News AnalysisBig Problem, Dubai Deal or Not WASHINGTON, Feb. 22 —
-snip-
"The management of these ports is the door which you walk through to get to all of these other questions," said Senator John Kerry, Democrat of Massachusetts, who, like Mr. Bush, used cargo ports as the backdrop for some of his speeches about the post-Sept. 11 world in 2004.
"It raises a lot of questions about the lobbying, the connections and the terms of the deal, and the security problems the administration has left unaddressed." It is also convenient for the Democrats, who are able to sound more hawkish on domestic security than President Bush. Mr. Bush finds himself burdened with the more nuanced argument that turning down this deal would send a message to the entire Arab world that it is not to be trusted, no matter how friendly individual countries may have been.
The administration's core problem at the ports, most experts agree, is how long it has taken for the federal government to set and enforce new security standards — and to provide the technology to look inside millions of containers that flow through them. Only 4 percent or 5 percent of those containers are inspected. There is virtually no standard for how containers are sealed, or for certifying the identities of thousands of drivers who enter and leave the ports to pick them up. If a nuclear weapon is put inside a container — the real fear here — "it will probably happen when some truck driver is paid off to take a long lunch, before he even gets near a terminal," said Mr. Flynn.
http://www.nytimes.com/2006/02/23/politics/23assess.html?hp&ex=1140670800&en=6d1ee61ea35c53a7&ei=5094&partner=homepage