Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Missouri Lege wants to make "Christianity" the majority religion

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
NoFederales Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-03-06 12:43 PM
Original message
Missouri Lege wants to make "Christianity" the majority religion
Edited on Fri Mar-03-06 12:44 PM by NoFederales
<Missouri bill to name :Christianity the state's official "majority" religion.>

<Missouri:>

Missouri legislators in Jefferson City considered a bill that would name Christianity the state's official "majority" religion.

House Concurrent Resolution 13 has is pending in the state legislature.

...

The resolution would recognize "a Christian god," and it would not protect minority religions, but "protect the majority's right to express their religious beliefs.


The resolution also recognizes that, "a greater power exists," and only Christianity receives what the resolution calls, "justified recognition."

This is what Missouri has to offer its citizens? How many goddamned real problems are out there—and we get this shit?

NoFederales
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
sui generis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-03-06 12:44 PM
Response to Original message
1. That's fine until Islam is the majority religion
then what's he gonna do? In Allah We Trust, you know.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mythsaje Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-03-06 12:44 PM
Response to Original message
2. Can we throw them out of the Union for crap like this?
Please?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Initech Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-03-06 12:44 PM
Response to Original message
3. The first amendment needs to be permanently tattooed to their foreheads
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OzarkDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-03-06 12:45 PM
Response to Original message
4. Rallying their base
Looks like they're working hard to turn out the religio wacko voters.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
valerief Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-03-06 12:46 PM
Response to Original message
5. States have majority religions?
Edited on Fri Mar-03-06 12:46 PM by valerief
What in heavens for?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
realisticphish Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-03-06 12:47 PM
Response to Original message
6. Jesus Christ
(no pun intended)
why the fuck do my fellow christians need this? I don't feel threatened by other beliefs, and I DEFINATELY don't need to opress other religions to make myself feel right.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
izzybeans Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-03-06 12:49 PM
Response to Original message
7. Makes sense because John Ashcroft believes Missouri is the
Edited on Fri Mar-03-06 12:53 PM by izzybeans
historical site of the Garden of Eden. It's the birthplace of the universe...Missouri. :sarcasm:

Oh and on edit " Let the Eagle soar like she's never soared before. Let the Eagle soar. Yeah <jazz hands>"

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BurgherHoldtheLies Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-03-06 12:52 PM
Response to Original message
8. Since majority rules, and all that...
Pssst, fundies, hope you enjoy your Catholic endocrination...

The largest denomination in the US:

Catholic
# of = 71,796,719
% of US pop = 24.5%
% growth = +11%

http://www.adherents.com/rel_USA.html#families
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Deja Q Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-03-06 12:53 PM
Response to Original message
9. Anyone can say "I am a Christian".
How they define what a Christian does is the issue.

And they'd better have their ducks lined up big-time.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RubyDuby in GA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-03-06 12:54 PM
Response to Original message
10. And here I was thinking that Georgia had a lock on assholes:
The Republican controlled legislature, in last year's term, already tackled that oh so tough part and made sweet tea the official drink of the state. I really didn't think they could follow it up, but they're always out to prove me wrong:


Red Clay Would Be Official State Dirt Under Lawmaker's Bill: Rep. Bobby Franklin, R-Marietta, has introduced a bill designating Georgia red clay as the official state dirt.
It is HB 1443.

Franklin said it was prompted by criticism he got from a constituent for his recent vote against the bill designating the Southern Appalachian brook trout the official state cold water fish. “It got me to thinking these things are important to some people,” he said. Franklin, who was raised in Alabama and had heard about Georgia red clay all his life, said he got to thinking what still hadn’t been designated an official state symbol and hit upon the dirt idea.

“It’s definitely not a joke,” he said. Unfortunately, the same cannot be said about Franklin's service to his constituents.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ayeshahaqqiqa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-03-06 01:10 PM
Response to Reply #10
15. I wish the MO legislature had spent its time on this
it would be time better spent, I think.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sabbat hunter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-03-06 12:59 PM
Response to Original message
11. unconstitutional
establishes a state religion. lets see if the SCOTUS does the right thing and over turns it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sabbat hunter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-03-06 01:01 PM
Response to Original message
12. link
Edited on Fri Mar-03-06 01:05 PM by sabbat hunter
do you have a link so i can post this elsewhere.
i went to the missouri legislature site and there is no sign of that bill/resolution.


thanks
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NoFederales Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-03-06 07:19 PM
Response to Reply #12
23. Unable to edit--time expired or some such--just got home and find that
my link didn't take; used the wrong symbols.

NoFederales
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TechBear_Seattle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-03-06 01:04 PM
Response to Original message
13. Not a bill but a resolution. Link to text here
From the website of the Missouri State House:
http://www.house.mo.gov/bills061/biltxt/intro/HCR0013I.htm

This is perfectly constitutional, which makes the move even more repugnant, as it sets official policy in how laws will be crafted, implemented, enforced and interpreted.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ayeshahaqqiqa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-03-06 01:13 PM
Response to Reply #13
16. But any law enacted
that discriminates either in favor of Christianity or against another faith will be tested before the SCOTUS, won't it?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TechBear_Seattle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-03-06 01:20 PM
Response to Reply #16
18. Yes, but
Again, this is not a law, it is a resolution. And any law crafted with this in mind will still not be allowed to cross any constitutional boundaries. But once state courts start interpreting laws through the resolution, and once new laws are crafted, implemented and enforced in light of the resolution, those boundaries will start to drift. And not in a direction favorable to atheists, Wiccans, Jews, Muslims, etc.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ayeshahaqqiqa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-03-06 01:08 PM
Response to Original message
14. La illaha il Allah
there is no God but God

That means there is only one God

No "Christian God" different from a "Jewish God" from a "Hindu God" from a "Pagan Gods/Goddesses", etc. etc.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
acmavm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-03-06 07:29 PM
Response to Reply #14
26. Yes. None of us have spoken to him/her/it personally. No one knows
what or who God really is.

And then, people who don't believe, will they be forced to attend church or be discriminated against? That worries me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sabbat hunter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-03-06 01:16 PM
Response to Original message
17. your interpretation
is a little deceptive.



here is the actual wording

SECOND REGULAR SESSION

House Concurrent Resolution No. 13



Whereas, our forefathers of this great nation of the United States recognized a Christian God and used the principles afforded to us by Him as the founding principles of our nation; and

Whereas, as citizens of this great nation, we the majority also wish to exercise our constitutional right to acknowledge our Creator and give thanks for the many gifts provided by Him; and

Whereas, as elected officials we should protect the majority's right to express their religious beliefs while showing respect for those who object; and

Whereas, we wish to continue the wisdom imparted in the Constitution of the United States of America by the founding fathers; and

Whereas, we as elected officials recognize that a Greater Power exists above and beyond the institutions of mankind:

Now, therefore, be it resolved by the members of the House of Representatives of the Ninety-third General Assembly, Second Regular Session, the Senate concurring therein, that we stand with the majority of our constituents and exercise the common sense that voluntary prayer in public schools and religious displays on public property are not a coalition of church and state, but rather the justified recognition of the positive role that Christianity has played in this great nation of ours, the United States of America.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Orrex Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-03-06 01:23 PM
Response to Reply #17
19. Still an explicit endorsement of religion
And our founding fathers also believed that bloodletting was an effective treatment for balancing our unhealthy humors. Let's make that a pillar of the AMA, while we're at it.

I know that not all Christians are fundamentalist crazies, but I have seldom heard a non-Liberal Christian rise up to condemn such an offensive, misbegotten, and, frankly, blasphemous over-reaching of political power by a nominal Conservative.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sabbat hunter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-03-06 02:53 PM
Response to Reply #19
21. oh definately
it is unconstitutional in my opinion.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Orrex Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-03-06 03:08 PM
Response to Reply #21
22. Hey, don't be like that!
I was trying to pick a fight, and there you go agreeing with me!
:mad:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Radio_Guy Donating Member (875 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-03-06 02:35 PM
Response to Original message
20. Good grief
If that happened in Alabama, I'd organize a march on Goat Hill protesting that garbage.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NoFederales Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-03-06 07:20 PM
Response to Reply #20
25. Our goat heads are much stickier--painful, too
NoFederales
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
thefool_wa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-03-06 07:20 PM
Response to Original message
24. I'm sure someone has said this already
But this is just plain unconstitutional. If the federal government can't do it, neither can the states.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Blue_Tires Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-03-06 09:23 PM
Response to Original message
27. how long before
they make 'white' the 'official majority race?'
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon Apr 29th 2024, 03:03 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC