Subpoenas for the New York Times Nothing for 9/11 Terrorists

[erpowers]

A few nights ago a conservative radio host went on I think it was the Chris Matthews Show. During her time on the show she said that the New York Times should be subpoenaed and charged with treason. I realize that she was just spouting the right wing talking points. However, I think her comments and the fact that the right wing is doing this shows their lack of priorities. The Attorney General should rush to send out subpoenas for the staff of the New York Times, but he should do nothing about those members of Al Quada. No, I am not talking about torturing members of Al Quada. I just do not think Republicans have been as eager to get real members of Al Quada. Why are they not upset that the main leader of Al Quada seem to still be at large? I just tend to think the New York Times issue is foolish and more should be done about terrorists.

[rfranklin]

1. It is an election year distraction...

They do not want to catch Osama bin Laden because Americans might interpret that as "mission Accomplished."

[libhill]

2. Osama Bin Laden,

"the gift that keeps on giving", as antoher poster once commented. Drag him out before every election, to remind us that only Bush and the Repukes can protect us from them A-rab booger men. Too bad he's still running free after all this war on terror hooplah...

[leesa]

3. That's because the 9-11 terrorists are in the White House.