rsmith6621
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Mar-02-06 11:57 AM
Original message |
Stephanie Miller.....Impeachable...Bush and Katrina. |
|
Edited on Thu Mar-02-06 11:58 AM by rsmith6621
This Morning she said....Criminal Neglect she calls it.............
|
MadMaddie
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Mar-02-06 11:59 AM
Response to Original message |
|
Criminal Neglect.....I think that exactly what the * cabal did...
|
SteppingRazor
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Mar-02-06 12:05 PM
Response to Original message |
2. Not by any legal definition... |
|
criminal neglect presupposes direct responsibility (e.g. parental neglect). To prove criminal neglect in court, one would have to prove that Bush was directly responsible for the lives of everyone in New Orleans, something that
a) would be impossible to prove, I think and;
b) would set a terrible precedent even if it were proved.
|
The Backlash Cometh
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Mar-02-06 12:16 PM
Response to Reply #2 |
|
He came on t.v. and lied to 300,000,000 people on a matter that involved the deaths of a great number of people.
|
SteppingRazor
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Mar-02-06 01:54 PM
Response to Reply #3 |
|
The GOP response will be that that isn't a crime. He wasn't under oath when he lied.
|
0007
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Mar-02-06 01:01 PM
Response to Original message |
4. The proof is in the pudding. |
|
junior must be held accountable. No doubt about it!
|
gulliver
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Mar-02-06 01:13 PM
Response to Original message |
5. Read Ann Coulter's "High Crimes and Misdemeanors" ... |
|
... only substitute Bush's name for Clinton's. She is quite clear that law-breaking is not necessary for impeachment. Merely lying to the country or choosing poor officials (among other things) is. I wonder if she will write another book for Bush.
(Don't buy the book. Check it out at the library.)
|
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Sun May 05th 2024, 12:50 AM
Response to Original message |