Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

DNC To Release Statement on Election Protection Today

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Kevin Spidel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-13-06 10:15 AM
Original message
DNC To Release Statement on Election Protection Today
Stay tuned. I will be getting the first copy before it get's out. Made reference to it here: http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_mesg&forum=132&topic_id=2720994&mesg_id=2721022

I will post as soon as I get it!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
AndyA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-13-06 10:22 AM
Response to Original message
1. Thanks for the heads up - I've got this thread bookmarked.
Any idea of the time frame for release? Thanks again.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kevin Spidel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-13-06 10:25 AM
Response to Reply #1
3. we feel mid day. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
robinlynne Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-13-06 10:23 AM
Response to Original message
2. can't wait! hope it's good. got my fingers crossed!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mom cat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-13-06 10:27 AM
Response to Original message
4. I want to see a real plan with a firm committment to root out fraud. If
not, the Demos are dead no matter how bad the Bushies get.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rose Siding Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-13-06 10:48 AM
Response to Reply #4
7. They have made that committment-
In June-

Governor Dean spoke this afternoon at the Voting Rights Summit. He opened by talking about the Democratic Party’s efforts, here in Washington, and in the states, to fight legislation that would require voters to produce photo IDs in order to vote, specifically mentioning the Indiana Democratic Party’s challenge to their state’s new photo identification law. He said the laws are aimed at “voter suppression” and are not about protecting Democracy or preventing fraud.

The Governor then went on to talk about voting machines saying, “We are also going to talk about the machines. I don’t think these machines work. If they do work, the public has no way to verify that they work, and I don’t understand why people in Washington aren’t more concerned. I believe that these things can not be relied on and we do need to spend time and energy on this.”

Governor Dean also praised the efforts of the National Democratic Lawyers Council and the work that they have done. The Lawyers Council is a national organization which is working to recruit local attorneys who can assist in election protection efforts – one example the Governor gave, “During the Virginia elections in 2005 we had an irregularity (with a voting machine) and we were able to get to the clerks who were running the election and fix the problem on the spot. We have that capability and it matters.”

Yet he cautioned that it isn’t just technical problems that Democrats have to be wary of, but old hat tactics that hope to intimidate voters at the polls, or challenge an individual's right to vote. He gave the example of Dartmouth College students in New Hampshire who were denied their right to vote by a single town clerk who decided registering with their college addresses was unacceptable and who were then challenged by poll watchers on Election Day, infringing on the voting process. “Often it is race based,” he said, “but we know there are two groups that are challenged more often than others – African Americans and people under 45 – all people under 45.”

Governor Dean closed his remarks by saying, “This is a really huge issue, because it’s not about the future of the Democratic Party, but the future of a Democracy that has been the greatest Democracy for 200 years. When you begin to believe winning is more important than America, you have hurt your country, and we can’t have that – we want to make sure that America is always first.”

http://www.democrats.org/a/2006/06/governor_dean_a_3.php


And in May-

DNC Chairman Howard Dean Denounces Harmful Republican Voter ID Law in Missouri
http://www.democrats.org/a/2006/05/dnc_chairman_ho_25.php

Governor Dean on Voting Rights
snip>
We are expanding the work of the Voting Rights Institute to promote efforts aimed at protecting the right of every American to cast their ballot and have their ballot counted.

We formed the National Lawyers Council to fight systematic barriers to registration and voting across the country, and through the NLC we are providing legal assistance to the Indiana Democratic Party's appeal of a federal court ruling upholding that state's radical voter ID law.

The Voting Rights Institute established a toll free number to help displaced New Orleans residents vote in the April 22 primaries and to collect information about Indiana voters who were disenfranchised by the voter ID law.

I know you have done important work here in New York through the NY Democratic Lawyers Council.

You did important work in monitoring the 2005 mayoral race in New York City and local races in Nassau, Suffolk, Westchester, Rockland and Ulster Counties.

You dispatched a team of lawyers to conduct election monitoring for New Orleans mayoral primary and other local races.

You worked on the Board of Elections regulations for voting machines, and you have been working with the New York State Democratic Senate Campaign Committee and the DCCC to work on election monitoring in key races 2006 so we can take back Congress and take back the NY Senate......

http://www.democrats.org/a/2006/05/governor_dean_o_17.php


And more-

Democracy At Risk: The 2004 Election in Ohio

After the 2004 election, there were widespread reports of serious voting problems in Ohio. The Democratic National Committee's Voting Rights Institute made a commitment to investigate these reports and ascertain exactly what happened on November 2 in Ohio.

An exhaustive five-month investigation by the VRI's research and investigative team identified grave problems in the administration of Ohio's voting system. More than 1 in 4 voters in Ohio faced problems at the polls, including illegal requests for identification, long lines, poorly trained election officials, and more. There were also dramatic disparities in voting conditions among different races; African Americans waited nearly three times as long on average as whites to vote.

Most important, the VRI's comprehensive investigation resulted in concrete recommendations that will help protect every American's right to vote and to have that vote counted. These recommendations cover voting equipment, training for poll workers, uniform standards, and much more.

Get the facts about exactly what happened in Ohio in 2004, and learn how Democrats are fighting to protect our rights.

Download the Report
The full report (12MB download)

http://www.democrats.org/a/2005/06/democracy_at_ri.php


As for the plan, you can see several avenues are being pursued. Without power at the federal level, statute, regulatory, and office holder changes have to be local for now. That's one of the reasons that support for the 50 state strategy is so critical.

To help support that strategy, (for anyone who's able) Democracy bonds are available here-

http://www.democrats.org/democracybonds.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AndyA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-13-06 10:28 AM
Response to Original message
5. Kicked and recommended! n/m
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
drm604 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-13-06 10:33 AM
Response to Original message
6. K&R
:kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kevin Spidel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-13-06 11:18 AM
Response to Original message
8. UPDATE on this statement...
It appears it is going thru the final eyes and should get a draft within the hour.. I hope. But if it is past this hour, i will be on the road headed to DemFest... if i get it while I am on the road I will have to post via blackerry. The only way to do that is my personal blog at www.spidel.net. So please keep an eye there and can someone cross post the statement from there to here. Thanks!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hootinholler Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-13-06 11:50 AM
Response to Reply #8
11. Here's hoping it's motivational to all candidates to fight
Election smells.

Thanks Kevin.

-Hoot
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MaineDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-13-06 11:33 AM
Response to Original message
9. This is going to be a major discussion at the DNC meeeting in Chicago
The Party Chairs and Vice Chairs will be meeting with the DNC Voting Rights group.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mopinko Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-13-06 11:40 AM
Response to Original message
10. they are seriously waking up
i bumped into jan schakowsky at the grocery store the other day. she gave a speech last month admitting that she agrees with rfk jr. she told me that she was meeting with dean this week, and that they really understood that they had to do something. that nov 8 was TOO LATE.
watching this thread.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Vincardog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-13-06 01:28 PM
Response to Reply #10
12. IT is about damn time too. Still bettter late than Nov 8
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IndyOp Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-13-06 01:40 PM
Response to Reply #10
13. mopinko - thanks for sharing this.
I am waiting with bated breath to see this DNC report...

I am pleased to hear there will be A report, but am prepared to be disappointed about its content.

We'll see... :eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mopinko Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-13-06 01:51 PM
Response to Reply #13
14. i didn't want to share it until
the news of the report came out. i want her to talk to me the next time i bump into her!
but it was an interesting conversation. she also mentioned mexico, and we agreed that the same people were pulling the same shit.
she has a lot less to apologize for than most dems, since she was one of the ones that objected to the ohio electors. but she said that she had felt that we needed to "get past it", and now is sorry. and knows that something MUST be done.
she is a truly decent person, and i am proud to have her representing me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kevin Spidel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-13-06 02:57 PM
Response to Original message
15. a delay in the release...
"running it up the pole" at the DNC is taking some time. Our allies in the DNC of course are frustrated, but need our support. There are many in the DNC with us. But bureaucracy is dragging this out. I have a good friend waiting to post this once i get it. it could be tomorrow they are saying however. I am headed out the door to drive to San Diego. keep checking www.spidel.net if i get the first draft.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IndyOp Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-13-06 03:45 PM
Response to Reply #15
16. Thanks for the update Kevin! Waits are frustrating, but
advance warning is exciting...

:bounce:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kevin Spidel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-14-06 09:23 AM
Response to Original message
17. I HAVE THE STATEMENT
But have been asked to embargo it until last set of lawyer eyes from DNC looks at it. I can say this... this statment is soely on Busby/Bilbray Election in San Diego and the issues around that election
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
welshTerrier2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-14-06 09:48 AM
Response to Reply #17
18. will the DNC challenge the Busby race?
3 questions ...

will the DNC statement:
a. focus only on the Busby race
b. focus primarily on the electoral process looking AHEAD
c. support the RFK Jr. study alleging that both the Gore and Kerry elections were STOLEN?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mopinko Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-14-06 11:27 AM
Response to Reply #17
19. if they crack open ca 50, they crack it all
it's all there. one incontrovertible example is all we really need. i would be fine with a microscopic examination.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kevin Spidel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-14-06 02:22 PM
Response to Original message
20. HERE IT IS!!!! Keep this sucker kicked for all to read!
"Progressive Democrats of America (PDA) is thrilled that the DNC has joined PDA in calling for a swift and verifiable "manual count" of all 150,000 ballots cast in California's 50th District's "bellwether" June 6th special election. The age of computer voting is upon us, largely untested, and breached security regulations in San Diego cast the machines' certification into doubt. It also cast the results into question. Verifying the machine count by hand-counting ballots and paper trail is a necessary step in engaging the electorate’s trust so that they will engage in the democratic process, come November, that creates our free republic," stated Mimi Kennedy Board Chair of PDA.

For several weeks since the June 6th Special Election in California’s 50th Congressional District there have been reports of election irregularities. The DNC Voting Rights Institute (“VRI”) has been monitoring the developments since Election Day and has raised a number of concerns regarding new and disturbing information.

First and foremost is the fact that any election where there are allegations of machine tampering, break downs in chain of custody, security breaches and other such irregularities must be taken seriously. There are several facts in this race that raise very deep concerns.

On the facts:

1. We know for a fact that San Diego County election officials have admitted that a number of the voting machines were taken home in violation of the federal security regulations and guidelines and that a number of the machines showed evidence of tampering (broken seals, which should also have immediately disqualified those machines from use according to state laws implemented in just the last several months in response to new severe vulnerabilities discovered Diebold's optical-scan and touch-screen voting systems.)

2. We know that under state and federal guidelines, any such breach of security seals or the new "secure storage" requirements for these machines and their memory cards should have immediately disqualified those machines from use in the election for the reason that they became effectively decertified for use upon such security and chain of custody violations.

3. We also know that both the Diebold optical-scan and touch-screen (DRE) machines have been proven to be vulnerable to tampering in test after test by industry experts, including a team of computer scientists and security experts convened by California's Secretary of State in response to recent revelations concerning the hack ability of Diebold voting systems.

4. We know that serious security issues and efforts by Diebold to obfuscate problems with their hardware and software led California’s former Democratic Secretary of State to decertify Diebold touch-screen systems in 2004, only to have the Republican Secretary who succeeded him reinstitute the machines over the objections of scores of computer scientists and experts and hundreds of election integrity advocates.
The San Diego County election official responsible for administrating post-election manual vote counts has given three different arbitrary cost estimates for conducting the hand count. The quoted fees are as much as six times the costs estimates for similar hand counts in surrounding counties. The estimates portray the expense of a manual vote count to be cost prohibitive.

This is no longer about whether or not Busby or Bilbray won the election on June 6th. This is about the importance of verifying the facts related to election and voting machine irregularities in this race and the need to ensure an accurate count of all votes cast in this election so that the electorate may have confidence in the announced results in future elections.

The VRI will continue to monitor facts as they become available and will call for a swift and verifiable “manual count” of all 150,000 ballots cast in California’s 50th District’s "bellwether" June 6th special election in order to ensure the integrity of November 7th general elections and the overall integrity of our country’s voting systems in this still-untested age of computerized voting.

Greg Moore is director of the DNC's Voting Rights Institute and a PDA Board Member.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
drm604 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-14-06 05:26 PM
Response to Reply #20
22. That's it?
Am I the only one who's disappointed by this? The Busby/Bilbray race is important in the fight for free and verifiable elections and I'm glad that they're supporting a recount, but I was expecting a more general statement and a PLAN for November.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zhade Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-14-06 02:33 PM
Response to Original message
21. Kick
KICK

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RUMMYisFROSTED Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-14-06 05:36 PM
Response to Original message
23. Maybe the third person Mexico perspective opened some eyes.
:shrug: No se!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun May 05th 2024, 03:31 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC