Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Why is this rat bastard Roberts unchallenged on this bullshit?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
fooj Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-04-06 05:08 PM
Original message
Why is this rat bastard Roberts unchallenged on this bullshit?
Edited on Sat Feb-04-06 05:10 PM by fooj
http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20060204/ap_on_go_co/domestic_spying

WASHINGTON - Senate Intelligence Committee Chairman Pat Roberts said Friday the Bush administration's domestic spying is within the president's inherent power under the Constitution, and he rejected criticism that Congress was kept in the dark about it.

The program is "legal, necessary and reasonable," the Kansas Republican wrote in a 19-page letter, taking a particularly expansive view of the president's authority for the warrantless surveillance.
<snip>

It is NOT legal and he damn well knows it. Grrrrrrrrrrrr...

peace.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-04-06 05:11 PM
Response to Original message
1. Because people are confusing the issue
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mr_Spock Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-04-06 05:12 PM
Response to Original message
2. More hapless desperation by the RW fascist-leaning government
Edited on Sat Feb-04-06 05:13 PM by Mr_Spock
THIS is why you cannot ever have the same party in charge of Congress and the WH. Let's hope this mistake can be corrected quickly.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jillan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-04-06 05:15 PM
Response to Original message
3. The bushies have done such a good job
in confusing everybody.

Afterall, they are not spying on us, they are spying on Al Queda - hahaha.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemInDistress Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-04-06 05:17 PM
Response to Original message
4. old pat is part and parcel to the bush crime family...he's an enabler
allowing the crime family free reign to murder pillage and destroy our country..bet he's going to be a member of that exclusive club Carlyle...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Backlash Cometh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-04-06 05:33 PM
Response to Original message
5. I think knowing who he was spying on, will go a long way to convince
people. I don't think many Republican types know that it wasn't just muslim extremists.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spindrifter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-04-06 05:44 PM
Response to Original message
6. Bald assertions by Roberts do not
make the spying "legal, necessary and reasonable..." They simply keep him on Ch*ney's good side. Snarrl!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-04-06 05:45 PM
Response to Original message
7. great hearing!!--the chair opens with statement that he supports BushCo no
really a hearing in my book. all show!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fooj Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-04-06 06:13 PM
Response to Reply #7
9. Some oversight!
:mad:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Justice Is Comin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-04-06 06:04 PM
Response to Original message
8. It's like the old wagon train days
you send out a scout looking for Indians. When he don't come back.....:nuke:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jujiman Donating Member (80 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-04-06 06:15 PM
Response to Original message
10. Because Up Is Down & Everything's Changed Now?

:bounce: :nuke: :bounce: :nuke: :bounce: :nuke: :bounce: :nuke: :bounce:

:nuke: :bounce: :nuke: :bounce: :nuke: :bounce: :nuke: :bounce: :nuke:

:evilgrin: :evilgrin: :evilgrin: :evilgrin: :evilgrin: :evilgrin:

:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Canuckistanian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-04-06 06:50 PM
Response to Original message
11. And what exactly is HIS knowledge of the subject?
He certainly doesn't know his Constitution and the division of govermental powers.

So, you can take his advice as completely uninformed and totally partisan, as he has proven with all of his past statements.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat May 04th 2024, 02:03 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC