Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Dems have had some great new pol strategists on TV lately

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
eleny Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-11-06 01:33 PM
Original message
Dems have had some great new pol strategists on TV lately
I just caught the tail end of two strategists on MSNBC. A woman representing the Dems and a guy representing the Republicans. I wish I had caught the entire segment.

The Dem trounced the Repub. She was a fast talking, fact spouting fountain of information. At the end when the R tried to say that the Dems were against the Patriot Act, she pointed out that it was initially proposed by a Dem, Lieberman. And then she kept repeating that the Repub strategist was "lying" until the segment ended.

I never saw this Dem strategist before. She's one of a number of new faces on tv and I like them. She had short dark hair. I hope to see more of her. Woot!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
eleny Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-11-06 01:35 PM
Response to Original message
1. They're back for another segment!
Edited on Wed Oct-11-06 01:38 PM by eleny
She's Anna Greenberg, Dem. The R is Brad Blakeman.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stopbush Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-11-06 01:43 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. That's Brad "Whistling Past The RW Graveyard" Blakeman. eom
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
eleny Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-11-06 01:47 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. I've seen him before
Greenberg handled his points quite nicely. I liked that she used the "l" word. He didn't quite know what to do with that. I hope we see her on more segments in the weeks ahead. She's unflappable. Matthews needs to get her on his shows. He keeps relying on the weaker Dem strategist. It's getting to be an obvious pattern with him.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tomreedtoon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-11-06 01:51 PM
Response to Original message
4. If she's competent, she won't be a Democrat for long.
She would show up all the lard-asses that have been advising the Democrats for the last eight years. You're acting as if Democrats really WANT to win an election.

"Win? Fight against Daddy Dubya? Of course not, silly!"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
eleny Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-11-06 02:04 PM
Response to Reply #4
6. There are 3 new-to-tv Dem strategists I've noticed
Greenberg is new to me. The other two are also women. One with short blond hair and other long hair. (I wish I could recall their names but this plane crash in NYC has me sort of sideways.) These other two have been on Fox as well as the other cable stations and they're dynamite. Hopefully, they're edging out the old guard. Maybe they bring in better ratings. I hope so as that means all to the networks.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wisteria Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-11-06 01:52 PM
Response to Original message
5. I have noticed that also. Good news as far as I am concerned.
We had some poor representation in 04.
I would also suggest we distance ourselves from Carville and Begallia. Let them be classified as independent pundits. The are wrong more than they are right regarding our party.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
faithnotgreed Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-11-06 02:21 PM
Response to Original message
7. if thats true it is worth a big kick
thanks for sharing the specifics - good to hear that there are some fightin dems on the corporate shows
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
eleny Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-11-06 02:44 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. Thanks and you're welcome!
It's a breath of fresh air not to have to worry when our guys open their mouths on the tv.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
politicasista Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-11-06 03:17 PM
Response to Original message
9. Too bad they weren't around in 2000 and 2004
Better late than never I guess.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat May 04th 2024, 05:23 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC