Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

John Fund: The GOP Could Lose in '06

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
RamboLiberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-03-05 12:28 AM
Original message
John Fund: The GOP Could Lose in '06
http://www.opinionjournal.com/diary/?id=110007351

<snip>

The loudest warning was sounded in November, 2003. At the behest of the White House, Mr. Hastert and then-Majority Leader DeLay held a floor vote open for three hours early one morning while they browbeat GOP members to pass a prescription drug benefit that was the largest expansion of an entitlement program since LBJ's Great Society. "It was a watershed event, the moment when Republicans who stood for limited government realized they were the enemy of their own leadership," Sen. Tom Coburn of Oklahoma told me.
Since then the GOP's love affair with big government has intensified. This summer Congress passed a $286 billion highway bill stuffed with 6,373 pork-barrel projects inserted by individual members, many so marginal they have drawn national ridicule. All this was abetted or even led by a Bush White House that has yet to veto a single bill and whose officials have apparently adapted the old New Deal slogan "tax and tax, and spend and spend, and elect and elect" into merely "spend and spend."

The ouster of Tom DeLay last week came over a dubious Texas indictment on campaign finance violations. But he was in hot water with the conservative base before that for a series of bizarre statements opposing budget cuts to pay for the costs of Hurricane Katrina relief.

He first claimed with a straight face that the GOP Congress had "pared down pretty good; I am ready to declare ongoing victory." He then dismissed calls for delaying the start of the prescription drug benefit for a year by claiming it was designed to save money in the long run. "Postponing a reform that is going to implement fiscal restraint doesn't make a whole lot of sense," he lectured fellow members. Finally, he reacted to news that Democratic House leader Nancy Pelosi would give up some specific transportation projects in her San Francisco district to help pay for Katrina by defending the projects in his own district. "The highway bill is an important part of building our economy," he told reporters. Mr. DeLay seemed to be channeling Richard Nixon, another big spender, who once foolishly claimed, "We are all Keynesians now."

Talk like that has demoralized much of the Republican base. With nearly all Democrats and two-thirds of independents reacting negatively to the Bush presidency, Republicans need to keep GOP voters in the fold. But only 78% of Republicans express approval of Mr. Bush, down from well over 90% at the time of his re-election. With only 32% of Americans believing that the country is headed in the right direction and only 33% approving of the job Congress is doing, the GOP has reason to worry. "By an eight-point margin, voters are now more likely to call themselves Democrats than Republicans; there was no gap in self-identification a year ago," notes political handicapper Charlie Cook.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Chevy Donating Member (195 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-03-05 12:34 AM
Response to Original message
1. And Diabold.
Will be laughing with the Repugs when they keep the house and senate in 06.:hide:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Melodybe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-03-05 12:35 AM
Response to Original message
2. Whatever the GOP is losing now and is going down hard in '06
End of story.

Diebold needs for elections to be close, popular opinion still means something after all.

The are loosing in 06, nothing I've thought or read has suggested otherwise.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Straight Shooter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-03-05 12:35 AM
Response to Original message
3. Just had to insert that little slam in there, didn't they?
"Dubious" Texas indictment. Nothing dubious about it, WSJ. Get a clue.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Chevy Donating Member (195 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-03-05 12:42 AM
Response to Reply #3
4. Common sense.
Edited on Mon Oct-03-05 12:42 AM by Chevy
Says your right. But after the 04 debacle I will never underestimate to what lengths the media will go to silence the facts.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gumby Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-03-05 12:47 AM
Response to Original message
5. John Fund is a woman beating, know-nothing creep.
Only in neo-con 'Murika could this jerk even have a job, much less pontificate about 'politics' on OUR airwaves and prattle on in a predominate U.S. newspaper.

Phooie on the U.S. media. :puke:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
murielm99 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-03-05 01:44 AM
Response to Reply #5
7. He beats women? Huh? nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gumby Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-03-05 02:49 AM
Response to Reply #7
9. He said/she said
However, there is no doubt that he boinked the mother, and then he boinked the daughter, and then the daughter brought charges.
http://www.google.com/search?sourceid=navclient&ie=UTF-8&rls=RNWE,RNWE:2004-10,RNWE:en&q=john+fund%2C+woman+beating

Then he told the daughter to get an abortion because of his boinking. Then (allegedly) he smacked around the daughter he boinked of the mother he boinked.

Seems the boinking is not in question. One might question the "smacking" because it never went to court, however, the abortion demand is on tape and on the Internets.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
opihimoimoi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-03-05 01:02 AM
Response to Original message
6. The Nation will SHIFT LEFT thanks to the All IN BET by the GOPle
which turned out to be a BLUFF. Bush has done it for Common Sense and Reality....He has shown he is out of touch and is lacking in the Common Sense equation....

For Gods Sake, the man canardly ride a bike or tell a joke...much less pick an able staff.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RUMMYisFROSTED Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-03-05 02:14 AM
Response to Original message
8. "dubious?"
:puffpiece:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ladylibertee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-03-05 02:54 AM
Response to Original message
10. I agree.I have been paying very close attention to what the
Edited on Mon Oct-03-05 03:09 AM by ladylibertee
republican strategist are saying on their "panels".CNN, MSNBC,CSPAN and low and behold FOX .They are EXTREMLY worried about losing 2006.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lexingtonian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-03-05 03:56 AM
Response to Original message
11. Charlie Cook

was saying in his GovExec columns in June that Republicans had nothing to worry about in next year's elections. I was pretty sure then that he was totally wrong and wondered a good bit about where he'd gotten that idea- the Republican polling started going soft with the Schiavo blowup, even a rank amateur like myself could see there was only decline or stalemate at best in the numbers. Decline being the much safer bet, given that bunch's track record of blowing support and pigheaded failure.

It's nice to see that Cook opinion was basically just Beltway groupthink. But I'd thought Charlie was smarter than going with the groupthink and his Republican consultant buddies' opinions when the numbers and trend in the numbers were darn clear.

I don't read his GovExec column anymore.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 01st 2024, 01:19 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC