Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

PROOF: Yes, conservatism is a mental disorder

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
JJackFlash Donating Member (541 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-06-05 07:55 PM
Original message
PROOF: Yes, conservatism is a mental disorder
"... conservatism can be explained psychologically as a set of neuroses rooted in "fear and aggression, dogmatism and the intolerance of ambiguity" that leads them to "arrive at premature conclusions, and to impose simplistic cliches and stereotypes".

They suggest that Hitler, Mussolini, Ronald Reagan and the right wing talk show host, Rush Limbaugh all suffer from the same affliction. George Bush appears to be a textbook case as indicated by his need for moral certainty and dislike of nuance."

http://www.wam.umd.edu/~hannahk/conservatism.html

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
rocktivity Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-06-05 07:58 PM
Response to Original message
1. Lucky for them that they're not big on science.
:evilgrin:
rocknation
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bigbrother05 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-06-05 07:58 PM
Response to Original message
2. I think they're lonely.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JJackFlash Donating Member (541 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-06-05 08:04 PM
Response to Original message
3. sick bastards
“We consider evidence for and against the hypotheses that political conservatism is significantly associated with
(1) mental rigidity and closed-mindedness, including (a) increased dogmatism and intolerance of ambiguity, (b) decreased cognitive complexity, (c) decreased openness to experience, (d) uncertainty avoidance, (e) personal needs for order and structure, and (f) need for cognitive closure;
(2) lowered self-esteem;
(3) fear, anger, and aggression;
(4) pessimism, disgust, and contempt;
(5) loss prevention;
(6) fear of death;
(7) threat arising from social and economic deprivation; and
(8) threat to the stability of the social system.
We have argued that these motives are in fact related to one another psychologically, and our motivated social–cognitive perspective helps to integrate them. We now offer an integrative, meta-analytic review of research on epistemic, existential, and ideological bases of conservatism” (352).

Psychological needs of conservatives (368) : As evident in Republican ideology
“Resistance to change” : reactionary conservatism
“Endorsement of inequality” : discrimination against minorities, justification of poverty, etc.
“Dogmatism, intolerance of ambiguity” : close-mindedness, “moral clarity”
“Uncertainty avoidance” : simplistic “black and white” perception, hostility to the arts
“Need for order, structure, closure” : anti-union, loathing of antisocial hippies
“Self-esteem” : less stable in conservatives
“Loss prevention” : death anxiety, “chickenhawk” syndrome
“Terror management” : hysterical anti-communism, The War on “Terrorism”
“Rationalization of self-interest” : “Greed is good,” Trickle-Down economic theory
“Group-based dominance” : Jim Crow segregation, country club plutocrats
“System justification” : low-status conservatives such as the working class

In summary, “Our review of the evidence indicates that there is consistent and relatively strong support for the general hypothesis that a specific set of social–cognitive motives are significantly related to political conservatism. Almost all of our specific hypotheses were corroborated … by reviewing the results from many different studies aggregated across various behavioral domains and contexts, we found that a moderate to strong relationship does exist between an interrelated set of epistemic, existential, and ideological motives and the expression of political conservatism” (366).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
smirkymonkey Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-06-05 08:35 PM
Response to Original message
4. Kick
:kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JJackFlash Donating Member (541 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-06-05 08:41 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. "kick" meaning what?
still kinda new at this
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
smirkymonkey Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-06-05 08:48 PM
Response to Reply #5
7. Just kicking the post up so that it gets more attention, I was too
lazy to comment myself, but interested in hearing other people's comments.

It's a way to revive a post that you find interesting, but isn't getting too much attention because of the speed at which certain forums move.

Welcome to DU JJackFlash! :hi:

and this is a "kick" smilie:

:kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JJackFlash Donating Member (541 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-06-05 08:51 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. wasn't recommended for Greatest Page
so how did you kick?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
smirkymonkey Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-06-05 08:57 PM
Response to Reply #8
11. A kick just increases the post count .
You actually have to click on recommend to recommend it - which I will now do.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sendero Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-06-05 08:51 PM
Response to Reply #5
9. Every time..
.... a reply is added to a thread, it gets "kicked" to the top of the listing of threads in the forum main page.

Some boards call it a "bump" :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Gman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-06-05 08:41 PM
Response to Original message
6. Not really proof
but the illness is defined.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JJackFlash Donating Member (541 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-06-05 08:52 PM
Response to Reply #6
10. They carried out a thorough, peer-reviewed scientific study
and came to firm conclusions.
Seems like proof to me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ismnotwasm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-06-05 09:03 PM
Response to Original message
12. I also think
If someone did a study they would solid correlation between chronic, intractable criminal antisocial thought patterns and conservatives thought patterns.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
drduffy Donating Member (739 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-06-05 10:56 PM
Response to Original message
13. common knowledge in my profession...
clin psych for a while now. Conservativism is not common in this profession .... but there is always the possibility of the development of a paranoid personality disorder qua religious extremist such as is seen in Dobson. Piece of shit that he is and black mark on psychology.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
atommom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-07-05 09:39 AM
Response to Original message
14. I've read several articles on this subject. One particularly
interesting one concerned dreaming. Apparently progressives enjoy their dreams far more than conservatives do. Conservatives tend to have dreams about losing control that are frightening to them, while progressives tend to "go with the flow" of their dreams. Will see if I can find the abstract...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat May 04th 2024, 09:29 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC