keopeli
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Oct-09-05 06:19 PM
Original message |
That's conspiracy, treason, and murder. |
|
Much of what we are learning now has been known for quite some time. It is reasonable to suspect that we are being fed each of these public releases of information in a manner dictated by those in power. Lest we forget, Fitzgerald is a Republican.
July 03 will become a notable month in world history.
It is when David Kelly, a British Intelligence Offical who had noted that the rationale for the Iraq War had been "sexed up", was found dead from mysterious circumstances.
At the same time, US officals, including Rove, Rice, Libby, and many more, devised a plan to put the kibosh on the CIA via illegal means: revealing classified information damaging the US during a time of war.
The fact that these events occurred at almost the same time is indicative of a much larger effort to supress the Intelligence Community in the US and UK. That's conspiracy, treason, and murder.
It's absolutely moronic to think we are falling for the "I just found a notebook with a relevant page" and "I missed an email because I wasn't using the right search word" excuses.
We are being spoon fed treasonous revelations. We should assume that every possible measure is being taken to protect Bush the Lesser.
|
DoYouEverWonder
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Oct-09-05 06:47 PM
Response to Original message |
1. I think David Kelly is the main reason Miller |
|
agreed to talk only after Fitzgerald agreed to limit the scope of his questioning.
I do believe that the outing of Plame and Brewster Jennings and the murder of David Kelly are two closely related events, with Ms Judy sitting in the middle of both of them.
|
keopeli
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Oct-09-05 06:52 PM
Response to Reply #1 |
3. And she should have plead the 5th Amendment, not the 1st. eom |
texpatriot2004
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Oct-09-05 11:39 PM
Response to Reply #1 |
9. Was Kelly suicided? Also, it looks like Miller committed perjury |
|
and the limiting questions thing is now off the table eh.
|
truthisfreedom
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Oct-10-05 06:32 AM
Response to Reply #9 |
11. if that's true, perhaps the reason Fitzgerald agreed to limiting questions |
|
because he knew about the other notebook and knew he could pin the perjury charge on her, breaking the agreement and forcing her to talk to the grand jury.
|
texpatriot2004
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Oct-10-05 11:38 AM
Response to Reply #11 |
Mr Rabble
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Oct-09-05 06:51 PM
Response to Original message |
2. I totally agree with this premise. |
|
All of these events are connected. The enormous scope of this scandal makes me wonder if it will ever see the light of day.
|
keopeli
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Oct-09-05 06:57 PM
Response to Reply #2 |
4. The larger the scope, the better |
|
Where in the world would you find a more oppressive government (among democries) than the US? The press is muzzled. Her citizens are jailed indefinitely without cause. Torture is an accepted policy, as is pre-emptive war.
If these revelations expose foreigners whose governments are not US friendly (of which there are, unfortunately, way too many), then the real truth will be exposed.
And even allies like Britain don't contain their press the way the US does. Real investigative journalism is scant to absent in the US.
|
cassiepriam
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Oct-09-05 07:07 PM
Response to Original message |
5. All in a day's work for a repug, They will become icons. |
|
Edited on Sun Oct-09-05 07:07 PM by cassiepriam
Hope I am wrong.
|
hang a left
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Oct-09-05 07:16 PM
Response to Original message |
6. I was wondering today if some of the leaks aren't to give |
|
heads up to other witnesses, subjects, and targets a heads up as to what is going on.
|
Stinky The Clown
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Oct-09-05 07:31 PM
Response to Original message |
7. For the brazillianth time ..... Fitzgerald is not a Republican |
murielm99
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Oct-10-05 06:27 AM
Response to Reply #7 |
10. Thank you. I did think he was a Republican. |
|
I may have assumed it, because Senator Fitzgerald recommended him.
|
unlawflcombatnt
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Oct-10-05 11:54 AM
Response to Reply #7 |
13. Thanks for the Fitzgerald article link |
|
I had thought he was a Republican myself. According to that article he's an Independent. And he's an excellent person to be investigating this case.
|
Stinky The Clown
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Oct-10-05 03:24 PM
Response to Reply #13 |
14. There was an earlier article about him that was far better |
|
I wanted to find an earlier article that stated far clearer his political background. I couln't find it.
The long and short of it is he has never registered with a party except once. In NY (I believe it was) he once registered as an 'Independent'. It turns out that, in NY (if that's where this was, and I thing it is), 'Independent' is a party, not a condition. He promptly unregistered and has never reregistered anywhere.
I'd guess his party, if it matches his work ethic, is the "Agressively Just" party.
|
texpatriot2004
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Oct-09-05 11:37 PM
Response to Original message |
8. BINGO! "We are being spoon fed treasonous revelations." nm |
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Wed May 08th 2024, 04:11 AM
Response to Original message |