Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Meirs tied to Bush' National Guard Scandal

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
WestHoustonDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-03-05 10:08 AM
Original message
Meirs tied to Bush' National Guard Scandal
http://www.pnionline.com/dnblog/attytood/archives/002383.html

Breaking News: President Bush on Monday nominated White House counsel Harriet Miers to replace retiring Justice Sandra Day O'Connor on the Supreme Court, reaching into his loyal inner circle for a pick that could reshape the nation's judiciary for years to come.

Last week, we looked at a troubling episode in Miers' past -- we're reposting for anyone who missed it:

White House counsel Harriet Miers has never served as a judge before, and while this career "hard-nosed lawyer" (as she is invariably described) from Texas certainly deserves some kudos for a trailblazing career as a female lawyer, she's not a legal scholar, either.

But she does know better than just about anyone else where the bodies are buried (relax, it's a just a metaphor...we hope) in President Bush's National Guard scandal. In fact, Bush's Texas gubenatorial campaign in 1998 (when he was starting to eye the White House) actually paid Miers $19,000 to run an internal pre-emptive probe of the potential scandal. Not long after, a since-settled lawsuit alleged that the Texas Lottery Commission -- while chaired by Bush appointee Miers -- played a role in a multi-million dollar cover-up of the scandal.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
fooj Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-03-05 10:10 AM
Response to Original message
1. She's also connected to Gonzales. Ugh.
Peace.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Avalux Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-03-05 10:11 AM
Response to Original message
2. She's an insider. She knows the underhandedness carried on by the WH
That alone makes me shudder; how can this woman be ethical?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheFarseer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-03-05 10:13 AM
Response to Original message
3. This is the angle we need to play
Especially any improper use of lotto funds. We don't want to turn this into Roe v Wade II. We all know where that gets us. I want to pound them into dust on corruption.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
speedoo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-03-05 10:19 AM
Response to Original message
4. Dem senators need to pound away on this,
She has no judicial record, therfefore everything else becomes mmore important. This woman must not be nominated.

Need to get moderate Repub senators to vote no.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheFarseer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-03-05 10:30 AM
Response to Reply #4
5. If we can link her to corruption
then we might shame some repubs into voting 'no' *Some* of them are sick of this crap too or at least embarrassed by it. We will never get any repubs on board by talking about "rights" They are so warped, most of them think rights is a synonym for abortion.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 01st 2024, 11:58 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC