adarling
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Apr-07-06 06:23 PM
Original message |
|
chris is gettin alittle heated with ginsberg. Pretty interesting, except they are trying to spin it so that they are not guilty of blatently lying haha. thisis ridiculous.
|
ewagner
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Apr-07-06 06:25 PM
Response to Original message |
1. against my better judgement |
|
I just turned it on....
got the puking bucket by the Laz-E-Boy....all set.....
|
adarling
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Apr-07-06 06:26 PM
Response to Reply #1 |
ewagner
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Apr-07-06 06:31 PM
Response to Reply #2 |
3. Isikoff trying to give cover? |
|
said this leak is nothing compared to the lu-lus in Woodward's book
|
oasis
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Apr-07-06 06:39 PM
Response to Reply #3 |
6. He said much the same on another talking head show. He's a White House |
|
Edited on Fri Apr-07-06 06:39 PM by oasis
shill. "Bush" White House, that is. The days of his "investigative journalism" ended when Clinton left office.
|
oasis
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Apr-07-06 06:36 PM
Response to Original message |
4. Newsweek's Michael Isikoff is a WH shill. He says leak is "small potatoes. |
|
:eyes: Rove got him out early on the leak story with the theme "play down the importance ".
|
Neil Lisst
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Apr-07-06 06:38 PM
Response to Original message |
5. Ginsberg has no soul, and even for politicos, that's unusual |
|
He could watch Bush lop off heads with a sword, and he'd calmly explain why it was necessary AND legal.
|
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Tue May 07th 2024, 06:52 PM
Response to Original message |