Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Your thoughts on Sen. Lincoln Chafee (R-RI)

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
brentspeak Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-22-05 06:00 PM
Original message
Your thoughts on Sen. Lincoln Chafee (R-RI)
Liberal Republican, good for the American people?

Phony moderate, good only to the Republicans?

Political independent, hard to get a grasp on ?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Bumblebee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-22-05 06:03 PM
Response to Original message
1. My thought is I will start fully respecting him -- and Snowe --
only when they stop being GOP and go Jeffords' way.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheCowsCameHome Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-22-05 06:05 PM
Response to Original message
2. The certainly do anger the extreme RW clowns within the party
and the RW blabbermouths like O'Lielly, HalfNutty, and Limpballs
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ticapnews Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-22-05 06:06 PM
Response to Original message
3. Any member of Congress who casts a vote for
a Republican to be Majority Leader or Speaker of the House is a bad one. Other votes are pretty much irrelevant. It's the first vote every two years that matters the most. Ben Nelson has a more conservative record than most Republicans, but he didn't vote for Bill Frist; Lincoln Chafee did.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bumblebee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-22-05 06:09 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. I am actually not sure Chafee did either -- did he?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
brentspeak Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-22-05 06:13 PM
Response to Reply #3
6. However, in the case of Bush in 2004
Chafee did something really out of the ordinary: He wrote in George H.W. Bush as a protest against Bush, Jr.

I don't know if it was a genuine gesture of protest, or a political stunt.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
safi0 Donating Member (993 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-22-05 06:17 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. I think it was as
A form of protest, but also keep in mind that this is a state where Bush was running 30 pts behind for much of the campaign so its not like Chaffee's vote really mattered.

As for my opinion of him, my first thought is ex. Sen because in 11 months he will be defeated.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
brentspeak Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-22-05 06:20 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. There's two Dems who'll be butting heads in the primary
Attorney Gen. Whitehouse, and some guy (forget his name) who's only 36 years old, but who's more conservative. Interesting to see what happens.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
safi0 Donating Member (993 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-22-05 06:29 PM
Response to Reply #8
12. I don't know
Who's more conservative. Both seem to come from the Jack Reed mold. I don't think there's a lto of difference between them ideologically which is why I think Whitehouse will win the primary. Because there's little difference between the two on the issues things lie fundraising and endorsements are going to be the decider and Whitehouse is outraising everyone in this race including Chaffee and he's been endorsed by both of RI's congressmen. Basically, I think the other guy, SOS Matt Brown, is a Reed endorsement of Whitehouse away from being dead.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tiggeroshii Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-22-05 06:36 PM
Response to Reply #7
15. By who?
The Republicans or Dems? Which one will oust him first?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
safi0 Donating Member (993 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-22-05 06:37 PM
Response to Reply #15
19. If Laffey ousts him
Well kick his ass in the GE, if he doesn't we'll kick Chaffee's ass in the GE
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tiggeroshii Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-22-05 06:55 PM
Response to Reply #19
28. Do you have a strong Dem that can do well against such a moderate
Republican?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
safi0 Donating Member (993 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-22-05 07:01 PM
Response to Reply #28
30. We did, but
NARAL pushed him out of the race.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SkiGuy Donating Member (451 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-22-05 07:02 PM
Response to Reply #30
31. Who are you referring to?
And one other question. Do you think Laffey's a nut case? I do.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
safi0 Donating Member (993 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-22-05 09:56 PM
Response to Reply #31
40. US Rep.
Jim Langevin. He led Chaffee in a poll 46-27 and was probably going to run but NARAL made a big stink about it and he decided not to. He would've won.

As far as Laffey goes I don't know enough to form an opinion about the guy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ck4829 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-22-05 06:08 PM
Response to Original message
4. I'd rather have them in charge instead of the Loonies and the Wackos
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Czolgosz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-22-05 06:21 PM
Response to Original message
9. For each moderate vote, he has 10 votes upholding the Bush regime.
He is nothing more that the Republican version of Lieberman. Reptilicans enjoy our frustration with Lieberman's disloyal votes, they'd still rather have a Reptilican in Lieberman's seat (if they could elect one, which they can't). Similarly, we may enjoy Chafee's votes and statements which show a lack of GOP unity, we're still far better off with a Democrat in Chafee's seat (and we can elect one).

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nutmegger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-22-05 06:21 PM
Response to Original message
10. He's not one of the yahoos in DC
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Peachhead22 Donating Member (798 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-22-05 06:26 PM
Response to Original message
11. He caucuses with the Republicans
End of story.

Allowing them to control committees, appoint shills like Frist and Roberts and control the agenda. He even votes with them often merely in the name of "party unity". He needs to change to Dem or Independent (even if he doesn't caucus with any party).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SkiGuy Donating Member (451 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-22-05 06:31 PM
Response to Original message
13. I don't trust him
Chafee's just too flip floppy for me
I'm going to vote for and support Matt Brown. http://www.mattbrown.org/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
brentspeak Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-22-05 06:36 PM
Response to Reply #13
17. Just checked his site out
His anti-lobbyist position is something I like.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SkiGuy Donating Member (451 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-22-05 06:43 PM
Response to Reply #17
24. Matt appears to be a nice, unassuming guy
with BIG balls!!
He wants a debate among the candidates about the Iraq war but everyone backs down.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Douglas Carpenter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-22-05 06:32 PM
Response to Original message
14. Chafee vs. Clinton vs. McCain -- here is their voting record based on
on interest group ratings:

This is courtesy of project vote smart - link:

http://www.vote-smart.org/index.htm
_____________________

2004 Senator Chafee supported the interests of the Nuclear Age Peace Foundation 33 percent in 2004.

Senator Clinton supported the interests of the Nuclear Age Peace Foundation 67 percent in 2004.

2004 Senator McCain supported the interests of the Nuclear Age Peace Foundation 0 percent in 2004.
_________________________________

2004 Senator Chafee supported the interests of the Peace Action 13 percent in 2004.

2004 Senator Clinton supported the interests of the Peace Action 75 percent in 2004.

2004 Senator McCain supported the interests of the Peace Action 13 percent in 2004.
______________________________________

2004 Senator Chafee supported the interests of the Friends Committee on National Legislation 0 percent in 2004.

2004 Senator Clinton supported the interests of the Friends Committee on National Legislation 50 percent in 2004.

2004 Senator McCain supported the interests of the Friends Committee on National Legislation 0 percent in 2004.
____________________________________________________

2004 Senator Chafee supported the interests of the National Abortion Reproductive Rights Action League 100 percent in 2004

2004 Senator Clinton supported the interests of the National Abortion Reproductive Rights Action League 100 percent in 2004.

2004 Senator McCain supported the interests of the National Abortion Reproductive Rights Action League 0 percent in 2004.
__________________

2003-2004 Senator Chafee supported the interests of the American Civil Liberties Union 67 percent in 2003-2004.

2003-2004 Senator Clinton supported the interests of the American Civil Liberties Union 78 percent in 2003-200

2003-2004 Senator McCain supported the interests of the American Civil Liberties Union 22 percent in 2003-2004.
_____________________________

2004 Senator Chafee supported the interests of the Americans for Democratic Action 55 percent in 2004.

2004 Senator Clinton supported the interests of the Americans for Democratic Action 95 percent in 2004

2004 Senator McCain supported the interests of the Americans for Democratic Action 35 percent in 2004.
__________________________

2004 Senator Chafee supported the interests of the AFL-CIO 58 percent in 2004

2004 Senator Clinton supported the interests of the AFL-CIO 100 percent in 2004.

2004 Senator McCain supported the interests of the AFL-CIO 33 percent in 2004.
_________________________

2004 Senator Chafee supported the interests of the United Auto Workers 36 percent in 2004.

2004 Senator Clinton supported the interests of the United Auto Workers 110 percent in 2004

2004 Senator McCain supported the interests of the United Auto Workers 9 percent in 2004.
__________________________

2003-2004 Senator Chafee supported the interests of the National Education Association 60 percent in 2003-2004

2003-2004 Senator Clinton supported the interests of the National Education Association 85 percent in 2003-2004.

2003-2004 Senator McCain supported the interests of the National Education Association 35 percent in 2003-2004.
______________________

2003-2004 Senator Chafee supported the interests of the Human Rights Campaign 88 percent in 2003-2004

2003-2004 Senator Clinton supported the interests of the Human Rights Campaign 88 percent in 2003-2004

2003-2004 Senator McCain supported the interests of the Human Rights Campaign 25 percent in 2003-2004.
_____________________________________

2003-2004 Senator Chafee supported the interests of the Leadership Conference on Civil Rights 43 percent in 2003-2004.

2003-2004 Senator Clinton supported the interests of the Leadership Conference on Civil Rights 100 percent in 2003-2004

2003-2004 Senator McCain supported the interests of the Leadership Conference on Civil Rights 14 percent in 2003-2004.
_____________________________

2004 Senator Chafee supported the interests of the Arab American Institute 100 percent in 2004

2004 Senator Clinton supported the interests of the Arab American Institute 25 percent in 2004.

2004 Senator McCain supported the interests of the Arab American Institute 0 percent in 2004.
__________________________

2004 Senator Chafee supported the interests of the Family Research Council 0 percent in 2004.

2004 Senator Clinton supported the interests of the Family Research Council 0 percent in
2004.

2004 Senator McCain supported the interests of the Family Research Council 67 percent in 2004.
____________________________

2004 Senator Chafee supported the interests of the Christian Coalition 50 percent in 2004.

2004 Senator Clinton supported the interests of the Christian Coalition 0 percent in 2004.

2004 Senator McCain supported the interests of the Christian Coalition 83 percent in 2004.
_____________________________

2004 Senator Chafee supported the interests of the American Conservative Union 40 percent in 2004.

2004 Senator Clinton supported the interests of the American Conservative Union 0 percent in 2004.

2004 Senator McCain supported the interests of the American Conservative Union 72 percent in 2004.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
noamnety Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-22-05 06:37 PM
Response to Reply #14
18. Clinton supported the UAW 110% of the time?
wow. :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Czolgosz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-22-05 06:41 PM
Response to Reply #18
23. lol
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Douglas Carpenter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-22-05 06:59 PM
Response to Reply #18
29. this is how they explained 110% on the UAW website:
New York - 2 Senate Members
Name 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Wgt
Clinton, Hillary ( D ) + + + + + + + + + + 110 %
Schumer, Charles ( D ) + + + + + + + + + + 110 %

** Those Senators who supported or provided other assistance in connection with a UAW organizing drive are given an extra 10% bonus in their UAW Support Percentage.

* Issues #2 (Overtime Pay) is highlighted because it was a priority UAW issues. Because of its importance, this vote is given double weight in this Voting Record.

link:

http://www.uaw.org/cap/05/rollcall/vote01.cfm
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
noamnety Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-22-05 08:11 PM
Response to Reply #29
37. Thanks for the explanation!
I looked around on the votesmart site and didn't see anything.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
brentspeak Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-22-05 06:39 PM
Response to Reply #14
21. Thanks for the info. How did you compute those percentages?
Is there a compare/contrast feature on the site?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
brentspeak Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-22-05 06:50 PM
Response to Reply #21
26. Nevermind, I figured it out
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Douglas Carpenter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-22-05 06:52 PM
Response to Reply #21
27. first put in the name of the Senator or member of Congress
then click on their name.

That will take you to their bio. Then click on Interest Group Ratings.

Then you just go through the different interest group subjects such as abortion of civil liberties or labor. Then just look down the list/

Vote Smart is a REALLY valuable tool

Here is the one direct for Sen. Chafee:

http://www.vote-smart.org/issue_rating_category.php?can_id=BRI43231

This direct for Sen. Clinton:

http://www.vote-smart.org/issue_rating_category.php?can_id=WNY99268

This is direct for Sen. McCain:

http://www.vote-smart.org/issue_rating_category.php?can_id=S0061103
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
brentspeak Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-22-05 07:07 PM
Response to Reply #27
33. I checked out the info on my House representative
Edited on Thu Dec-22-05 07:08 PM by brentspeak
Scott Garrett (R-NJ). I wasn't surprised to see this:

REPRESENTATIVE E. SCOTT GARRETT REPEATEDLY REFUSED TO PROVIDE ANY
RESPONSES TO CITIZENS ON ISSUES THROUGH THE 2004
NATIONAL POLITICAL AWARENESS TEST


REPRESENTATIVE E. SCOTT GARRETT REFUSED TO PROVIDE THIS INFORMATION WHEN ASKED TO DO SO BY:

Major News Organizations
and key national leaders of both parties including,

John McCain, Republican Senator
Geraldine Ferraro, Former Democratic Congresswoman
Michael Dukakis, Former Democratic Governor
Bill Frenzel, Former Republican Congressman
Richard Kimball, Project Vote Smart President


http://www.vote-smart.org/npat.php?can_id=BS022393
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Douglas Carpenter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-22-05 07:42 PM
Response to Reply #33
35. be sure and check his Interest Group ratings
Edited on Thu Dec-22-05 07:46 PM by Douglas Carpenter
he certainly looks like a REAL wingnut

link:

http://www.vote-smart.org/issue_rating_category.php?can_id=BS022393&type=category&category=Abortion%2BIssues&go.x=5&go.y=10

2005 In 2005 Citizens for Global Solutions gave Representative Garrett a rating of F.

2003-2004 Representative Garrett supported the interests of the American Civil Liberties Union 5 percent in 2003-2004

2004 Representative Garrett supported the interests of the Friends Committee on National Legislation 0 percent in 2004.

2004 Representative Garrett supported the interests of the Peace Action 0 percent in 2004.

2004 Representative Garrett supported the interests of the Nuclear Age Peace Foundation 33 percent in 2004.

2004 Representative Garrett supported the interests of the National Abortion Reproductive Rights Action League 0 percent in 2004.

2003-2004 Representative Garrett supported the interests of the Human Rights Campaign 11 percent in 2003-2004.

2003-2004 Representative Garrett supported the interests of the Leadership Conference on Civil Rights 0 percent in 2003-2004.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
brentspeak Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-22-05 08:23 PM
Response to Reply #35
38. He was a Club For Growth-sponsored candidate in 2002
Edited on Thu Dec-22-05 08:28 PM by brentspeak
Club For Growth = "Repeal the Estate Tax, but continue handing out corporate welfare checks, and send all jobs overseas" kind of organization.

It paid for anonymous attack ads telephone-spammed to all households of the 5th Congressional district for weeks -- ads attacking the Democratic candidate, featuring all kinds of phony allegations.

The harassing phone calls worked, and now we have a congressman who's way more RW than Republican Marge Roukema was during her 22 year term of service.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NJ Democrats Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-22-05 09:12 PM
Response to Reply #33
39. I know!
He is my congressman too, and he is an ass.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LynneSin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-22-05 06:36 PM
Response to Original message
16. Time to be replaced with a democrat
Nuff said. Unless they are willing to vote for Harry Reid as the majority leader they server no purpose to me
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
comradebillyboy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-22-05 06:39 PM
Response to Original message
20. you should pardon the expression but
he is a complete pussy. even more spineless than the average democrat
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kentuck Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-22-05 06:41 PM
Response to Original message
22. He's a decent person....
but a Democrat would be better for us and the nation....unfortunately he's a Republican.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jackpan1260 Donating Member (361 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-22-05 06:46 PM
Response to Original message
25. He isn't better than a single current dem senator or congressman. eom
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
QC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-22-05 07:03 PM
Response to Original message
32. He's a Republican and therefore part of the problem.
I used to be one of those "judge them individually" types, but since the GOP has become the single greatest threat to this nation, then any person who in any way supports the GOP is part of that threat.

That's why I think the so-called "moderate Republicans" do not deserve all the praise they get here. Are they better than, say, Santorum and Frist? Sure. But that's not saying much, is it?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Stinky The Clown Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-22-05 07:18 PM
Response to Original message
34. My opinion? His moldy ass is taking up a Democrat's seat.
Fuck moderate Republicans. We need Dems.

I'd take a Lieberman before a Chafee. And I am the last person who would be a fan of Holy Joementum.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AX10 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-22-05 07:49 PM
Response to Original message
36. Lincoln Chafee is wrongfully occupying a Democratic Senate Seat.
Yes, I'd vote for Lieberman over Chaffee, no question.
Defeat Lincoln Chafee next year.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DaveinMD Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-22-05 10:00 PM
Response to Original message
41. he's a Republican
that's all you need to know. He needs to be defeated.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
thatsrightimirish Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-22-05 10:01 PM
Response to Original message
42. Get Rid of Him!
A liberal only when he wants to be Chafee or an always liberal Sheldon Whitehouse? Hmmmmmmmmmm
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Blue_Tires Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-22-05 10:14 PM
Response to Original message
43. I've actually met him a couple of times professionally
Edited on Thu Dec-22-05 10:14 PM by Blue_Tires
during non photo-op, candid moments--there are a few plusses for him, since he has to serve such a liberal state:

1. He can't come out and say it directly, but he HATES W (wrote in Bush I in the 04 election)

2. His environmental record is unmatched while in the Environment and Public Works Committee, and he is greener than many 'green' dems

3. Despite being GOP, he ain't Zell or Joe-mentum
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
thatsrightimirish Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-22-05 10:18 PM
Response to Reply #43
44. Sorry but
I would much rather see Reid be the leader and not Frist and getting rid of Chafee is a huge step of accomplishing that. If he hated W that much he should have left the GOP.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SkiGuy Donating Member (451 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-22-05 10:25 PM
Response to Reply #44
46. Exactly
If he switches parties, I'll vote for him. He's done many good things for my state. But on a national level, I just can't trust him. He never answered 2 emails I sent asking if he would support an impeachment. If he does, I'll let you know if you're interested.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Blue_Tires Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-22-05 10:33 PM
Response to Reply #46
47. we'll see what happens
because he IS vulnerable, and has lived too long on his father's name

sadly, he still has some kind of romantic notion of a more moderate, socially liberal/fiscally conservative GOP, and he wants to remain loyal to that image...I do remember him saying publicly that he would switch if it made the dems the majority, or if the dems already became the majority, but so far that has not happened
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Chemical Bill Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-22-05 10:52 PM
Response to Reply #47
49. I don't remember hearing him say he'd switch.
I think it's long overdue.

Bill
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Chemical Bill Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-22-05 10:21 PM
Response to Original message
45. He has an R after his name. I hate that.
He may win again next year. The RNC is giving him money because Laffey will lose in November if he is the repug. Whitehouse was AG for RI, and the first thing he tried was to open all medical records to law enforcement. He didn't win that one, but I haven't liked him since. Matt Brown isn't too bad, but he is weak in the polling and fundraising. I think it will be Chafee vs Whitehouse, with Chafee favored unless something really big happens, bigger than impeachment of *. Chafee is old money, but his wife is old much more money. Oh, and Chafee was a blacksmith for a while, and has admitted to snorting coke. Where's cokemon?

Bill
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
obreaslan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-22-05 10:36 PM
Response to Original message
48. Lose the "R" and we'll talk. n/t.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Captain Hilts Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-22-05 10:53 PM
Response to Original message
50. My office worked on his last campaign.
Edited on Thu Dec-22-05 10:56 PM by MookieWilson
He's just not that interested in the job. His wife wanted him to run.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon Apr 29th 2024, 09:42 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC