CTLawGuy
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Aug-09-06 02:00 AM
Original message |
It is now officially against the rules to advocate for Joe Lieberman |
|
about daaaamn time. Well done Lamont supporters!
DU will be wonderful from now till november.
|
norml
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Aug-09-06 02:07 AM
Response to Original message |
|
HEY JOE Lyrics
HEY JOE, WHERE YOU GOIN' WITH THAT GUN IN YOUR HAND HEY JOE, I SAID WHERE YOU GOIN' WITH THAT GUN IN YOUR HAND I'M GOIN' DOWN TO SHOOT MY OL' LADY YOU KNOW I CAUGHT HER MESSIN' 'ROUND WITH ANOTHER MAN YEAH, I'M GOIN' DOWN TO SHOOT OL'MY LADY YOU KNOW I CAUGHT HER MESSIN' 'ROUND WITH ANOTHER MAN HUH! AND THAT AIN'T TOO COOL
A-HEY JOE, I HEARD YOU SHOT YOUR WOMAN DOWN YOU SHOT HER DOWN NOW A-HEY JOE, I HEARD YOU SHOT YOUR OLD LADY DOWN YOU SHOT HER DOWN IN THE GROUD
YEAH!
YES, I DID, I SHOT HER YOU KNOW I CAUGHT HER MESSIN' ROUND MESSIN' ROUND TOWN UH, YES I DID I SHOT HER YOU KNOW I CAUGHT MY OLD LADY MESSIN' 'ROUND TOWN AND GAVE HER THE GUN AND I SHOT HER
ALRIGHT SHOOT HER ONE MORE TIME AGAIN BABY! YEAH! OH DIG IT OH ALRIGHT
HEY JOE, WHERE YOU GONNA RUN TO NOW WHERE YOU GONNA RUN TO NOW HEY JOE, I SAID WHERE YOU GONNA RUN TO NOW WHERE YOU GONNA GO I'M GOIN' WAY DOWN SOUTH WAY DOWN TO MEXICO WAY, ALRIGHT I'M GOIN' WAY DOWN SOUTH WAY DOWN WHERE I CAN BE FREE AIN'T NO ONE GONNA FIND ME AIN'T NO HANG-MAN GONNA HE AIN'T GONNA PUT A ROPE AROUND ME YOU BETTER BELIEVE IT RIGHT NOW I GOTTA GO NOW HEY, JOE YOU BETTER RUN ON DOWN GOODBYE EVERYBODY HEY HEY JOE
|
countmyvote4real
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Aug-09-06 02:27 AM
Response to Reply #1 |
3. With Democracy lovers like LIEberman, who needs them? |
|
Edited on Wed Aug-09-06 02:30 AM by countmyvote4real
I think that was your point and a poetic way to express it. Thanks for that.
|
dorktv
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Aug-09-06 02:27 AM
Response to Original message |
2. I am sure something else will happen that will make us argue...we ARE |
|
Edited on Wed Aug-09-06 02:28 AM by dorktv
Democrats after all.
*edited spelling*
|
rpannier
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Aug-09-06 03:04 AM
Response to Original message |
|
Oh...you mean the candidate from the Incumbant Party. The man who lost the Dem primary vote and needed only about 6000 votes to get on the ballot. That Joe LieBerman.
|
Crunchy Frog
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Aug-09-06 05:49 AM
Response to Original message |
|
I'm ready with the alert button. :D
|
Douglas Carpenter
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Aug-09-06 07:58 AM
Response to Original message |
6. indeed that's the rules |
|
"You are not permitted to use this message board to work for the defeat of the Democratic Party nominee for any political office. If you wish to work for the defeat of any Democratic candidate in any General Election, then you are welcome to use someone else's bandwidth on some other website.
Democratic Underground may not be used for political, partisan, or advocacy activity by supporters of any political party or candidate other than the Democratic Party or Democratic candidates. Supporters of certain other political parties may use Democratic Underground for limited partisan activities in political races where there is no Democratic Party candidate. "
|
ananda
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Aug-09-06 08:02 AM
Response to Original message |
|
.. because I didn't think anyone here -was- advocating for Lieberman.
Or else they got drowned out by all the ones who saw him for what he was and still do.
I wonder what Schlesinger the R is like. He might win because of what ugly loser Joe will be doing. Is Schlesinger decent?
Sue
|
Solon
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Aug-09-06 08:31 AM
Response to Reply #7 |
9. The only thing that is sure about this election is that... |
|
Schlesinger doesn't have a chance in hell of winning, this is assuming he actually can get himself out of a casino to campaign in the first place. Decent my ass!
|
Crunchy Frog
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Aug-09-06 10:51 AM
Response to Reply #7 |
28. Oh, Lieberman has had his advocates here alright. |
|
I'm hoping that the mods will take the enforcement of this rule seriously.
|
The Count
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Aug-09-06 08:31 AM
Response to Original message |
8. MSM surely does. MSNBC: "Can he win? Suuure he can!" |
|
I noticed lamont's victory speech didn't make it beyond C-Span!
|
cascadiance
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Aug-09-06 09:00 AM
Response to Reply #8 |
14. I got a CNN Breaking News alert on McKinney but not Lamont last night |
|
Edited on Wed Aug-09-06 09:01 AM by calipendence
Hmmm... I wonder why. The sleeper has awakened! Muadib! Muadib!
|
Lerkfish
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Aug-09-06 09:32 AM
Response to Reply #14 |
|
you forgot the apostrophe. LOL just joshing you.
|
krkaufman
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Aug-09-06 09:20 AM
Response to Reply #8 |
16. Ha! Yeah, I can see it now. The MSM will frame Lieberman ... |
|
... an 18 year veteran of the Senate ... as the outsider and underdog. Almost funny.
|
Cha
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Aug-09-06 09:24 AM
Response to Reply #8 |
|
next! The Bloggers are coming!
|
Totally Committed
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Aug-09-06 08:34 AM
Response to Original message |
|
DU will be wonderful from now 'til November. By then, hopefully, NO ONE will want to talk about Lieberman, as he returns to private life.
TC
|
Lerkfish
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Aug-09-06 08:44 AM
Response to Original message |
11. ahh.. that explains the cricket noise from the usual DLC suspects. |
|
I was wondering about that.
|
Fluffdaddy
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Aug-09-06 08:53 AM
Response to Reply #11 |
12. What do you mean by that? |
Solon
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Aug-09-06 08:57 AM
Response to Reply #12 |
13. Just the usual suspects... |
|
Only a couple of posters on this board, not necessarily you, at least some DLCers are principled.
|
Fluffdaddy
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Aug-09-06 09:20 AM
Response to Reply #13 |
15. I was ok with Joe as long as he was running as a dem. Now he's dead |
|
too me Politically. And I'm sure most DLC'ers feel the same way.
|
Lerkfish
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Aug-09-06 09:29 AM
Response to Reply #15 |
20. I'm referring to specific members I cannot name who |
|
admonished us that we needed to hold our nose and vote for Joe if he won the primary, which was a strawman argument because no one said they wouldn't. I just find those particular member's absence in the discussion interesting. I'm not allowed to call out specific members. I apologize if that restriction makes my statements seem overbroad.
|
Solon
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Aug-09-06 09:29 AM
Response to Reply #15 |
21. Its always OK to support your candidate in a primary... |
|
as you did. Just glad you a principled enough to support the winner in the general, some here probably aren't as principled as you, unfortunately. I usually stay out of primary fights in general, during the Presidential primaries back in 2004, I refused to tell people who I supported. The most I usually did was slam people for saying stupid shit occasionally.
Actually, I do that quite a bit, generally I try to only criticize politicians based on something they say or do. For example, I slammed Dean for going on the 700 club, which I view as dumb, at the same time, I slammed Hillary for saying kids today don't work as hard as they did in the past(Same complaint Socrates made in his day), and I criticized Lieberman for his war stance and some first amendment stances he has made in the past and now.
|
LincolnMcGrath
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Aug-09-06 09:28 AM
Response to Reply #11 |
19. Is this what you were hearing? |
krkaufman
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Aug-09-06 09:21 AM
Response to Original message |
17. Lieberation...!!! We're freeeee..... |
|
(Just heard this on Tues night's Majority Report, and had to chuckle.)
|
KKKarl is an idiot
(662 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Aug-09-06 09:29 AM
Response to Original message |
Zynx
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Aug-09-06 09:34 AM
Response to Original message |
24. Ha! I was sick of hearing all their self-righteous nonsense about the |
|
"people of CT". I don't give a damn what Republicans and independents want in CT. I care that we get a true Democratic Senator. I am not interested for a moment in compromising with the Republican Party.
|
gulfcoastliberal
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Aug-09-06 10:32 AM
Response to Original message |
mom cat
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Aug-09-06 10:47 AM
Response to Reply #25 |
27. I think his name was Loserman, or something like that. |
MoonRiver
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Aug-09-06 10:36 AM
Response to Original message |
ShortnFiery
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Aug-09-06 10:54 AM
Response to Original message |
|
I'm all about rules! :P
But seriously, Lamont's going to take it all the way ... and in November he'll win ;).
|
CTLawGuy
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Aug-09-06 10:54 AM
Response to Reply #29 |
31. Somehow I think you'll be ok with this one |
cascadiance
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Aug-09-06 10:54 AM
Response to Original message |
30. When was the last time we had two "independent" senators... |
|
Edited on Wed Aug-09-06 10:55 AM by calipendence
Now that Sore Loserman is no longer a Democrat...
Hopefully in 2006, we'll only have one and that will be a new more progressive one that even many Dems are now.
|
Crunchy Frog
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Aug-09-06 11:30 AM
Response to Original message |
32. I hope that this is actually going to be enforced. |
|
I've already alerted a couple of times. We'll see what happens.
|
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Mon Apr 29th 2024, 03:32 PM
Response to Original message |