Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

In this morning's PR speech, Bush now calls Insurgents "REJECTIONISTS"

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
cyberpj Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-30-05 11:23 AM
Original message
In this morning's PR speech, Bush now calls Insurgents "REJECTIONISTS"
Edited on Wed Nov-30-05 11:23 AM by cyberpj
in·sur·gent (in-sûr?j?nt) adjective
Rising in revolt against civil authority or a government in power; rebellious.
noun
1. One that revolts against civil authority.
2. A member of a political party who rebels against its leadership.

I couldn't find an entry for REJECTIONIST but here's rejection:

re·jec·tion (ri-jek?sh?n) noun
1. The act of rejecting or the state of being rejected.
2. Something rejected.
3. Medicine. The failure of a recipient's body to accept a transplanted tissue or organ as the result of immunological incompatability; immunological resistance to foreign tissue.

I guess he actually has a point there...



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
ISUGRADIA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-30-05 11:24 AM
Response to Original message
1. REJECTIONISTS? wtf!
this must be newspeak, double plus good...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Crayson Donating Member (463 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-30-05 11:45 AM
Response to Reply #1
7. Sounds like a religion to me....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jackbourassa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-01-05 02:48 AM
Response to Reply #7
25. Is rejectionist even a word?
I've never heard that word used until now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LittleClarkie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-01-05 02:51 AM
Response to Reply #25
26. No, but neither is "Saddamist"
The Shrub was on a roll today.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wryter2000 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-30-05 11:25 AM
Response to Original message
2. I heard that
Reminded me of when Raygun got all petulant and said, "I'm not going to call them contras. I'm going to call the freedom fighters." He can call them rutabagas, if he wants. That doesn't change reality.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cyberpj Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-30-05 11:27 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. Rutabagas......(chuckle)
Edited on Wed Nov-30-05 11:27 AM by cyberpj
Hi wryter2000 :hi:

Too bad we didn't have a Bingo card for this one, huh?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wryter2000 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-30-05 05:29 PM
Response to Reply #3
18. Yeah
But I was in the bathtub and would have gotten the card wet. :evilgrin:

:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jaxx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-30-05 11:29 AM
Response to Original message
4. What was the name of that War on Terror this week?
Same old shit with a couple new words. 35 pages of same ol same ol. He said nothing new, just spit out what he knows best..........we're gonna win or we'll never leave. And if he has his way, we won't ever leave.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Yoda Yada Donating Member (474 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-30-05 04:52 PM
Response to Reply #4
15. They're trying for "War on Humanity" instead of "War on Terror". n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
slor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-30-05 11:34 AM
Response to Original message
5. We would not be fighting "rejectionists" if...
Edited on Wed Nov-30-05 11:38 AM by slor
he had allowed the "Inspectionists" to finish their jobs, and allowed the world to have seen that the WMDs were a lie.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cyberpj Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-30-05 03:54 PM
Response to Reply #5
10. Good one.
And they'd better be careful because their new word sounds a lot like "Protectionists" --as in those who can't let go of their oil.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Contrary1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-30-05 05:00 PM
Response to Reply #10
17. And after hearing what Slumpy had to say today...
I became a projectionist. :puke:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Richardo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-30-05 04:41 PM
Response to Reply #5
13. .
:spray:

"Inspectionists" :rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Velveteen Ocelot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-30-05 11:42 AM
Response to Original message
6. Oh, good grief. The speechwriters and policy whores at the WH must have
just about popped a cranial artery or two coming up with that one. "Rejectionist" really flows trippingly off the tongue, doesn't it? I do like that definition, "resistance to foreign tissue." Wonder how long it will be before Pox News starts using the new word? George Orwell would be so proud.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
keta11 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-30-05 11:45 AM
Response to Original message
8. Are they also suicidalists?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
VaYallaDawg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-30-05 11:46 AM
Response to Original message
9. I can't imagine him getting his JBeam-slurred tongue around that one
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
truthisfreedom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-30-05 04:28 PM
Response to Original message
11. yeah, right. remember when they floated "homicide bombers?" or
that stupid acronym as the replacement for "war on terrah?"

watch for this wordplay to disappear within a month.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dark Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-30-05 04:31 PM
Response to Original message
12. I would think that 'Seditionists' would benefit Bush better.
Anarchist also seems more applicable to Bush's standards.

Rejectionist doesn't have the same menacing tone that those have to scare people.

Maybe they are trying to downplay the insurgency, make it seem like nothing more than a minor irritation. . .
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Yoda Yada Donating Member (474 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-30-05 04:49 PM
Response to Original message
14. They're desperate to find the right "word spin". n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jokerman93 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-30-05 05:00 PM
Response to Original message
16. This is so over the top!
Edited on Wed Nov-30-05 05:00 PM by jokerman93
~Saddam-ists

~Rejection-ists

~Terra-ists

Now, THAT covers just about everybody - even me! I reject Bush's war.

Seriously, who the HELL gets paid to make this sh*t up??? :wtf:

I think we should call his bluff and start a rejectionist movement in the U.S.. Let's see if Bush wants to fight the "rejectionists" here instead of there.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cyberpj Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-30-05 09:09 PM
Response to Reply #16
19. The U.S. Rejectionist movement just isn't called that.
That would take some really really large ones.

But it exists.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-30-05 09:25 PM
Response to Original message
20. "Rejectionists" actually
sounds better to me..more appropriate.

Did they do a test audience with that?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hadrons Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-30-05 09:44 PM
Response to Original message
21. rejectionists = rejects = losers (per The Cunning Realist)
someone also posted there:

Actually, 'rejectionist' is not new (though it might not have made the dictionaries.) Back in the '70s, Palestinian groups who rejected the idea of any peace with Israel, and would work to scuttle any agreement that (e.g.) got back only some of the original Palestine, were called 'rejectionists'. (George Habash, for instance.)


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
No Exit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-30-05 11:27 PM
Response to Original message
22. Just like Burke and Hare in the 19th century!
Oh... wait... those were resurrectionists.

Well, with his pronunciations, it hardly matters.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
win_in_06 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-01-05 01:16 AM
Response to Original message
23. Rove has been burning the midnight oil to come up with that one
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Morning Dew Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-01-05 02:04 AM
Response to Original message
24. Are "rejectionists" related to
the "dead enders" that we cleared out so long ago?

How long before they're in the final throes?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dr Fate Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-01-05 02:52 AM
Response to Reply #24
27. The Rejectionists. The Dead Enders. They sound like Punk band names. n/t
Edited on Thu Dec-01-05 02:52 AM by Dr Fate
n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ngGale Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-01-05 03:03 AM
Response to Original message
28. Iraq is rejecting our occupation...
of their country.:evilgrin:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 02nd 2024, 03:24 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC