Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Has there been any debunking of that hit-piece book on "Liberal Hypocrisy"

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Rosco T. Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-07-05 05:04 AM
Original message
Has there been any debunking of that hit-piece book on "Liberal Hypocrisy"
it's being spread faster than warm runny shite and if there is any ammo to fire back, it would be nice to have..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Realityhack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-07-05 06:18 AM
Response to Original message
1. Sorry never heard of it.
If there are particular arguments you might post the generals. The chances of me reading something like that just to argue against it are less than zero.

BTW. Hypocracy is easy to find (both real and immagined) on both sides of the isle. IMO you may have a tough time because the reality is very complex... and you are not likely to be debating with people who understand complexity.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
abluelady Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-07-05 07:48 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. I Bet to Differ With You
I think you may find lies on both sides of the aisle, but it seems to me the hypocricy is owned by the other side.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HeeBGBz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-07-05 08:21 AM
Response to Reply #1
4. The one that says Michael Moore owns stock in Halliburton
After saying he doesn't own any stock at all.

I'm needing to battle this on another board, as well.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dime.end Donating Member (33 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-07-05 07:52 AM
Response to Original message
3. I didn't read it either. but here is part of a review...
But there is a rational explanation for the apparent hypocrisy of Al Franken. In order to understand it, you have to listen to Al Franken’s “nuanced” explanation of the difference between “unfair mean” and “fair mean” jokes. Here’s an example of a “fair mean” joke made by Franken himself:


“I just don’t like homosexuals. If you ask me, they’re all homosexuals in the Pudding. Hey, I was glad when that Pudding homosexual got killed in Philadelphia.”

For those who don’t get this “fair mean” joke, Franken is attacking Harvard’s Hasty Pudding Club, which is a humorous dramatic society – one that never invited Franken to join while he was at Harvard. So, naturally, when you are snubbed by an organization, it is “fair” to rejoice when one of its members is murdered. This is especially true if the person murdered is gay and the person snubbed is liberal.


It would be nice to get this "de-SwiftBoated" as soon as possible

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nuxvomica Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-07-05 09:49 AM
Response to Original message
5. There's some good debunking at this blog:
http://sbrady2.blogspot.com/

The November 5, 2005, entry debunks the Michael Moore Halliburton stock ownership issue and contains a link to a debunking of the Franken Hasty Pudding comments.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dime.end Donating Member (33 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-07-05 04:06 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. thanks for the link
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nederland Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-07-05 04:19 PM
Response to Reply #5
7. Not sure how good a debunking this is
Rich people shift their asserts into corporations for tax reasons all the time. To argue that it isn't "Michael Moore" that owns the stock, it's his "corporation" that owns the stock, is a rather weak argument. He is the sole owner of the coroporation and controls all of its assets. If it isn't his stock, whose is it?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Luminous Animal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-07-05 08:08 PM
Response to Reply #7
9. It is a tax exempt charitable foundation (n/t)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nederland Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-08-05 11:40 AM
Response to Reply #9
10. No it's not
Edited on Tue Nov-08-05 11:40 AM by Nederland
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Luminous Animal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-08-05 06:48 PM
Response to Reply #10
11. Don't let the title of the form confuse you.
If you look at the pdf of the form you will notice under item H Type of organization, the box checked states, "Section 501 (c) 3 exempt private foundation. As per Form 990 PF instructions:
TextCheck the box for “Section 501(c)(3)
exempt private foundation” if the foundation has a ruling or determination letter from the IRS in effect that recognizes its exemption from Federal income tax as an organization described in section 501(c)(3) or if the organization’s exemption application is pending with the IRS.


Link to Instructions for form 990-PF
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
erpowers Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-07-05 07:50 PM
Response to Original message
8. Maybe Here's One
I am not a scholar, but I think there is a good way to debunk this Micheal Moore stuff. I contend so what is good enough. Micheal Moore has come out against the practices of certain corporations and come out against certain corporations getting no bid contracts. Moore has never to my knowledge come out against people owning stock in these companies. Therefore, I contend Moore owning stock in companies, whether it is Moore himself or his company, is not hypocritical. In addition, if Republicans want to say that Moore is hypocritical then they have to say that Lou Dobbs is hypocritical. Lou Dobbs wrote a book in which he bashed corporations like Wal-Mart for moving their jobs oversees. However, Dobbs continued to encourage his followers to buy stock in these same companies. Dobbs had no problem telling people to buy stock in companies that he had just bashed in his book. I believe Dobbs has stock in some of these same companies also.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat May 04th 2024, 10:19 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC