Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Shouldn't it be an ethics violation to author a resolution -and vote no.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
European Socialist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-19-05 08:24 PM
Original message
Shouldn't it be an ethics violation to author a resolution -and vote no.
House reps. get paid big money and it is like an act of vandalism to waste their time on a political ploy. I know the Pukes have done similar things like the flag burning amendment-but at least they voted yes on what they proposed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
bemildred Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-19-05 08:25 PM
Response to Original message
1. "House ethics" is an oxymoron. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
electron_blue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-19-05 08:27 PM
Response to Original message
2. I haven't been able to read much news in the last 2 days - who are you
referring to?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
European Socialist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-19-05 08:35 PM
Response to Reply #2
8. House Rep. Duncan Hunter sponsored a resolution to leave Iraq ...
immediately even though he voted no on it. (apparently he wanted to embarrass dems who would vote for it and endanger troops)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
electron_blue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-19-05 08:49 PM
Response to Reply #8
9. Oh, okay. Thanks!
Yeah, he's an idiot. At least leaving Iraq is now the cat out of the bag, instead of inside.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hello_Kitty Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-19-05 08:27 PM
Response to Original message
3. It's certainly a misuse of their time and OUR tax dollars
How many possibly important matters (y'know like maybe ACTUALLY working on a withdrawal plan as Murtha is trying to do) were delayed to conduct this ridiculous political charade?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Skink Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-19-05 08:30 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. Note to Dems waste as much of the illegal occupation that's left.
Talking about getting out of Iraq is not a waste of time however.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Humor_In_Cuneiform Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-19-05 08:29 PM
Response to Original message
4. Add in substituting the resolution even you don't support for the
original resolution and trying to make it seem like it was a vote on the original is the height of a lack of ethics.

Nothing new there, though.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ray of light Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-19-05 08:53 PM
Response to Reply #4
10. they did that too! did you HEAR them in the middle of it?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Humor_In_Cuneiform Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-19-05 10:32 PM
Response to Reply #10
12. I heard Hastert say it was open to debate which resolution they were
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pretzel4gore Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-19-05 08:31 PM
Response to Original message
6. and it was done to MISLEAD and CONFUSE the American people!
that's what is so amazing....the blatant contempt shown for the people, so normal it isn't even commented on!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NanceGreggs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-19-05 08:32 PM
Response to Original message
7. Republican ETHICS!
:rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl:

Thanks, guys, I needed a good LAUGH!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
European Socialist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-19-05 08:55 PM
Response to Original message
11. Now that I think about it -they did the same on re-instating the draft.
It was to embarrass Rangel of NY.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 02nd 2024, 03:30 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC