|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
ProSense (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-22-06 07:16 AM Original message |
Does it bother anyone else that the IAVA PAC supports a Republican? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
acmejack (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-22-06 07:23 AM Response to Original message |
1. They can support whoever they wish! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FrenchieCat (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-22-06 12:24 PM Response to Reply #1 |
28. But they don't support the 1 Republican running..... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bandit (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-22-06 12:56 PM Response to Reply #1 |
38. There must be some shortage or the GOP would not have |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
acmejack (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-22-06 04:35 PM Response to Reply #38 |
50. Quite witty! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
OzarkDem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-22-06 07:32 AM Response to Original message |
2. PACs have to be non-partisan n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ProSense (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-22-06 07:41 AM Response to Reply #2 |
3. Yes, but most |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NoPasaran (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-22-06 07:45 AM Response to Reply #2 |
4. PACs don't have to be non-partisan |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
1932 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-22-06 10:03 AM Response to Reply #2 |
7. no they don't! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Jai4WKC08 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-22-06 01:09 PM Response to Reply #7 |
40. Depends how they're structured |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
1932 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-23-06 09:57 AM Response to Reply #40 |
51. i think you're confusing the tax-free status of charitable organizations |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Rowdyboy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-22-06 08:22 AM Response to Original message |
5. The man promises to "support traditional families"..... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Totally Committed (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-22-06 08:31 AM Response to Original message |
6. It bothers me a bit, yes... but, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
1932 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-22-06 10:08 AM Response to Reply #6 |
8. How do you square your theory about Joe with fact he was VP nominee? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Totally Committed (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-22-06 11:42 AM Response to Reply #8 |
16. He was the DLC choice... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
1932 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-23-06 10:03 AM Response to Reply #16 |
52. He was Gore's choice, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NativeTexan (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-22-06 10:11 AM Response to Original message |
9. They have served and lost buddies in Iraq AND the War on Terror.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ProSense (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-22-06 10:14 AM Response to Original message |
10. This is from the Band of Brothers site |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SteppingRazor (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-22-06 10:15 AM Response to Original message |
11. This is a veteran's group, not a Democratic group... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ProSense (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-22-06 10:22 AM Response to Reply #11 |
12. Noted. The impression was that it was a group supporting |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Adelante (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-22-06 12:04 PM Response to Reply #12 |
21. The group you mention here is ONLY supporting DEMOCRATS |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ProSense (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-22-06 12:11 PM Response to Reply #21 |
24. What are you talking about? The group in the OP is supporting Van Taylor |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ICantBelieve (312 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-22-06 12:42 PM Response to Reply #24 |
35. IAVAPAC IS NOT SUPPORTING VAN TAYLOR |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Jai4WKC08 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-22-06 12:50 PM Response to Reply #24 |
36. No, IAVA is NOT supporting Van Taylor |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Adelante (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-22-06 01:11 PM Response to Reply #24 |
41. Re your post #12 - correct |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Catchawave (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-22-06 10:31 AM Response to Original message |
13. I support their mission, but |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Fabio (929 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-22-06 10:39 AM Response to Original message |
14. Yes. I know Van Taylor. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Adelante (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-22-06 11:52 AM Response to Reply #14 |
18. Ask him if IAVA PAC is supporting him |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ICantBelieve (312 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-22-06 11:56 AM Response to Reply #18 |
19. Exactly... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
OzarkDem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-22-06 12:14 PM Response to Reply #18 |
25. How do you all know so much? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ICantBelieve (312 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-22-06 12:22 PM Response to Reply #25 |
27. Check the date on the linked story... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Adelante (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-22-06 01:23 PM Response to Reply #27 |
44. That poster (not the OP) does a smear job in every thread |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ICantBelieve (312 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-22-06 11:36 AM Response to Original message |
15. ATTENTION: THIS IS AN URBAN MYTH |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Adelante (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-22-06 11:50 AM Response to Original message |
17. Both links lead to an LA Times article |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sybil (203 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-22-06 12:03 PM Response to Original message |
20. .IAVAPAC endorsement criteria |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Donna Zen (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-22-06 12:06 PM Response to Original message |
22. From Taylor's website: |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ArkySue (647 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-22-06 12:07 PM Response to Original message |
23. Learn about IAVAPAC here: |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ProSense (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-22-06 12:19 PM Response to Original message |
26. Link on their site to news stories |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ICantBelieve (312 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-22-06 12:25 PM Response to Reply #26 |
29. IAVAPAC Not Supporting Taylor... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ProSense (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-22-06 12:27 PM Response to Reply #29 |
30. Thank you. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ICantBelieve (312 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-22-06 12:38 PM Response to Reply #30 |
34. I've fired off an email... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FrenchieCat (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-22-06 12:36 PM Response to Reply #29 |
33. What we don't want to is to "Hackett" this PAC |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Donna Zen (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-22-06 12:29 PM Response to Reply #26 |
31. Back to the original OP |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ProSense (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-22-06 12:33 PM Response to Reply #31 |
32. Back to their web site: Remove the misleading links. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tom Rinaldo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-22-06 12:56 PM Response to Reply #32 |
37. How can you in good conscience call for removing misleading links? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ProSense (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-22-06 01:11 PM Response to Reply #37 |
42. The OP isn't misleading, it's based on the information currently |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Jai4WKC08 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-22-06 01:06 PM Response to Reply #32 |
39. But the article isn't misleading |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ProSense (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-22-06 01:19 PM Response to Reply #39 |
43. OK. I will request that this thread be deleted. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Adelante (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-22-06 01:24 PM Response to Reply #43 |
45. Thank you, ProSense |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CarolNYC (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-22-06 01:31 PM Response to Reply #39 |
46. Yeah, I don't see where in the article.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ICantBelieve (312 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-22-06 01:38 PM Response to Reply #46 |
48. That article doesn't |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FrenchieCat (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-22-06 01:33 PM Response to Reply #39 |
47. Nope..... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sybil (203 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-22-06 02:59 PM Response to Reply #31 |
49. Yep Z! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Thu May 02nd 2024, 03:47 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC