Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Rummy declared insurgents would,henceforth, no longer be called insurgents

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
dajoki Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-30-05 02:23 PM
Original message
Rummy declared insurgents would,henceforth, no longer be called insurgents
WP
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2005/11/29/AR2005112901405.html?referrer=email&referrer=email

Rumsfeld's War On 'Insurgents'

By Dana Milbank

Wednesday, November 30, 2005; Page A18

Last weekend, while other Americans were watching football and eating leftover turkey, Defense Secretary Donald H. Rumsfeld ended the Iraqi insurgency.

It was easy, really: He declared that the insurgents would, henceforth, no longer be called insurgents.

"Over the weekend, I thought to myself, 'You know, that gives them a greater legitimacy than they seem to merit,' " Rumsfeld, at a Pentagon briefing yesterday, said of his ban on the I-word. "It was an epiphany," he added, throwing his hands in the air.

Encouraging reporters to consult their dictionaries, the defense secretary said: "These people aren't trying to promote something other than disorder, and to take over that country and turn it into a caliphate and then spread it around the world. This is a group of people who don't merit the word 'insurgency,' I think."

Joint Chiefs of Staff Chairman Gen. Peter Pace, standing at Rumsfeld's side, evidently didn't get the memo about the wording change. Describing combat in Iraq, he paused and said, "I have to use the word 'insurgent' because I can't think of a better word right now."

" 'Enemies of the legitimate Iraqi government' -- how's that?" Rumsfeld proposed. ELIG
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
kenny blankenship Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-30-05 02:25 PM
Response to Original message
1. I know !! In the spirit of renaming "french" foods
we'll call them Freedom Fighters.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
louis-t Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-30-05 02:25 PM
Response to Original message
2. Insanity. I can't think of a better word right now.
Rummy ought to be locked up.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dajoki Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-30-05 02:38 PM
Response to Reply #2
8. who could disagree with you?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bluesplayer Donating Member (660 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-30-05 02:27 PM
Response to Original message
3. Why don't we call them "redcoats?"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dajoki Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-30-05 02:40 PM
Response to Reply #3
10. yeah,
Cheney did try to compare this to the American Revolution.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-30-05 02:27 PM
Response to Original message
4. War of the Gargantuans comes to mind....
Edited on Wed Nov-30-05 02:27 PM by blm
There was no other way to translate from the Japanese, so the declaration from the Defense Commander ended up like this:

From now on the Green Gargantuan will be called the GREEN GARGANTUAN. And the Brown Gargantuan will be called the BROWN GARGANTUAN.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
liberal N proud Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-30-05 02:32 PM
Response to Original message
5. And these monsters have control of our government and some
really big explosive devices.

Now that is something to FEAR!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dajoki Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-30-05 02:41 PM
Response to Reply #5
12. in the hands of these whackos...
that is scary.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Yoda Yada Donating Member (474 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-30-05 02:36 PM
Response to Original message
6. Why not call them Iraqis?
I thought only about 7% of the "insurgents" were from other countries....and the rest were Iraqis who just want their country back.

They need to fan the flames of civil war in order to do that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tsuki Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-03-05 01:47 AM
Response to Reply #6
48. I thought that they were claiming that most of the in...errr...ELIG
were from other countries. Have they changed that lie? Too many lies, too little time to keep up.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LoKnLoD Donating Member (923 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-30-05 02:37 PM
Response to Original message
7. ok since no one else brought it up
Edited on Wed Nov-30-05 02:38 PM by LoKnLoD
ARTHUR: O Knights of Ni, we have brought you your shrubbery. May we go now?
HEAD KNIGHT: It is a good shrubbery. I like the laurels articularly,... but there is one small problem.
ARTHUR: What is that?
HEAD KNIGHT: We are now... no longer the Knights Who Say 'Ni'.
KNIGHTS OF NI: Ni! Shh!
HEAD KNIGHT: Shh! We are now the Knights Who Say 'Ecky- ecky- ecky- ecky- pikang- zoop- boing- goodem- zoo- owli- zhiv'.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dajoki Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-30-05 02:43 PM
Response to Reply #7
13. LOL!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Burma Jones Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-30-05 02:49 PM
Response to Reply #7
18. oops.....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NoFederales Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-30-05 02:39 PM
Response to Original message
9. How about 'freedom fighters' Rumsfeld?
NoFederales
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
0007 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-30-05 02:41 PM
Response to Original message
11.  Rummy is busy playing checkers
while junior is crying his eyes out.

There are so many terms for insurgents, take your pick.
1.) anarchist
2.) extremist
3.) freedom fighters
4.) insurrectionist
5.) mutineer
6.) resister
7.) revolutionary
8.) terrorist
9.) radical


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dajoki Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-30-05 02:45 PM
Response to Reply #11
16. they would use many...
of those words to describe us!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
joanski0 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-30-05 02:43 PM
Response to Original message
14. Well, I guess they settled on "rejectionists",
All of the neocons are insane, including Joe Lieberman.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SnowGoose Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-30-05 02:45 PM
Response to Original message
15. Well, considering how well "homocide bombers" worked
as a meme, who can blame him?

I mean we hear that term all the time, right?

Sheesh... can I please just wake up from this bad dream already?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dajoki Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-01-05 10:49 PM
Response to Reply #15
46. faux...
still insists on using that term.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Burma Jones Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-30-05 02:49 PM
Response to Original message
17. So Now They're the Knights that say:
"Ekky-ekky-ekky-ekky-z'Bang, zoom-Boing, z'nourrrwringmm"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CTyankee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-30-05 02:50 PM
Response to Original message
19. That'll do it! Just change the word! Victory is ours!
Oy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dajoki Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-30-05 11:24 PM
Response to Reply #19
31. they love their slogans n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
beingthere Donating Member (215 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-30-05 02:51 PM
Response to Original message
20. Let's bring back a term from about 25 years ago
--for Rummy et al, how about "ratfinks"? It's an epiphany! Throw your hands in the air!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
4MoreYearsOfHell Donating Member (943 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-30-05 03:04 PM
Response to Original message
21. This is NOT without precedent, you know...
"We actually misnamed the war on terror, it ought to be the struggle against ideological extremists who do not believe in free societies who happen to use terror as a weapon to try to shake the conscience of the free world."

GWB President's Remarks to the Unity Journalists of Color Convention
August 6, 2004

Why use "war on terror" when "TSAIEWDNBIFSWHTUTAAWTTTSTCOTFW" works just as well...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dajoki Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-30-05 03:06 PM
Response to Reply #21
22. love the acronym n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
4MoreYearsOfHell Donating Member (943 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-30-05 03:20 PM
Response to Reply #22
24. Thanks - Notice that you can not spell
TSAIEWDNBIFSWHTUTAAWTTTSTCOTFW without WTF...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dajoki Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-30-05 03:31 PM
Response to Reply #24
25. thanks for pointing that out!!
Edited on Wed Nov-30-05 03:36 PM by dajoki
just got a funny thought; shrub trying to use that in a speech, his head might explode.:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sinkingfeeling Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-30-05 03:18 PM
Response to Original message
23. Oh, damn! Now they'll have to reprint that 'National Strategy for
Victory in Iraq' brochure over since it uses 'insurgents'!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dajoki Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-30-05 03:34 PM
Response to Reply #23
26. uh-oh...
somebody fucked up.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lone_Wolf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-30-05 03:56 PM
Response to Original message
27. Rebels has a good ring to it...
n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
VaYallaDawg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-30-05 03:59 PM
Response to Original message
28. What he'd prefer is a one-syllable word to fit on a bumper sticker
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dajoki Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-30-05 11:30 PM
Response to Reply #28
32. something catchy...
to try and fool the people.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cyberpj Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-30-05 03:59 PM
Response to Original message
29. In this morning's PR speech, Bush now calls Insurgents "REJECTIONISTS"
I also read that the word "rejectionist" is used some 13 or 14 times in the new plan for victory document.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dajoki Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-30-05 09:53 PM
Response to Reply #29
30. Rummy' suggestion...
" 'Enemies of the legitimate Iraqi government' -- how's that?" Rumsfeld proposed. ELIG
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
upi402 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-30-05 11:35 PM
Response to Original message
33. '...and lo, there were Saddamist'
PC speech attempting to fix a real world problem leaves me with that honey-covered cotton candy, dry heaving, retching feeling.:puke:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cassiepriam Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-01-05 07:10 AM
Response to Original message
34. They just make this crap up as they go along.
Edited on Thu Dec-01-05 07:11 AM by cassiepriam
The truth is the Iraqis fighting us are patriotic Iraqis,
defending their country.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NoPasaran Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-01-05 08:27 AM
Response to Original message
35. UPDATE: They're no longer shooting bullets at us either!
Turns out they're throwing flowers. High velocity, lead flowers.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Spinzonner Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-01-05 08:42 AM
Response to Original message
36. If Rummy had spent a fraction of the time he wastes on verbal games

on properly equipping and deploying the troops, maybe Iraq would only be half the disater he and the neocons have made it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Toots Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-01-05 10:07 AM
Response to Original message
37.  If they are not called terrorists then the war is not against terrorism
But everybody knows they are only Iraqis fighting a foreign occupation. IMO this is an open admission that the war in iraq is not about terrorism...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dajoki Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-01-05 02:17 PM
Response to Reply #37
38. it never was...
until we made it that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mmonk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-01-05 02:19 PM
Response to Original message
39. I don't think they care
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
obreaslan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-01-05 02:34 PM
Response to Original message
40. How about Petroleum Obstruction Engineers...
Since what Rummy is basically pissed at is that they are keeping us from stealing the oil in a timely manner.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Disturbed Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-01-05 05:33 PM
Response to Reply #40
41. Gen Pace was laughing at the absurdity of
Rumsfailed's epiphany. Gen. Pace must be in an awkward situation haviong to deal with Rumsfailed, the person that screwed up the US Occupation of Iraq.




Rumsfailed Admitted to Violating Geneva Convention

Rumsfailed admitted in public on TV that when CIA Director Tenet requested that an Iraqi prisoner be sent to a secret Afghan/US Prison that Rumsfailed did so. After four months a DOD Attorney stated that this was an illegal act. Rumsfailed then ordered that this prisoner be sent back to Abu Graihib but the prisoner was purposefully not listed at that location, also an illegal act. Rumsfeld also admitted to signing orders for tougher interogation methods which violated the Geneva Conventions.

Rumfailed has commited at least three violations of the Geneva Convention thereby also violations of The Constitution of the USA. Recently it has been found out that even more detainees were "ghost detainees". The fact that Rumsfailed and Tenet have not been charged speaks volumes. If Congress wishes to garner any respect they should move forward with Rep. Rangle's Impeachment Declaration of Rumsfailed and also prosecute Ex. CIA Tenet.

The US, Govt., Congress, and the Justice Dept no longer abide by the Geneva Convention or the Constitution of the USA.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dajoki Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-01-05 09:02 PM
Response to Reply #41
44. The secretary recoiled in mock horror...
"What the secretary said," Pace continued, to laughter. But Rumsfeld's new description -- ELIG, if you prefer an acronym -- didn't stick with the general. Smiling, he uttered the forbidden word again while discussing explosive devices.

The secretary recoiled in mock horror. "Sorry, sir," Pace explained. "I'm not trainable today."

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Vickers Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-01-05 05:37 PM
Response to Original message
42. Does that dumbfuck OWN a dictionary?
"a condition of revolt against a recognized government"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
POAS Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-01-05 05:38 PM
Response to Original message
43. How about if we just call them Iraqis? n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leesa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-01-05 10:28 PM
Response to Original message
45. Didn't he change the term 'war' the last time things were going really
badly? What was the term? Bush was no longer the 'war president' he was the 'ongoing conflict president' or some damned thing

This guy belongs in a straight jacket! Wonder if Richard Clark still considers this homicidal maniac his best friend?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dajoki Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-03-05 12:27 AM
Response to Reply #45
47. which time was that?
Rumsfeld said the insurgency "could go on for any number of years."

"Insurgencies tend to go on five, six, eight, 10, 12 years," Rumsfeld said. "Coalition forces, foreign forces are not going to repress that insurgency. We're going to create an environment that the Iraqi people and the Iraqi security forces can win against that insurgency."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rageneau Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-03-05 01:50 AM
Response to Original message
49. Boogeymen? Outsurgents? Evildoers? Klingons?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tirechewer Donating Member (280 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-03-05 04:46 AM
Response to Original message
50. He had an Epiphany
Rumsfeld can just bite me. Lets not call it crap and see if it smells like flowers.

I have my own Epiphany. People who love torture are not what I consider human. Rummy loves torture. He even makes suggestions. So let's stop calling him human. Scum fits him better. Let him insurge that.

I know. I should stop pussyfooting around and say what I really think.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 02nd 2024, 01:25 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC