nickshepDEM
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Dec-19-05 11:11 AM
Original message |
|
Edited on Mon Dec-19-05 11:13 AM by nickshepDEM
I can see how bad Bush is at this press conference stuff. He's horrible on the stump, no denying that.
I often hear how good Clinton was. But really, how good was he? Were his press conferences much more fulfilling to watch?
|
tecelote
(645 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Dec-19-05 11:12 AM
Response to Original message |
Pirate Smile
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Dec-19-05 11:14 AM
Response to Original message |
2. Clinton knew details, policy and had insight and empathy. |
|
It is so different it is amazing.
|
karynnj
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Dec-19-05 12:20 PM
Response to Original message |
3. Clinton's SOTU were long, detailed and informative, |
|
but so well done you listened to the whole thing and were surprised how much time went by. He was charismatic and while you were listening you suspended any disbelieve. He gave a SOTU in the midst of the worst of the Monica saga and his numbers went up.
Was he inspiring? - I don't really think so - he was likable and a leader but I don't think he took the opportunity to lead. Partly not his fault because of the hate he faced, but partially because he might have been a better politician than statesman - though he did use his amazing intelligence to try to solve the Mid-east problem.
But in the last 50 years, I would say that the only inspiring Presidents were JFK and Reagan (who was inspiring but took people in the wrong direction.) One loss last year, was that I really think Kerry had the temperment and the eloquence to be an inspiring President.
|
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Fri May 03rd 2024, 02:32 PM
Response to Original message |