Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

MSNBC: US must release Spy Documents

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
LeftNYC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-16-06 03:08 PM
Original message
MSNBC: US must release Spy Documents
Darned activist judges...


http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/11389667/


A federal judge Thursday ordered the Justice Department to respond within 20 days to requests by a civil liberties group for documents about President Bush’s domestic eavesdropping program.

The ruling was a victory for the Electronic Privacy Information Center, which sued the department under the Freedom of Information Act in seeking the release of the documents.
U.S. District Judge Henry Kennedy ruled that the department must finish processing the group’s requests and produce or identify all records within 20 days.

“Given the great public and media attention that the government’s warrantless surveillance program has garnered and the recent hearings before the Senate Judiciary Committee, the public interest is particularly well served by the timely release of the requested documents,” he said.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Roland99 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-16-06 03:09 PM
Original message
Too late. Gonzo is declaring Executive CYA.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
burythehatchet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-16-06 03:09 PM
Response to Original message
1. The white house complying with a judge's ruling
is laughable.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LeftNYC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-16-06 03:10 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. "this is a matter of national security"
"we keep documents here so we wont have to fight them, errr, here?"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MadMaddie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-16-06 03:09 PM
Response to Original message
2. So is Alberto Gonzalez going to try to ...
rewrite the law or something.

What tactic are they going to take to not follow the rule of law?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LeftNYC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-16-06 03:11 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. Alberto doesnt believe in the law...
the prez does what the prez wants too. Your just a pee-on...remember?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MadMaddie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-16-06 03:16 PM
Response to Reply #4
6. That's right...
The Furher is all empowered, he is the king of the "Republic"

By the way did anyone catch that in * Speech? He called the USA the "Republic".
:wtf:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
adigal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-16-06 03:15 PM
Response to Original message
5. Over at freeperville, they are daring the admin to defy this judge
Good Lord, they don't even understand the Constitution and balance of powers! They say things like, well, here are some of their comments:

"Unconstitutional Order!

Agreed.

This judge should be prosecuted for sedition, IMO.
18 posted on 02/16/2006 11:29:55 AM PST by Pox

I think they should just skip all the charades and start blowing up buildings themselves instead of waiting for the terrorists to do it.

Really, why don't the dems start killing Americans and save themselves some time.

20 posted on 02/16/2006 11:30:13 AM PST by HOTTIEBOY (The more people I meet, the more I like my dog.)

National Security will trump this chump big time...

Just another arrogant twit in a black robe...

Does this judge have his own army?If so,let him enforce his ruling.If not,let the fool be ignored.(Yes,I know,and file an appeal)
24 posted on 02/16/2006 11:32:25 AM PST by smoothsailing
< Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies >
To: jveritas

HERE...is the reason that it has been so important for Bush to get as many SCOTUS justices confirmed as possible under his watch...

I have a feeling that these kind of "decisions" will be all too prevalent coming from some of Clinton's judges..

25 posted on 02/16/2006 11:33:22 AM PST by Txsleuth

Does this judge have his own army?

For once I agree with Joe Stalin... "Judge, how many divisions do you have?"
28 posted on 02/16/2006 11:34:35 AM PST by AmericaUnited "

So, the lunatics at free republic are calling for ignoring a judge's order, or fighting it with the army. These people are not Americans, they are fringe, right wing lunatics, citing STalin to support the Cult of Bush.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LeftNYC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-16-06 03:21 PM
Response to Reply #5
7. You deserve a purple, or at least a DU heart,
Edited on Thu Feb-16-06 03:22 PM by LeftNYC
for treading into that water...

Go take a shower...I can smell the freepiness from here.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OneBlueSky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-17-06 02:43 AM
Response to Original message
8. never happen . . . not with the BushCo Supreme Court as . . .
the final arbiter . . . this is what this nation has come to . . .
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 02nd 2024, 04:22 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC