i am more than willing to have anyone challenge the integrity of these polls ... i have no idea how they were taken and i have no idea whether they reflect the position of the Iraqi people ...
the greater point, though, is that we must respect the fundamental argument that if the Iraqi people want us out, we have to leave ... toward that end, Democrats should call for a national referendum of the Iraqi people on this issue ... the vote should be held ASAP !!
i greatly appreciate your integrity and your honest assessment of the situation ... i can't thank you enough for conveying these ideas and this polling information to General Clark ... how can America claim it is pushing democracy and then not allow the Iraqi people to choose their own destiny ???
and as long as i'm on a "we have no right to be there" roll, consider this ... i would argue that bush is in violation of the authorization he was given by Congress in the IWR ... neither of the two conditions stipulated in the authorization remains - one can no longer make a credible argument (if one ever could have) that Iraq poses a continuing threat to the national security of the US ... in fact, bush no longer cites that as an objective for continued US occupation ... the primary argument has morphed into building stability and democracy ... that is not a stated objective in the IWR ... and second, Iraq is in compliance with all UN resolutions ... Iraq never had any WMD and they certainly don't have any now ...
so bush in now in clear violation of the IWR by continuing to "use the Armed Forces of the United States as he determines to be necessary and appropriate" ...
SEC. 3. AUTHORIZATION FOR USE OF UNITED STATES ARMED FORCES.
(a) AUTHORIZATION. The President is authorized to use the Armed Forces of the United States as he determines to be necessary and appropriate in order to
(1) defend the national security of the United States against the continuing threat posed by Iraq; and
(2) enforce all relevant United Nations Security Council Resolutions regarding Iraq.