rucky
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu May-11-06 10:21 PM
Original message |
Poll question: Which Group Of Voters Could We LEAST Afford To Lose? |
Journeyman
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu May-11-06 10:24 PM
Response to Original message |
EllieGreen
(116 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu May-11-06 10:31 PM
Response to Reply #1 |
5. *Chuckle* Good one. n/t |
rucky
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu May-11-06 10:33 PM
Response to Reply #1 |
LostInAnomie
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu May-11-06 10:26 PM
Response to Original message |
|
They are a group that our party has taken for granted for too long. We've done little to actually deserve their vote and yet they are some of our most ardent supporters.
|
EllieGreen
(116 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu May-11-06 10:30 PM
Response to Original message |
|
Right now is prime time to grab the vote, especially because Latino's will be the largest minority in the United States.
Bush & Co. have already pissed a lot of my family and friends off (Latino), and they will be voting Democrat in the upcoming election. I hope the powers-that-be in this party realize what a golden opportunity this is.
|
Staph
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu May-11-06 10:31 PM
Response to Original message |
|
Edited on Thu May-11-06 10:31 PM by Staph
Remember us? 51% of the country?
|
rucky
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu May-11-06 10:34 PM
Response to Reply #4 |
|
but I vaguely remember women.
|
EllieGreen
(116 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu May-11-06 10:35 PM
Response to Reply #4 |
9. Well, according to SOME Dems.... |
|
...."women's issues" need to be put on the back burner to make sure that Dems win the next election. Ya know, try to get some of those "soft-Republicans" over to our side without appearing to be "radical" (as in, protecting the right to choose, etc.).
Besides (and I am being VERY sarcastic here), who else would we vote for? According to this guy I know, the Dems don't have to work hard for women's votes anymore, because the Repukes are so hard-core. To which I replied, "Oh really? What would happen if a fraction of women voters move over to the Green Party? (Hello! 2000! Nice to see you again!).
I'm rambling on now so I'll shut up. :silly:
|
TankLV
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu May-11-06 11:58 PM
Response to Reply #9 |
15. Not to mention all those "silly gays" and their "marriage" thingy! |
TankLV
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu May-11-06 11:58 PM
Response to Reply #4 |
14. Hey - just stay home and have your babies and clean the damn trailer! |
|
Oh, sorry, you were sayin somethin?!
On a more serious note, I couldn't agree more - way to "forget" over 50% of us - or take for granted - as usual!
|
IndianaGreen
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu May-11-06 10:31 PM
Response to Original message |
|
Woe to the party if we end up with a prowar nominee, or one that is sympathetic to fundie views on abortion and LGBT rights.
Considering the close marging of the last Presidential cycles, we don't have the luxury of doing to our base what even the GOP won't do to theirs: betrayal!
|
longship
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu May-11-06 10:46 PM
Response to Original message |
|
Plenty of room in the Democratic tent.
|
rucky
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu May-11-06 11:24 PM
Response to Reply #10 |
12. Joe Lieberman thanks you! |
|
he's sitting at the party, alone in the corner, next to the snack tray.
|
Kablooie
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu May-11-06 10:56 PM
Response to Original message |
TankLV
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu May-11-06 11:56 PM
Response to Original message |
13. Everybody but the facsist evangeicals and "anti-abortionists" mafia. |
|
Pro Choice IS the "middle road"!
ALL the christo fascists can go fuck themselves.
We don't need or WANT them!
|
FrenchieCat
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri May-12-06 12:09 AM
Response to Original message |
16. Shit, you're talking about "losing" some voters for the Dems? |
|
Hell, thought we needed MORE voters.......shouldn't we be talking about that instead?
|
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Wed May 01st 2024, 02:28 AM
Response to Original message |