Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

WITHOUT googling tell me what you think of this Presidential candidate.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
nickshepDEM Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-27-05 11:43 PM
Original message
WITHOUT googling tell me what you think of this Presidential candidate.
Edited on Sun Nov-27-05 11:58 PM by nickshepDEM
I filled in names and states so that his identity is not revealed. Just tell me what you think.

******* was first elected Governor of ***** in 1988, defeating ***** in the primary, and defeating ***** in the general election. He was re-elected governor in 1992 with the highest percentage of the vote in a statewide election in modern ******* history. His administration was considered cautious but successful (even by Republicans in the state), creating a large state surplus and permitting him to cut taxes. "Mr. *****'s record," reported the Wall Street Journal in 1992, "is one of a genuinely fiscally conservative Democrat." Stressing fiscal responsibility, lower taxes, job creation and lean government, Governor ***** has a lot of remarkable achievements, including eight years without raising taxes; the greatest single tax cut and largest budget surplus in state history; national leadership in moving people from welfare to work; more money for schools every year; high academic standards and new college opportunities; over 350,000 new jobs; tougher laws on crime; and improved environmental quality. He passed the 21st Century Scholars in 1992, which says that to every child growing up in ***** that is eligible for the free lunch program in a public school, if they graduate from high school with passing grades, and sign a pledge not to experiment with illegal drugs, everyone of them is entitled a full college scholarship to a public university of their choice. By the end of his second term ***** had an approval rating of nearly 80 percent.

***** was elected to the U.S. Senate in 1998 to the seat that was once held by *******. He defeated ****** with 64% of the vote, the largest victory margin ever by a Democrat in a U.S. Senate race in ******. He easily won reelection in 2004. He serves on six Senate committees: Banking Housing and Urban Affairs, on which he is the Ranking Member of the Subcommittee on International Trade and Finance; Armed Services; the Select Committee on Intelligence; Energy and Natural Resources; the Special Committee on Aging; and the Small Business Committee.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
JI7 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-27-05 11:45 PM
Response to Original message
1. i would probably ask what their position on abortion rights was
in addition to other things.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nickshepDEM Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-27-05 11:46 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. Pro-choice, but does not support late term abortions.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leftstreet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-27-05 11:47 PM
Response to Original message
3. What's his plan for singlepayer health care? n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nickshepDEM Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-27-05 11:47 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. Honestly, not sure.
Im bascially just asking you to evaluate his record as a springboard to running for president.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leftstreet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-27-05 11:50 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. I don't think we'll know til after 06
A strong Dem shift would change the political atmosphere for 08.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ruggerson Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-27-05 11:54 PM
Response to Original message
6. Bayh? n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nickshepDEM Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-27-05 11:57 PM
Response to Reply #6
8. Hey! No names!
Im trying to test people here.

;)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LiberalFighter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-27-05 11:57 PM
Response to Original message
7. Had thought it was Bayh but he was never Lt Gov
And don't believe Bayh is a ranking member of any committee
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nickshepDEM Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-27-05 11:58 PM
Response to Reply #7
9. Yeah, I messed that part up.
Edited on Mon Nov-28-05 12:03 AM by nickshepDEM
It should read **** defeated ^^^^^^^^^ and ^^^^^^^^ went on to be ***** LT. Gov.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Awsi Dooger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-27-05 11:59 PM
Response to Original message
10. I certainly know who he is
Took about 30 seconds. I reject his presidential chances because that's essentially a transplanted Southern state and he'd lose by high single digits in his home state, IMO.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nickshepDEM Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-28-05 12:01 AM
Response to Reply #10
13. You really think so?
Edited on Mon Nov-28-05 12:01 AM by nickshepDEM
The Indy Star conducted a poll several months ago that showed something like 47% of the state would support him in a presidential run while 35% or so would not. The rest were undecided. Those numbers look very promising.

If I have time Ill dig up the poll.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Awsi Dooger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-28-05 12:08 AM
Response to Reply #13
18. Here's the presidential partisanship chart for Indiana
In relation to the national average:

Indiana:
'88: Bush (59.84 - 39.69) = + 12.43% Republican
'92: Bush (42.91 - 36.79) = + 11.68% Republican
'96: Dole (47.13 - 41.55) = + 14.11% Republican
'00: Bush (56.65 - 41.01) = + 16.15% Republican
'04: Bush (59.94 - 39.26) = + 18.22% Republican

I don't like our chances to overcome a tilt that's considerable and apparently growing. Admittedly, we haven't campaigned there in recent cycles so you can take a few points off the top. A favorite son would be worth at least 6 points and probably more like 9-10. So high single digits is probably exaggeration but at least I'm going in the right direction. I used to insist he'd lose by low double digits.

I'm sure he would lose. The polls right now overstate Democrats by a few points due to the prolonged implosion by the GOP. A current poll would probably place his chances even better than one from a few months ago but I'm not buying it projected to 2008.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ediacara Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-28-05 12:00 AM
Response to Original message
11. This sounds exactly like Bayh
I don't need to google.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
On the Road Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-28-05 12:00 AM
Response to Original message
12. Seems Electable on the Basis of His Record
however, from the way the article is written, his priorities might not excite the Democratic base, nor should they. I am glad so many Democrats have become discipline spenders; but I'm not particularly enamored of those who site that as their main achievement.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
welshTerrier2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-28-05 12:02 AM
Response to Original message
14. No position on Iraq?
not enough info ...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nickshepDEM Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-28-05 12:04 AM
Response to Reply #14
15. Staunch supporter of the initial invasion.
Pretty sure he's a stay the course guy though.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pithy Cherub Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-28-05 12:06 AM
Response to Reply #14
16. A big ole AYE on IWR and proud of it too.
Edited on Mon Nov-28-05 12:07 AM by Pithy Cherub
:puke: It is none other than Evan "Buh" Bayh.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
welshTerrier2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-28-05 12:50 AM
Response to Reply #16
23. on your rec ...
or at least i think it was your rec, i just started reading "All the Kings Men" ... remarkable so far ...

as for Mr. Bayh, all i can say is that i will not be voting for any misguided war supporter ... it's been appalling to see so much campaign literature published so early that contains nothing about foreign policy or more specifically Iraq ...

it appears the political calculations have been made and this issue is a BIG LOSER among those who are regular contributors ... maybe instead of pretending we haven't noticed they're avoiding the issue, they should change their positions ... or they could even, god forbid, consider representing us ...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pithy Cherub Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-28-05 01:16 AM
Response to Reply #23
25. Glad you are enjoying that true classic!
The misguided population of Iraq policy ditherers, will not speak openly until the winds of fortune state their name, rank and serial number with a moneyback guarantee. An expedited exit plan with the least amount of spilled blood, both Iraqi and American, is keenly important to me. One can not speak about exiting Iraq credibly, unless one has overtly demonstrated the courage to call out the odious behavior of the Bush administration and how this mess came to be. If IWR voters or Iraq war supporters are saying withdraw and speak of no accountability for those who got America into this nightmare, well they deserve escalated compounded interest on derision and contempt.

Money is playing a key role right now for 2008 not visible to the average voter. The PAC's are fundraising, but the usual big money is not flowing into certain people's hands. It is amusing. Case in point, Biden (ugh) made certain to speak to not his ideas for being president on MTP, but said IF he could raise the money in the next six months he would run. Third way advocate centrist, Warner came with his hand out to California a while back and it was not pretty, not pretty at all. Hillary, of course, is still collecting cash and if she is doing senatorial stuff, she has a husband, that well, just blows the bank vault doors open really easily.

Money talks first. Then the representation. Fact of political life -that many follow to their peril.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mass Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-28-05 12:07 AM
Response to Original message
17. I think he is a serious candidate.
I am not saying I would support him. I disagree with him on many points, but he has the experience that is necessary to make a president.

But at least, if the ones I favor were not candidates when the time comes for me to vote, I would know where he stands and that he has the experiences necessary to do the job (more than I can say for some).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MADem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-28-05 01:22 AM
Response to Reply #17
26. I do too--if he decides to run, he could easily break out
He has VERY good TV presence, and nowadays, campaigns are all about TV. If he can keep his press posse jazzed up, and get good footage on the nightlies, ya never know.

Who thought Clinton would go all the way at the outset? That guy was written off like a bad debt by dozens of pundits and DC insiders...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pennylane100 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-28-05 12:10 AM
Response to Original message
19. He or she sounds great but without a name I could not be sure who it is.
While I think this is a trick question and this person is one of the top people in the senate, I still think it is important the know the name and track record of anyone I endorse.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nickshepDEM Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-28-05 12:18 AM
Response to Reply #19
20. Evan Bayh.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pennylane100 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-28-05 12:25 AM
Response to Reply #20
22. Unfortunately I could not vote for him
based on what I know so far. I believe he is anti-choice and that is my number one dis-qualifier. I am more flexible on other positions but if a candidate cannot concede that a woman must control her own body, they have no business representing me in the democratic party (In my opinion).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tritsofme Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-28-05 12:24 AM
Response to Original message
21. Bayh v Allen would be an interesting matchup
Two guys who got where they are today from their daddy's name...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
karynnj Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-28-05 01:03 AM
Response to Original message
24. Bayh
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun May 05th 2024, 11:56 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC