|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
Rose Siding (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Oct-02-05 07:54 PM Original message |
Isikoff: Fitz planned on impaneling new GJ if Miller wouldn't talk |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Humor_In_Cuneiform (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Oct-02-05 07:59 PM Response to Original message |
1. So that's what got them moving |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
janx (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Oct-02-05 07:59 PM Response to Original message |
2. Day-um! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
oldtime dfl_er (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Oct-02-05 08:00 PM Response to Original message |
3. Every time I read something like this I have new hope |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
despairing optimist (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Oct-02-05 08:06 PM Response to Original message |
4. It's a prosecutor's choice, to keep empaneling new grand juries |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
KoKo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Oct-02-05 08:11 PM Response to Original message |
5. Isikoff reveals that Libby did not talk to Novak ....so |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
janx (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Oct-02-05 08:14 PM Response to Reply #5 |
6. I've been wondering if this case involves not just the outing |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
hang a left (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Oct-02-05 08:36 PM Response to Original message |
7. It would seem that PF had Miller over a barrel.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
janx (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Oct-02-05 08:43 PM Response to Reply #7 |
9. He may know more--through other sources/venues--than we |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Rose Siding (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Oct-02-05 08:49 PM Response to Reply #7 |
10. One theory is that he only needed to know one thing from her- |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sendero (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Oct-02-05 08:39 PM Response to Original message |
8. As usual.. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dicknbush (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Oct-02-05 08:54 PM Response to Original message |
11. I.m thinking we might see un-indicted co-conspirators for Bush and Cheney? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
gratuitous (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Oct-02-05 08:57 PM Response to Original message |
12. And after her employer editorialized that she'd never talk |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
emulatorloo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Oct-02-05 09:40 PM Response to Original message |
13. "Fitzgerald, who is expected to wrap up his probe soon, had no comment." |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Wed May 01st 2024, 01:01 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC