Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Is it my imagination, or are the areas of NO that are flooded all poor?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
renie408 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-10-05 12:02 AM
Original message
Is it my imagination, or are the areas of NO that are flooded all poor?
Ok, it is pretty late where I am and WAY past my bedtime, so maybe my thought processes are getting funky...but am I completely being crazy that I am starting to think that it is some kind of bizarre conspiracy that the nicer parts of NO are dry and just the poor parts got flooded? And that it seems like a little bit too much of a coincidence to me that the rich white assholes want to rebuild NO without the poor people?

Tell me this is just a coincidence. Tell me I am going to wake up tomorrow after getting a good night's sleep and think this idea I am having now is silly.

Right?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Kagemusha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-10-05 12:04 AM
Response to Original message
1. When the city expanded into the flood-prone swampland
the poor settled there because natuarlly, land is cheaper on land where flooding is more likely. That is, well, how it is.

It's not conspiracy. It's the economics of land values.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
xray s Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-10-05 12:06 AM
Response to Original message
2. Not quite
But there is no doubt the richer, dryer areas are on higher ground, for obvious reasons. But there are some poorer areas of the garden district that are dry, and areas of the business district are in flood water.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RosaP Donating Member (14 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-10-05 12:08 AM
Response to Original message
3. Indirectly
The higher-priced real estate in N.O. tends to be higher above sea level. The entire city was exposed to the same deluge, lower areas got deeper water. I heard that a city outside N.O. that was a retreat for the better off was completely wiped off the map.

The poor tended to get the lower, more shoddily-built homes and were less likely to have gotten out of the city.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NoSheep Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-10-05 12:11 AM
Response to Reply #3
6. Right on RosaP and welcome to DU!
:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RosaP Donating Member (14 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-10-05 12:10 AM
Response to Original message
4. Conspiracy...
...three nearly identical responses entered at the same time!

Are the illuminati afoot?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PuraVidaDreamin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-10-05 12:18 AM
Response to Reply #4
7. we should ask Capt May
google him
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bluerthanblue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-10-05 12:11 AM
Response to Original message
5. most of the lowest lying communities
in NOLA are/were neighborhoods made up of people with the least wealth.
If the homes of the less privileged neighborhoods aren't rebuilt, NOLA won't be anywhere near the city it was.
And if building on 'hazardous areas' is so foolish, why should anyone build any more skyscrapers in NYC, or on any of the many 'fault lines' in Ca. or the forest fire prone areas of the west, or mudslide areas, or much of Fla, and the Carolinas.

I don't think you are silly- I think you see the truth.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CottonBear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-10-05 12:26 AM
Response to Original message
8. You must not live in the South. Poor minorities live down by the river
Edited on Sat Sep-10-05 12:29 AM by CottonBear
or the levee or on the other side of the tracks or on the "other side of town."
It is the historical pattern of city/community development..

I'm a southerner. That's just the way it is but not the way it has to be.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
renie408 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-10-05 12:35 AM
Response to Reply #8
9. I thought only motivational speakers lived in vans down by the river
And I live in SC. I was born in Charleston. My entire family since before the flood were born in Charleston. I have a hybrid camellia named after me. My mother is a member of the DAR, the United Daughters of the Confederacy AND the Junior League. Really. You don't get any more southern than I am. I even tell myself that the War of Northern Aggression was about state's rights, not slavery (not really, that part was a joke, so back off all you abolitionists). I grew up hearing my parents call people 'carpet baggers' and 'mill workers' like it was a bad thing. I am an outcast in my family because I am *gasp* a Democrat and I married a Yankee (his mother is from Ohio) and I wouldn't attend debutante balls like my sisters did. I have a crazy Aunt Kitty.

Trust me. I get the South.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Stinky The Clown Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-10-05 12:53 AM
Response to Reply #9
10. Your home city, Charleston, is the most beautiful in the US
I lived there in the 60s ... back when L. Mendell Rivers was king down there.

There was a saying back then (maybe still):

"Dogs and Sailors keep off the grass."

I was one of those two.

And we were lower than paper mill workers.

But still, I loved your city.

Still do.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
renie408 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-10-05 01:07 AM
Response to Reply #10
13. I love Charleston
I even love the smell of low tide. It is hard now that I have developed a different political and philisopical sensibility sometimes because so much of the history of that city is so ugly. When I was little, I would love to go to the slave market to go shopping. Now it is kind of creepy. When I was younger, I was so proud that my family had owned a real plantation before THE war (and seriously, if any of the older people in my family say anything about THE war, you know which one they are talking about and it isn't WWII). Now I never tell anybody that. It is hard to really deep down be proud to be a Southerner when at the same time, you are ashamed to be a Southerner. When I think of Southern pride and history, I think of graciousness, manners, hospitality, generosity and a sort of steel magnolia strength. But the reality is that so much of Southern history really is about slavery and oppression. I didn't figure any of that out until I hit my mid-teens. I always saw my parents being friendly towards 'blacks'. I didn't realize until I was about 13-14 that it was a patronizing kind of friendliness.

I can tell you right now my 74 year old mother would have a stroke if she knew my son's girlfriend was afro-american. And I feel like I am as bad as she is because I have found ways to avoid her finding out.

Sorry for the rambling, it is really late here and I think I am starting to wander.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CottonBear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-10-05 09:21 AM
Response to Reply #13
18. I too love Charleston and I come from an old Southern family (NC).
Charleston is beautiful. Ones of the great Southern cities.

My family are all republicans except for my apolitical sister. They are racist (although some say they're not but they really are.) My mom didn't want my black boyfriend to come to Thanksgiving dinner and uninvited him (after she'd invited him) because "what would the neighbors think?" My husbands family in St. Tammany Parish, LA are very racist (as in "we'd vote for David Duke if he ran again.")
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
undergroundpanther Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-10-05 01:42 AM
Response to Reply #9
16. My grandma
and my folks are sothern too

And some are stupid rethugs but my grandma was a die hard DEM..
There's a road in Galax named after her/my family. Some of my souther family is DEM..And they hate carpetbaggers too and there are"confederate heros in outr family and indians we are melungeons.The freaky side of the south...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
renie408 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-10-05 01:51 AM
Response to Reply #16
17. All my people are smug Repukes
It makes family gatherings tough. My mother has actually come around a bit. She finds Bush un-Presidential. But honestly, I think it has less to do with his policies and more to do with the fact that she thinks he is casual. For awhile there when she started to talk about how much she was starting to dislike him, I got excited. But then I figured out it was more of a superficial objection. I will say this for her, she doesn't like him throwing his religion around. Oddly enough for diehard Southerners, both my parents are/were atheists.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
begin_within Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-10-05 01:03 AM
Response to Original message
11. Whenever fires rage through California, the rich folks' areas burn.
Because the houses built next to canyons and in forests are much more expensive than plain tract houses in city grids... these high-priced houses are the ones that are most vulnerable to wildfires.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
petronius Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-10-05 01:25 AM
Response to Reply #11
15. I was thinking about that the other day
not just fires, but landslides as well - our pattern of vulnerability is just the opposite of Louisiana.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
craigolemiss Donating Member (223 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-10-05 01:05 AM
Response to Original message
12. not really--both rich and poor got hit
I saw one report that showed some poor areas that had no damage at all, one guy said not even a window broken, and he didnt want to leave.

He said he had 4 more weeks of food and water and wasn't leaving---

there were also some VERY expensive houses that are still under 15 feet of water--
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
renie408 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-10-05 01:12 AM
Response to Reply #12
14. I saw that!
He was pretty adament about staying with his house.

It just seemed to me that a disproportionate number of lower income housing seemed to be effected. But the lower ground land being less expensive makes sense; I just wasn't thinking. I also just finished reading that article about the creepy old money NO'ers who didn't want the poor to be included in the rebuilding. I was having visions of conspiracies dancing in my head.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 02nd 2024, 09:39 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC