush_Eats_Beef Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-05-05 09:37 PM
Response to Reply #3
6. So people in the Humane Society shouldn't rescue pets?
:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
saracat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-05-05 09:41 PM
Response to Reply #3
9. What an inhumane attitude. Thank fully most do no think like this. Even
the Coast Guard are letting peopkle take their dogs off the roof with them. For most of us pets are "family" and I would no more sentence them to death than a child. They are true innocents.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
win_in_06 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-06-05 08:52 AM
Response to Reply #9
46. Ironic that you use the word humane while referring to animals.
The priority has to go to people, not pets. When space and time is limited how can you justify saving Fido when a man or woman could die?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LostinVA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-06-05 09:18 AM
Response to Reply #46
48. The definition of humane, since you don;'t seem to know it:
Edited on Tue Sep-06-05 09:18 AM by LostinVA
Main Entry: hu·mane
Pronunciation: hyü-'mAn, yü-
Function: adjective
Etymology: Middle English humain
1 : marked by compassion, sympathy, or consideration for humans or animals


There has been plenty of room in boats, choppers, etc.... the authorities just don't give a damn. However, I know at least one Coast Guard rescuer not only allowed, but took it upon himself to make sure pets were rescued, too. Pets are family members. To some of us, they are our kids. Sorry you can't find it within yourself to be humane and understand this.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
expatriot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-05-05 09:42 PM
Response to Reply #3
11. You could do both if more people had more compassion.
Remember Snowball!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lindacooks Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-05-05 09:44 PM
Response to Reply #3
13. I sure hope you don't have any pets.
Doesn't sound like you appreciate them, at any rate.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-05-05 10:20 PM
Response to Reply #3
27. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
T Town Jake Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-06-05 10:38 AM
Response to Reply #27
55. Ah, such "progressive" sentiments...
..."I rather have my dog for company than some stupid useless man, which most men are!"

A little noun tweaking:

I rather have my dog for company than some stupid useless woman, which most women are!

And there ya are! This post now accepts flames!

:eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lorien Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-05-05 10:27 PM
Response to Reply #3
28. Well aren't you a freakin humanitarian.
:eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TankLV Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-06-05 11:59 PM
Response to Reply #28
62. Disgusting is more like it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bush_Eats_Beef Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-05-05 10:41 PM
Response to Reply #3
30. Say something clever about this.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LisaL Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-05-05 11:10 PM
Response to Reply #3
36. You haven't got a clue either.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LostinVA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-06-05 06:20 AM
Response to Reply #3
43. Then the rescuers should allow people to take their pets!
THey are FAMILY members, not some bloody sofa or piece of bric-brac. But a living, breathing FAMILY MEMBER.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
renie408 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-06-05 09:46 AM
Response to Reply #3
53. Then I don't think YOU should rescue any pets.
But the people to whom animals are very important, THEY should rescue pets.

Do I think that the available National Gaurd should spend time rescuing pets? Probably not. But there are several animal rescue associations that are doing their thing and rightly so. Everybody has to take care of the things that THEY see. You see people. Good, people need help. Some others see pets. Good, pets need help.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
candy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-05-05 09:40 PM
Response to Reply #2
8. Some are refusing to leave without their pets-- neither would I.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
saracat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-05-05 09:42 PM
Response to Reply #8
10. I wouldn't either. They are my furbabies.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LostinVA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-06-05 06:23 AM
Response to Reply #10
44. Me too -- they are our children
I love them, and would stay with them and die if I had to. People who can't understand this need to substitute "mother," "child," "husband," whatever for "fur baby." That's what these furry little critters are to us. And, if you think that's weird or sick, then to hell with you. You have a hole in your soul.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
expatriot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-05-05 09:46 PM
Response to Reply #8
14. My wife and I would not go either.
We have cried a lot from all the human and animal suffering. When humans are treated worse than animals should be treated, animals become nothing to people. :cry:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bush_Eats_Beef Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-05-05 09:47 PM
Response to Reply #14
18. I wouldn't leave without my pet either...
...and I could give a flying fuck for anyone who disagrees with that.

Sometimes DU amazes me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
saracat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-05-05 11:11 PM
Response to Reply #18
37. Me too! There are some people I would never want to know.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hlthe2b Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-05-05 09:48 PM
Response to Reply #8
20. Absolutely... how could one live out their life without grief...
knowing they'd left their beloved pet, who is totally dependent on them for their survival. Better to die along with them, in my opinion.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lecky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-05-05 11:39 PM
Response to Reply #8
40. I wouldn't either...
...in fact I tear up just thinking about it. My 2 dogs are like my babies, they depend on me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
win_in_06 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-06-05 08:54 AM
Response to Reply #8
47. Those that refuse to leave without their pets do so at their own
risk. If they are willing to die for their pet that is their choice.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LostinVA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-06-05 09:20 AM
Response to Reply #47
49. You're just full of compassion and love for everything
Aren't you? Why are you going out of your way to be nasty and insulting to us about this? I'm not being contentious, just curious. I really want to know, because I can't understand this.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
win_in_06 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-06-05 10:42 PM
Response to Reply #49
57. I'm just saying we have to prioritize. We even prioritize with people,
Sick, elderly and children before able-bodied adults, for example.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pharlo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-06-05 11:31 PM
Response to Reply #57
59. Well now, that sentiment is not employing your
cold calculating philosophy to maximum advantage.

Able bodied adults should be rescued first - they're more crucial to the cleanup/rebuilding efforts. Sick and elderly are going to die anyhow, just leave them, and as for the children - well, if they can make it too an evac. zone on their own impetus, well, then we can find a spot on the plane or helo for them. :sarcasm:

There are people who go into disaster areas SPECIFICALLY for animal rescue. And, unlike OFFICIAL human rescue efforts who leave animals to die, they don't leave drowning humans in front of them to die.

They will at least HELP a fellow sufferring creature.

But, their PRIMARY reason for being there is ANIMAL rescue. That's their specialty. That's what they do.

And while your at it, consider this: When was the last time you heard of a search and rescue dog refusing to go somewhere to help save the life of a human - even if it put their own life in peril?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TankLV Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-07-05 12:01 AM
Response to Reply #47
63. Some of us have enough love to go around for ALL.
If we love one, doesn't mean we can't love as many others as are out there.

"as you do to the least of you, you do for me"

I am glad I DON'T know you. I certainly wouldn't want to with an attitude like that!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GRLMGC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-05-05 09:37 PM
Response to Original message
4. Uh
they're saving humans too. Scarborough is an asshole
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LittleClarkie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-06-05 11:48 PM
Response to Reply #4
60. Yeah, like if they find a pet and a human they're going to leave the human
and rescue the pet.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
napi21 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-05-05 09:37 PM
Response to Original message
5. Well Joe, good people can do both!!!!
What an AH!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DELUSIONAL Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-05-05 09:47 PM
Response to Reply #5
17. BINGO!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
expatriot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-05-05 09:39 PM
Response to Original message
7. Compassion, many people in New Orleans have it, why don't you Scarborough?
Edited on Mon Sep-05-05 09:40 PM by expatriot
Refusing to Leave Them Behind, Evacuees Smuggled Their Pets Out With Them

Black Bag Operation

Moret Williams and Sebastian left New Orleans together. Sebastian floated on an air mattress at his owner’s side as Moret Williams waded through polluted, neck-deep floodwater, pulling the mattress along with him. Man and beast managed to reach an elevated portion of Interstate 10, but the helicopters that were taking evacuees to buses weren’t allowing pets on board.

“There was no way I was leaving without him,” Moret Williams says, and so he did what so many have had to do in the past week: He improvised. He put Sebastian in a large black trash bag and begged him not to make noise.

Amazingly, the dog obeyed, though he did squirm at one point—a point that could have ruined the whole plan. “He bumped against the pilot,” Moret Williams says, a small smile creeping onto his face. “The pilot just goes, ‘I didn’t see nothing.’ ”

The pet owner’s black bag operation was secret enough to get the pair a one-way ticket to Houston on a bus that also didn’t accept animals. Sebastian made the whole trip with his nose sticking out the top of the bag. And when they arrived at the Astrodome on Friday, the staff of the Houston SPCA were waiting, ready to offer shelter to Sebastian while Moret Williams became one more evacuee looking to scratch out a new life. Today, he has plans to stay with his sister—and thanks to the SPCA, he has his baby back.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LisaL Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-05-05 11:05 PM
Response to Reply #7
31. That's a smart guy.
We used to put a little baby coat on our dog to sneak her in a subway.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rox63 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-05-05 09:42 PM
Response to Original message
12. The Humane Society and SPCA are rescuing pets
That's what they do, and I support them for doing it. I'd be frantic if I had to leave my two cats behind. There are lots of other folks rescuing the people.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
brentspeak Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-05-05 09:46 PM
Response to Original message
15. Rescuing pets at this point is also a public health issue
In addition to the human bodies, thousands of rotting animal carcasses lying around the city creates limitless possibilities for disease.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
expatriot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-05-05 09:48 PM
Response to Reply #15
19. It is also a mental/emotional health issue
I know that many people are being driven insane with the lack of compassion being displayed by our leaders in Washington and the racist minority in this country.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hlthe2b Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-05-05 09:47 PM
Response to Original message
16. I'd save a fuckin pet alligator before I'd save some of these RW
assholes....Damn them all to hell.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
shireen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-05-05 10:04 PM
Response to Reply #16
22. oh! You're captured my sentiments so eloquently!!! And wild allys too! n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lecky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-05-05 11:43 PM
Response to Reply #16
41. lol that was funny n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ElsewheresDaughter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-06-05 10:52 AM
Response to Reply #16
56. yeah how about rescueing dead interns out of your congressional office joe
Edited on Tue Sep-06-05 10:53 AM by ElsewheresDaughter
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TankLV Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-07-05 12:06 AM
Response to Reply #56
64. If he didn't kill her in the first place.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tabasco Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-05-05 10:10 PM
Response to Original message
23. What about his cousins?
The pigs??
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Justice Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-05-05 10:12 PM
Response to Original message
24. Last thing we want are hungry dogs roaming streets when flood
waters recede. It is good they are saving pets, but also safer for humans that they are doing so!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
iamjoy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-05-05 10:17 PM
Response to Original message
25. I Hugged My Kitties
when I first read about pets being abandoned, much to their chagrin.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
saracat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-05-05 11:08 PM
Response to Reply #25
32. Giggle. I did that too. Several time. My cats are not too thrilled either
but they tolerate it. I remind them how lucky we are!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LostinVA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-06-05 06:25 AM
Response to Reply #32
45. Me too! I cuddled with them on the floor and kissed their
Furry little bellies and toes... they were like, "Mommers! WTF? Stop! I'm trying to watch the deer outside!"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Contrary1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-05-05 10:17 PM
Response to Original message
26. My neighbor asked why I feel compelled to take in the stray cats and dogs
and feed and take care of them. My answer...I like animals better than I like some people.

This whole thing is so sad. For many, all they have left is their pet. I believe that taking them away will actually cause more people to die. If the pets couldn't go to Texas, they should have allowed some of the volunteers to take them. At least there would have been
a chance, however remote; for them to be reunited eventually.

If ASPCA, the Humane Society, or any animal activist group wants to go in and rescue whatever creatures they can, I'm all for it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LisaL Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-05-05 11:09 PM
Response to Original message
33. He hasn't got a clue. Or a heart. People refuse to leave
because they can't take pets.
How hard it is to understand that pets are family too?
It's an outrage that people are forced to leave their pets behind.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
zulchzulu Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-05-05 11:12 PM
Response to Original message
38. Rescuing interns from being murdered in campaign offices would be cool too
Hey Joe...what did you do with that dead intern of the floor.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lecky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-05-05 11:33 PM
Response to Original message
39. I'm glad there are organizations out there rescuing pets
I know I would be going out of my mind with worry about any pets I had to leave behind...I don't think I could leave them behind, but I can understand why some families had little choice...

My local animal hospital packed 2 huge Uhaul trucks of donated cat and dog food for all the displaced pets in New Orleans...the poor things.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
baron j Donating Member (434 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-06-05 05:15 AM
Response to Original message
42. We wouldn't have human civilization without our pets and livestock.
Edited on Tue Sep-06-05 05:16 AM by baron j
Scarborough is heartless, and is pandering to his fake "tough guy" audience.

Pets have performed so many useful functions: as pack animals, animals used to pull plows and carts, dogs to assist in the hunt, cats to kill rodents that threaten grain stores and spread pestilence, etc. Also, they comfort a lonely heart. And there have been countless documented cases of pets and animals aiding in the rescue of a human. We owe them much.

Animal rescuers doing what they do doesn't detract from human rescue.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bridget Burke Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-06-05 09:28 AM
Response to Reply #42
51. They'll need plenty of cats to go after the rats....
Edited on Tue Sep-06-05 09:28 AM by Bridget Burke
The animal rescue groups aren't taking resources from the human rescue groups.

The Houston SPCA is taking in animals from the affected area. Some (already homeless) may be adopted. Others will get free room & board until they can be reunited with their owners.

www.spcahouston.org/SPCAHouston/Katrina_News.asp?SnID=229097059

Of course, those are the animals who got out of the area in the first place. (Some early evacuees checked into hotels with their pets; now, as the money runs out, they are going into shelters.)

The NOLA SPCA also evacuated all their charges to Houston before the storm. These were already homeless.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NAO Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-06-05 09:27 AM
Response to Original message
50. My Dogs are Maltese. They are pure white, and known as an aristocratic
breed of dogs.

Do you suppose the Racist Republicans of the Rabid Religious Reich and their Radical Clerics would believe that my white, aristocratic dogs deserve to be rescued, while other dogs, such as mixed breeds or Black Labradors, Chihuahuas (read: Latinos), or especially French Poodles do not deserve to be rescued?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Wabbajack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-06-05 09:36 AM
Response to Original message
52. I don't get the big deal
what's their problem with allowing pets on helos and buses? It's not like they take up a seat.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
queenjane Donating Member (258 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-06-05 09:50 AM
Response to Original message
54. I decided long ago,
in the event I had to make this choice, I would stay with my cats. I'd put my elderly mother in the boat with her meds, and my will and life insurance papers so she could collect later (if necessary), and remain behind with the babies I'd rescued. I would rather be dead than live with the horror of abandoning them to die alone.

If someone thinks I'm crazy, that's their problem.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FreedomAngel82 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-06-05 10:43 PM
Response to Original message
58. Really
I guess he's never owned a dog or cat eh? Or his kids?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
laugle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-07-05 01:28 AM
Response to Original message
65. I'm sooo glad you posted this, just tonight
my husband and I were talking about why don't people realize that pets are part of the family? They are just as loved as a humans except in a different way.

Did you see that poor elderly woman who would not evacuate, because she couldn't leave her dog? I heard today they finally let someone take their dog. I was hoping it was her.

Seeing all those dogs tonight running through that polluted water made me sick!

We need foster homes for pets!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kenroy Donating Member (768 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-07-05 01:59 AM
Response to Original message
66. This is not just about saving animals for the sake
of saving animals.

It's the greatest thing we can do for their owners. I know if I were forced (and I would have to be forced at gunpoint) to leave my pets, I would heartsick and forlorn until I knew what became of them. If an organization were able to rescue them and reunite me with them, it would literally keep me alive.

Some people just love pets and some people don't. But those of us who do understand how important it is to try to save them. They are innocents who rely on us, and it's an obligation we take on when we bring them home. Most of us take that obligation seriously.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 02nd 2024, 10:41 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC