Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Libby Did Not Tell Grand Jury (or FBI ) About Key Conversation w/ Miller

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
npincus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-11-05 07:17 PM
Original message
Libby Did Not Tell Grand Jury (or FBI ) About Key Conversation w/ Miller
http://nationaljournal.com/about/njweekly/stories/2005/1011nj1.htm

It sure looks like Scooter is going DOWNNNNNNNN. I'm not sure about Rove, but one can only REALLY hope. This news broke today, in the National Journal:

In two appearances before the federal grand jury investigating the leak of a covert CIA operative's name, Lewis (Scooter) Libby, the chief of staff to Vice President Cheney, did not disclose a crucial conversation that he had with New York Times reporter Judith Miller in June 2003 about the operative, Valerie Plame, according to sources with firsthand knowledge of his sworn testimony.

<snip>

Libby also did not disclose the June 23 conversation when he was twice interviewed by FBI agents working on the Plame leak investigation, the sources said.

Special prosecutor Patrick Fitzgerald apparently learned about the June 23 conversation for the first time just days ago, after attorneys for Miller and The New York Times informed prosecutors that Miller had discovered a set of notes on the conversation.


<snip>

Meanwhile, in recent days Fitzgerald has also expressed significant interest in whether Libby may have sought to discourage Miller-either directly or indirectly through her attorney-from testifying before the grand jury, or cooperating in other ways with the criminal probe, according to attorneys familiar with Miller's discussions with prosecutors.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-11-05 07:19 PM
Response to Original message
1. Do you think it's considered a lie if a fact wasn't disclosed?
Would that fall under perjury? I soooooo hope!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ret5hd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-11-05 07:23 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. Were there any other contacts of this nature that you haven't...
told us about?

NO.

Yeah, that's perjury.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
longship Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-11-05 07:24 PM
Response to Original message
3. I wonder which motel these conversations occured in.
Edited on Tue Oct-11-05 07:25 PM by longship
:evilgrin:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri May 03rd 2024, 03:08 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC