Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

A Conservative Blogger Really Gets It

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
AtomicKitten Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-21-05 11:45 PM
Original message
A Conservative Blogger Really Gets It
from AMERICAblog.com
A conservative blogger weighs in on modern conservatism:

"I almost feel I don't know these people anymore. It seems now they feel government cannot have nearly enough power. Secret courts, secret warrants, secret prisons, suspect torture, massive data gathering on all aspects of US citizens including medical records, library records, and financial records are all wonderful things. They hold up the Patriot Act as a great piece of legislation that the Bush Whitehouse pushed through to combat terrorism (little seem to understand most of it was written during Clinton's years).

I truly and honestly do not understand. People who once proudly quoted Franklin's "Those who give up essential liberty for a little safety deserve neither" now cheerlead the executive branch on in removing any judicial oversight, congressional oversight, and in fact ANY oversight (as most of these laws are secret) from the land. Far from the transparent government the founders imagined, we are now entering a system where laws are kept secret, prosecutions are kept secret, and national security is a password to removing any and all liberty that stands in the way of anything government wishes to do....

People who support a clandestine program of warrantless domestic spying are not “conservatives” or “libertarians.” Neither are people who support the creation of a worldwide archipelago of secret torture sites. Neither are people who support the usurpation of the functions of government by the executive branch; who espouse the theory that the executive branch is the final arbiter of the legality of the actions of the executive branch; and who call for the investigation or prosecution of a free press that dares to report on the executive branch’s secret programs of domestic spying and outsourced torture.

Those people, my friends, are called the radical right."



more at: http://www.michaelberube.com/index.php/weblog/they_hate_our_freedoms/

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Cha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-21-05 11:49 PM
Response to Original message
1. And they're Radically
Wrong!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
quiet.american Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-21-05 11:52 PM
Response to Original message
2. Who knew Clinton would turn out to be the beacon of "conservatives."
They cannot make a move without reference to the Big Dog. Thing is, they always leave out the fine print as to what Clinton did, and there is always fine print. "Conservatives" and Kool-aid drinkers like this fellow are always an enigma to me. I knew in 1999 that Junior was an idiot, a murderous man-child (national record for executions, without any hint of humanity or conscience, for one), and unworthy of the office of POTUS.

Now these idiots have buyer's remorse?!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
radio4progressives Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-21-05 11:54 PM
Response to Original message
3. kicked and recommended!
:kick: :hi: :applause: :hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Supersedeas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-22-05 05:13 PM
Response to Reply #3
18. this deserves a recommendation
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AtomicKitten Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-21-05 11:55 PM
Response to Original message
4. Ah, but if the radical wrong turn against the mothership,
it is they that will influence the red state representatives to perhaps entertain impeachment.

I must applaud this cosmic revelation on their part because it could be the crack in their solidarity.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bvar22 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-22-05 12:42 AM
Response to Original message
5. My new bumpersticker:


Goes on the car tomorrow.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AtomicKitten Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-22-05 12:49 AM
Response to Reply #5
7. Bravo!
I want one too!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
buddysmellgood Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-22-05 01:09 AM
Response to Reply #5
8. SWEET!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Eric J in MN Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-22-05 12:49 AM
Response to Original message
6. Thanks. Unfortunately, people who describe themselves as
conservatives and oppose Bush's destruction of civil liberties are rare.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
buddysmellgood Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-22-05 01:10 AM
Response to Original message
9. Hmmmm. Except for the dig at Clinton... sounds like a Librul.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AtomicKitten Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-22-05 01:19 AM
Response to Reply #9
10. Either that or a compliment to Clinton,
basically saying they plagiarized it.

Ps: I doubt very seriously the Big Dawg authored that turd.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bobbieinok Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-22-05 04:26 AM
Response to Reply #10
11. when I said instant readiness of Patriot Act helped convince me LIHOP
or maybe even MIHOP, several at DU said most of Act was prepared by Clinton

would like to know if this claim is correct
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gratuitous Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-22-05 09:35 AM
Response to Reply #11
13. Well, it WAS mostly written during Clinton's years
By our friends in PNAC. When their puppet got installed by the Supreme Court, they just waited for their Reichstag Fire moment, and had their little bundle of fascism all ready to go.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
crispini Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-22-05 08:29 AM
Response to Original message
12. K&R.
:thumbsup:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
info being Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-22-05 10:10 AM
Response to Original message
14. They think the Republicans will always be in power
They support government power as long as it is their party..."them" who have it. They think this is a power grab to make sure no Liberals ever take control again, and they are fine with that. Get it?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AtomicKitten Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-22-05 11:59 AM
Response to Reply #14
15. sounds like some are having buyer's remorse.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Auntie Bush Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-22-05 08:45 PM
Response to Reply #14
21. They know they can depend on diebold...so ultimate power
for the president is a good thing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Boojatta Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-22-05 01:07 PM
Response to Original message
16. Are there any books that are classified as definitely okay to read?
Edited on Thu Dec-22-05 01:56 PM by Boojatta
"I almost feel I don't know these people anymore. It seems now they feel government cannot have nearly enough power. (...)massive data gathering on all aspects of US citizens including medical records, library records, and financial records are all wonderful things."

If someone borrows a copy of The Emperor's New Clothes by Hans Christian Andersen and the book is one week overdue, but the book is then returned and the fine is paid in full, then does that information stay on someone's permanent record? Does the federal government have no need for that information or might that information be part of a pattern of suspicious activity?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
greiner3 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-22-05 04:57 PM
Response to Original message
17. Sounds like a DU'er;
But I sense anger and sadness also. Maybe one has come in from the cold!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dr Fate Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-22-05 05:28 PM
Response to Original message
19. I have a similar sentiment- Who are these people?
???
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Arkham House Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-22-05 08:12 PM
Response to Original message
20. My congratulations to this gentleman...
...he sounds like exactly the sort of decent, principled conservative whom we on the Left could have an intelligent and educational national debate with--if our country had a modicum of sanity...as it happens, though, people like him and people like us might find ourselves in an uneasy alliance of patriots, to rid ourselves of a regime that even he seems to think borders on fascism. He doesn't quite bring himself to use the word...but his meaning, I think, is apparent...could we be facing another 1688--when Whigs and Tories combined to bring down the radical reactionary James II of Britain...?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GOPBasher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-23-05 12:00 AM
Response to Original message
22. That's refreshing. A conservative with sanity. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ddeclue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-23-05 12:04 AM
Response to Original message
23. AMEN!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 30th 2024, 12:29 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC