Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

From his "Glass House" Lieberman Attacks Lamont's Wife!

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
KoKo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-31-06 05:36 PM
Original message
From his "Glass House" Lieberman Attacks Lamont's Wife!


It just gets more ridiculous, folks. The New York Times reports that at a campaign stop, Sen. Joe Lieberman trotted out a surrogate to attack Ned Lamont's wife. The paper reports that speaking in support of Mr. Lieberman at his stop in Bridgeport, Paul Ganim, who is running in a primary for Bridgeport probate judge, took the criticism of Mr. Lamont even further "surmis that, unlike his own wife, Mr. Lamont’s wife probably never cut out coupons." Ahh, right - because Hadassah Lieberman is just a nice middle-class woman supporting her husband in their nice average lifestyle? I don't think so.

Here's what reporter Joe Conason has previously found:

http://www.workingforchange.com/blog/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
rinsd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-31-06 05:40 PM
Response to Original message
1. David Sirota either can't read or is being deliberately misleading
Paul Ganim is obviously referencing his wife, not Lieberman's.

Misread an article and creat and attack out of it. Yet another hacktackular effort by Sirota.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pale Blue Dot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-31-06 05:47 PM
Response to Reply #1
4. It remains a stupid argument.
No matter who's wife Ganim is refering to.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Demit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-31-06 05:50 PM
Response to Reply #1
6. The NYT article was badly written on that point. Easy reading to take.
They were making such a thing about surrogates campaigning for Lieberman that the phrase "his own wife" could very well look like the comparison was being made between Lieberman's wife and Lamont's.

The more salient point to make would be: how ridiculous is it for a candidate for probate judge to be comparing his own wife to the wife of a candidate for US Senate?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KoKo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-31-06 06:42 PM
Response to Reply #1
8. Hadassah Joined Hill & Knowlton last year. Legendary lobbying, PR Firm!
Edited on Mon Jul-31-06 06:43 PM by KoKo01
From Joe Conason on this:

Joe Conason: Sen. Lieberman Literally in Bed With Drug Lobby

Posted on Jul 12, 2006
By Joe Conason

Editor’s note: In this column, Conason points out that the Connecticut senator who would lecture us on ethics drafted a bill in 2005 that made generous giveaways to pharmaceutical companies—one month after his wife went to work in the pharmaceuticals division of a major lobbying and PR firm.

Whenever Sen. Joseph Lieberman complains that he is the target of a “single-issue” challenge by upstart millionaire Ned Lamont, the three-term incumbent proves he doesn’t quite get what is happening to him. It is true that the Lamont campaign began as a protest against his slavish support of the war in Iraq. It is untrue that growing antiwar sentiment is the sole reason for his peril in next month’s Democratic primary.

That he would dismiss the disastrous occupation as merely “one issue” suggests how remote he is from his constituents—the great majority of whom now view the war as a costly strategic and moral error that should be concluded as soon as possible. He sounds equally detached from that failed policy’s awful reality when he proclaims that “the situation in Iraq is a lot better” than a year ago.

Connecticut’s voters are not obliged to prove their “moderation” by ratifying his bad judgment.

Yet the war issue alone probably would not have threatened him, as anyone who listened carefully to his critics might learn. After 18 years in the Senate, his fervent insistence that he is a lifelong devotee of “progressive causes” and his endorsement by major liberal organizations only seem to mask his accommodation with Washington’s conservative status quo.

Lieberman dutifully recites his opposition to “tax cuts for the rich” and “privatizing Social Security,” and his support of “universal health insurance” and “affordable healthcare.” When he utters those phrases, unfortunately, they ring hollow to many rank-and-file Democrats.

Actually, the syndrome afflicting him is found among entrenched veterans of both parties, especially those who appear more concerned with connections and contributions than values or ideals.

Sen. Lieberman has long been known to cultivate the insurance and pharmaceutical industries, which provide jobs in his home state and contributions to his campaign fund. But he has literally been sleeping with one of their Washington representatives ever since his wife, Hadassah, joined Hill & Knowlton last year. The legendary lobbying and PR firm hired her as a “senior counselor” in its “health and pharmaceuticals practice.”

This news marked Hadassah Lieberman’s return to consulting after more than a decade of retirement. “I have had a life-long commitment to helping people gain better health care,” she said in the press release announcing her new job. “I am excited about the opportunity to work with the talented team at Hill & Knowlton to counsel a terrific stable of clients toward that same goal.”

It would be uplifting to imagine that Hill & Knowlton—after spending the past decade as a defendant in tobacco class-action lawsuits because of its role in propaganda disputing the deadly effects of smoking—is now devoted to improving everybody’s health. More likely, the firm remains devoted to improving the profits of its clientele, which has historically included Enron, the Bank of Credit and Commerce International, Saudis, Kuwaitis, American International Group and Boeing.

When a senator’s wife works for one of the capital’s largest lobby shops, appearances tend to matter. In this case, something happened immediately that didn’t look very good.

http://64.233.187.104/search?q=cache:szAnKhWrSDYJ:www.truthdig.com/report/item/20060712_conason_lieberman_drug_lobby/+Hadassah+Lieberman+works+for+Lobbyist&hl=en&gl=us&ct=clnk&cd=1
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ShortnFiery Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-31-06 05:41 PM
Response to Original message
2. IMO, bringing one's SPOUSE in for an attack is "over the top" eom
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KoKo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-31-06 06:45 PM
Response to Reply #2
9. Really? What if one's Spouse was an Iran or Iraqi SPY?
Where would you draw the line?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Demit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-31-06 05:42 PM
Response to Original message
3. Yeah, right. Hadassah as a high-powered employee of a lobbying firm
for Big Pharm sure ain't cutting out coupons now. As Conason says,

"I'd say its time to tell Joe to join his pharmaceutical lawyer wife in the private sector - I'm sure he'll have no problem finding a nice seven-figure lobbying gig to round out the Lieberman's as Washington's next great corporate power couple."

Lieberman's acts of desperation in the final days before the primary are getting downright baroque. It's like watching an awful but fascinating horror movie.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KoKo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-31-06 06:48 PM
Response to Reply #3
10. HA! can see headline now: "Lieberman appointed new CEO of Pharma Giant..
Merk, Bristol Meyer's, or maybe Phizer Pharma (who just lost their CEO for lack of stock performance and PAY and BACK DATED OPTIONS Package...tops in Industry)

Funny isn't it...how one can go "In and Out of DC' while raking in the Millions.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
napi21 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-31-06 05:47 PM
Response to Original message
5. Read Sorota's response. It's good.
Edited on Mon Jul-31-06 05:48 PM by napi21
The point, of course, is not to make this about which candidate's wife is more middle class. The point is to figure out which candidate is actually more in touch with ordinary folks. Joe Lieberman has racked up a long and distinguished record selling out working people on a variety of economic issues - from his votes for corporate-written trade deals to his vote to help move the bankruptcy bill forward. Ned Lamont, on the other hand, has based his candidacy on populist themes. Thus, I'd say its time to tell Joe to join his pharmaceutical lawyer wife in the private sector - I'm sure he'll have no problem finding a nice seven-figure lobbying gig to round out the Lieberman's as Washington's next great corporate power couple.

http://www.workingforchange.com/blog/

Very few people in congress ever had to clip coupons!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
longship Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-31-06 05:51 PM
Response to Original message
7. Oh Dear!! This isn't going to play well for him.
Lieberman is going to rue the day he allowed this to happen.

Of course, Lieberman is also going to rue the day he became a arrogant, hubristic asshole, if he ever has enough sense to realize it.

More likely, I think he'll just probably just play the role as a persecuted moderate in a radical left-wing Democratic Party.

Tsk, tsk! Shame on you, Joe. It really looks like you are intent on self-destructing, aren't you?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Arugula Latte Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-31-06 06:57 PM
Response to Reply #7
11. I've concluded Joe will never "get it."
He expects utmost loyalty, while he stabs us in the back time after time.

He's bewildered when people turn against him, yet for years he's turned a deaf ears to our cries for him to stand up and fight Bushco. Instead, time and time again, he chose to prop them up while tearing us down.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 02nd 2024, 08:17 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC