Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Clinton to help Lieberman against rival

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Ringo84 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-20-06 05:50 PM
Original message
Clinton to help Lieberman against rival
Edited on Thu Jul-20-06 05:57 PM by Ringo84
This story was on Yahoo news. I noticed it when I checked my E-mail. You can find it at http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20060720/ap_on_el_se/connecticut_senate

Is Clinton really going to help that DINO? He doesn't deserve any help. He deserves to be outed from his seat and to defect to the Republicans.
Ringo
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Master Mahon Donating Member (621 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-20-06 05:53 PM
Response to Original message
1. This is pretty sad
it's been looking like the 'Big Dog' has been going the way of 'Old Yeller' lately.
Yet if his help is as effective as it was for Kerry and Gore, then let it be!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ringo84 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-20-06 05:56 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. It's pretty disgraceful
Why good ol' Bill would help a DINO like Lieberman is beyond my understanding. Are Democrats so concerned about winning votes that they'll sop to RWers like this? What a disappointment.
Ringo
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EndElectoral Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-20-06 05:53 PM
Response to Original message
2. Inexcusable!! Why? Worried, he has been barbecuing with Bush's too much!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
xultar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-20-06 05:56 PM
Response to Original message
4. Clinton to help Lieberman after Lieberman played the morals
card in 2000 puhleez. I'd dump joementum and make him fuckin BEG.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PATRICK Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-20-06 06:02 PM
Response to Original message
5. Joe jumps the gun- again
I have never seen desperation quite like this. You are supposed to WAIT for the actual endorsement. You are supposed to HINT that something might be coming. This is impolitic to say the least and appears to be forcing Bill's hand. This is the pattern of his other idiotic gun-jumping announcements like running as an independent- putting all his dem friends on the spot.

Joe is out of control and more importantly, so is his campaign. However, because he is not Dean or McCain but a "respectable" institutional favorite, the news is even less inclined to see or state the obvious.

Palpable desperation. Rushed mistakes. Notice how the pressure is put on his latest life preserver, Bill vs. Hillary. That's what I call leadership- Joe-style.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lefty-Taylor Donating Member (310 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-20-06 06:15 PM
Response to Reply #5
7. This simply confirms what many of us believed all along; namely,
that Clinton is the right-leaning Dem we always knew he was. Policy proof? The awful Telecomm Act of 96 and the more horrible "Welform Reform" Act. Not to mention his bombing of Iraqi civilians in 1993 because of a rumor of a plot to kill Bush senior. True progressives can only hope that Ms. Clinton will not be the Dem nominee in 08.

Go Lamont!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PATRICK Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-20-06 06:51 PM
Response to Reply #7
10. Joe unfortunately
just made this about Clinton. That is not an endorsement but a crutch- or a big bodyguard to hide behind.

I never judge people by their endorsements unless they are really treacherous or crazy. Biull's record is not that impressive on bailing out losers, but he is loyal enough not to care about getting beat up in a lost cause. You can respect that, but he hasn't even given the ringing endorsement yet! Has he?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ringo84 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-20-06 09:42 PM
Response to Reply #7
17. Lefty-Taylor
I don't think so. Clinton is pretty liberal. He has to be, considering how much the RWers hate him.

At the same time, I don't know what Clinton's thinking trying to help Lieberman.
Ringo
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
progdonkey Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-20-06 06:14 PM
Response to Original message
6. maybe Clinton is giving him the Kiss of Death...
Just playing Devil's Advocate here for a second:

If Clinton endorsed Lamont, that would just make Lieberman even more of a darling with the Republican crowd. "Save Joe! His opponent is a puppet of the Clenis!!" Or, if/when Lamont then won the primary, Clinton's endorsement would help get out the votes for whomever the Republican candidate is.

By endorsing Lieberman, Clinton is not only making it harder for Lieberman to appear to be standing up against the Loony Left (remember, even though we all know Clinton was a centrist on most things, the Dittoheads think he's a socialist) should he win the primary, but if/when he loses the primary and bolts the Party, it'll be harder for him to gain Republican votes, which would be his only hope in a three-way race.

Clinton's endorsement is basically saying, "If you lose the primary and bolt the Party, you're fucked. My endorsement now won't matter to Democrat voters when Lamont's the Democratic candidate, but it will be an albatross around your neck with Republican voters."

:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lefty-Taylor Donating Member (310 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-20-06 06:17 PM
Response to Reply #6
8. Well ProgDonkey, I like your creative logic. But with all due respects ...
I think you're reaching here.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
I_Make_Mistakes Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-20-06 06:22 PM
Response to Reply #8
9. Well, Hillary will reap what her SO has sown in my book.
HC just lost all chance of my vote. Yes, I teettered, but it's a done deal now. Let's she how many RW votes she gets!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hippo_Tron Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-20-06 09:33 PM
Response to Reply #6
15. If Lieberman were running in say Nebraska or Utah you would have a point
But Connecticut voters are reasonably intelligent and Clinton is very popular there like he is in most parts of the country that are reasonably intelligent.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dr Fate Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-20-06 07:01 PM
Response to Original message
11. I would prefer the that Big Dog endorse Lamont, or stay on the porch. n/t
n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ladjf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-20-06 08:11 PM
Response to Original message
12. I can see no evidence that B. Clinton is loyal to the Democratic
Party. He seems to be loyal to his own agenda which includes helping his wife get elected to the WH, regardless of the consequences to the U.S.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cantstandbush Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-20-06 09:22 PM
Response to Original message
13. I am speechless. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
unkachuck Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-20-06 09:30 PM
Response to Original message
14. it's Party control....
....it just looks bad to have a grassroots candidate upset the choosen candidate of the conservative power brokers of the Party....this kind of thing might get out of hand....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hippo_Tron Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-20-06 09:36 PM
Response to Original message
16. Didn't Lieberman support censuring Clinton?
If I were President Clinton I would tell Lieberman to go cheney himself. But I suppose that he is better at pretending to like people than I am and that's part of why he was such a good politician.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
no_hypocrisy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-20-06 10:38 PM
Response to Reply #16
18. If memory serves, Lieberman jumped to his feet days before Newt
in the Senate to condemn Clinton for his actions with an intern. He may have called for his resignation before the republicans did.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LaPera Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-20-06 10:55 PM
Response to Original message
19. The (fucking) Conservative DLC Brotherhood? Lamont is a fine Democrat!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat May 04th 2024, 04:27 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC