Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Bush cited as breaking ‘no comment’ policy (Delay)

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
underpants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-16-05 08:42 AM
Original message
Bush cited as breaking ‘no comment’ policy (Delay)
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/10486164/

Updated: 8:17 p.m. ET Dec. 15, 2005
WASHINGTON - The White House on Thursday defended President Bush’s decision to insert himself into Tom DeLay’s legal case, saying Bush was employing “presidential prerogative” when he declared the former House majority leader was innocent of criminal charges in Texas.

On Wednesday, Bush was asked during an interview on Fox News Channel whether he believed DeLay was innocent. “Yes, I do,” Bush replied.


“We don’t typically tend to get into discussing legal matters of that nature. But in this instance, the president chose to respond to it,” White House press secretary Scott McClellan said. “Call it presidential prerogative.”



Accused of being inconsistent
Bush’s support of DeLay drew criticism from Sen. Charles Schumer, D-N.Y., who told the president in a letter, “You were willing to break your stated policy of not commenting on pending investigations to express clear and unequivocal support for Tom DeLay.”

McClellan denied there was any inconsistency between the president’s remarks in the DeLay case and the White House’s “no comments” in the CIA matter, because the CIA case involves a continuing investigation affecting the Bush administration and the DeLay’s is further along in the legal process. McClellan also noted that the White House has commented previously on legal matters, such as charges against former Iraqi leader Saddam Hussein.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
BobBoudelangFan69 Donating Member (171 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-16-05 08:48 AM
Response to Original message
1. After Presidential Pardon, Can Delay Return To HOR?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Robert Cooper Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-16-05 08:59 AM
Response to Original message
2. Can you say "Jury Tampering"?
President of the United States / former governor of Texas declares he's "innocent".

It's "presidential prerogative" to tamper with justice?

Why am I not surprised? :eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
C_U_L8R Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-16-05 09:13 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. Delay-Tactic may not be really helpful
to Delay that is.

Consider that most Americans think Dubya is a liar...
so naturally his claim that Delay is innocent
means that he is guilty as sin.
Just another example of Upside Down & Backwards Bush Bizarro World (tm)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Robert Cooper Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-16-05 11:15 AM
Response to Reply #3
10. You are quite right...
...or should I say "wrong"? ;-)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
underpants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-16-05 09:16 AM
Response to Original message
4. OOPS! Sorry DUPE see LBN here
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BikeWriter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-16-05 09:22 AM
Response to Original message
5. The pResident is now the Judicial Branch?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ladjf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-16-05 09:27 AM
Response to Original message
6. The "flim-flam" continues. A regular American citizen would
be prosecuted for jury tampering.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
4bucksagallon Donating Member (324 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-16-05 09:30 AM
Response to Original message
7. "Your doing a fine job Brownie"
Looks like another kiss of death, to me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
underpants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-16-05 09:40 AM
Response to Reply #7
9. Welcome to DU 4bucks
:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
robbedvoter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-16-05 09:32 AM
Response to Original message
8. "Doing a heck of a job Brownie" was in the same vein
Little turd is so arrogant, he thinks that his opinion can trump not just public opinion, but that of a judger as well.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-16-05 11:25 PM
Response to Original message
11. Kick
:kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 01st 2024, 01:43 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC