Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

AP: "Bush Keeps Revising War Justification"

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Sparkly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-14-06 01:27 PM
Original message
AP: "Bush Keeps Revising War Justification"
(They just noticed?)
Bush keeps revising war justification

By TOM RAUM 1 hour, 42 minutes ago

WASHINGTON -President Bush keeps revising his explanation for why the U.S. is in Iraq, moving from narrow military objectives at first to history-of-civilization stakes now.

Initially, the rationale was specific: to stop Saddam Hussein from using what Bush claimed were the Iraqi leader's weapons of mass destruction or from selling them to al-Qaida or other terrorist groups.

But 3 1/2 years later, with no weapons found, still no end in sight and the war a liability for nearly all Republicans on the ballot Nov. 7, the justification has become far broader and now includes the expansive "struggle between good and evil."
http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20061014/ap_on_go_pr_wh/bush_iraq


This reminds me of PJ Crowley's "Why We Went In"...

* Version 1.0 - Saddam Hussein is an imminent threat
* Version 1.01 - Saddam Hussein is a gathering threat
* Version 1.02 - Saddam Hussein poses a real and dangerous threat
* Version 1.1 - The smoking gun will be a mushroom cloud
* Version 1.2 - We can't afford to wait
* Version 1.3 - We never said imminent
* Version 1.3.1 - OK, maybe we did say it once or twice
* Version 1.4 - We should have been more precise

It goes on through Version 10....
http://www.americanprogress.org/issues/2004/03/b38989.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
leftchick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-14-06 01:34 PM
Response to Original message
1. on the upside....
<snip>

The more ominous and determined his words, the more skeptical the American public appears, polls show, both on the war itself and over whether it is part of the larger fight against terrorism, as the administration insists.

Bush's approval rating, reflected by AP-Ipsos polls, has slid from the mid 60s at the outset of the U.S.-led invasion in March 2003 to the high 30s now. There were light jumps upward after the December 2003 capture of Saddam, Bush's re-election in November 2004 and each of three series of aggressive speeches over the past year. Those gains tended to vanish quickly.

With the war intruding on the fall elections, both parties have stepped up their rhetoric.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Buns_of_Fire Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-14-06 01:41 PM
Response to Original message
2. The "struggle between good and evil"...
Edited on Sat Oct-14-06 01:41 PM by Buns_of_Fire
Sounds positively biblical, doesn't it? And it'll have just as much success as the War(s) Against Nouns, Adverbs, Adjectives, States of Being, Military Tactics, Excessive Nose Hair, and Naughty Bodily Functions.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
unblock Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-14-06 01:53 PM
Response to Original message
3. "bush keeps lying"
not a single "justification" has been the truth.

the liar who claimed he didn't pay attention to polls and who said that the other guy would "say or do anything" keeps shifting from one lie to another in the constant search for higher poll numbers.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kurth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-14-06 02:59 PM
Response to Original message
4. The Islamofascists have gone extinct:
"The "fascism" phrase abruptly disappeared from Bush's speeches"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sparkly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-14-06 03:02 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. I noticed that, too!
I think it may have been because it was too difficult for Chimpy to pronounce. ("Islamofasciststsstsss...")
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-14-06 05:22 PM
Response to Original message
6. ah, the bushi ladies get credit for getting the Islamic fascism out of spe
eches.




For a while last summer, Bush depicted the war as one against "Islamic fascism," borrowing a phrase from conservative commentators. The strategy backfired, further fanning anti-American sentiment across the Muslim world.

The "fascism" phrase abruptly disappeared from Bush's speeches, reportedly after he was talked out of it by Secretary of State
Condoleezza Rice and Karen Hughes, a longtime Bush confidant now with the State Department.

Hughes said she would not disclose private conversations with the president. But, she told the AP, she did not use the "fascism" phrase herself. "I use `violent extremist,'" she said.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-14-06 05:27 PM
Response to Original message
7. "Setting the Record Straight" - Bush Administration responds
posted on DU but seems to fit here:

http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=364x2395299

Sat Oct-14-06 04:57 PM
Original message
"Setting the Record Straight" - Bush Administration responds

I know you're just beside yourself with anticipation.

The Whitehouse will post their spin to the latest headlines under the heading Setting the Record Straight

The Associated Press Claims "President Bush Keeps Revising His Explanation For Why The U.S. Is In Iraq, Moving From Narrow Military Objectives At First To History-Of-Civilization Stakes Now."

Bush Regime spin is:

* President Bush Has Consistently Pointed To Liberating Iraqis From A Brutal Ruler, Including Before The War.

* President Bush Has Consistently Emphasized The Importance Of Spreading Democracy In The Middle East, Including Before The War.




So we see the Bush Regime will downplay their constantly repeated lies about WMD and the threat Saddam Hussein was to America.




The Associated Press Alleges The President Calls Iraq The "Central Front" In The War On Terror For Political Purposes.

Bush Regime spin is:

* The Terrorists Consider Iraq "The Central Battlefield" In The War On Terror.

* As Early As February 1998, Osama Bin Laden Made It Clear That He Not Only Intended To Wage War On The United States, But He Wanted To Use Iraq As A Central Battleground.



So you see, it's not that Bush thinks this - it's that the terrorists think this...and the man they claim no one knew about or had heard of before 2001, was the one who made Iraq the "central front" in the war on terror.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-14-06 05:31 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. Most Emailed story is Bush keeps revising war justification.


Sat Oct-14-06 04:55 PM
Original message
Most Emailed story is Bush keeps revising war justification. Lets do

Edited on Sat Oct-14-06 05:04 PM by rodeodance
so more emailing, viewing, etc.

edited for link:

http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20061014/ap_on_go_pr_wh/bush... ;_ylt=AvHUpGFOKtuxsAA6vivS2P2s0NUE;_ylu=X3oDMTA3ODdxdHBhBHNlYwM5NjQ-



* Most Emailed
* Most Viewed
* Most Recommended
* My Sources

Most Emailed

* Bush keeps revising war justification AP - 1 hour, 27 minutes ago
* Studds, 1st openly gay congressman, dies AP - 1 hour, 33 minutes ago
* Spider Silk Could Repair Human Ligaments SPACE.com / LiveScience.com - Sat Oct 14, 8:00 AM ET
* Troops battle 10-foot marijuana plants Reuters - Fri Oct 13, 8:48 AM ET
* Tex-Mex singer Freddy Fender dies at 69 AP - 30 minutes ago
"Glory Days"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-14-06 05:40 PM
Response to Original message
9. 3.5 stars
RECOMMEND THIS STORY

Your Recommendation:

Average (1149 votes)
3.5 stars
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Auggie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-14-06 08:52 PM
Response to Original message
10. The bad news, I think, is that some people are still buying this b.s, but
the good news is that more people are not.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sparkly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-14-06 10:33 PM
Response to Reply #10
11. Amazing that anybody is, isn't it? nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Doctor_J Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-14-06 10:50 PM
Response to Reply #11
12. Not really
Limbeciles will believe anything that Rusty and insHannity tell them. They are brainwashed. They believe that trees cause pollution, that Bill Clinton killed Vince Foster and Ron Brown, that sea level won't rise when the polar ice caps melt, that "someone is trying to take away Christmas", that the Earth is 4,000 years old, and that Smirk is really smart. Here's a likely scenario:

Thursday: Rove decides that demonizing "round-Earthers" will garner a few votes in November
Friday: Rush, Sean, Bill, Ann, Laura, Laura, Matthews, Gallagher, Ollie, G. Gordon, everyone on Fox News, MSNBC, and CNN begin the chorus of "these pointy-headed left-wing radicals are brainwashing our kids into believing the Earth is round. Next they'll be telling you that Hillary should be president. How did our schools get so infested with round-Earthers?"
Monday: They're still at it folks. Did you notice how the media is all against us on this flat-Earth issue?"
Tuesday: Fox News Poll: 48% of Americans believe the Earth is flat
Wednesday: NYT proves it is part o fthe Liberal Conspiracy by running the headline "Opinions differ on shape of Earth"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
katinmn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-14-06 11:18 PM
Response to Original message
13. How could they leave out: "To bring freedom and democracy to Iraqis?"
That one was the top justification for the whole second year of the war!

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lasher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-14-06 11:33 PM
Response to Original message
14. Blazing Trousers
From the article:

The administration recently has been "doing a much better job" in explaining the stakes, Card said in an interview. "We never said it was going to be easy. The president always told us it would be long and tough."


Really? But I thought you said...

2/13/02 Former assistant to Rumsfield, Ken Aldeman: "I believe demolishing Hussein's military power and liberating Iraq would be a cakewalk."
http://www.washingtonpost.com/ac2/wp-dyn/A1996-2002Feb12?language=printer

11/14/02 Rumsfeld: "Five days or five weeks or five months, but it certainly isn’t going to last any longer than that. It won’t be a World War III."

2/7/03 Rumsfeld: "It could last, you know, six days, six weeks. I doubt six months."

3/16/03 Cheney: "My belief is we will, in fact, be greeted as liberators."

3/27/03 Paul Wolfowitz: "We’re dealing with a country that can really finance its own reconstruction, and relatively soon."
http://www.cnn.com/2004/ALLPOLITICS/04/15/bush.oil/


These "cakewalk" claims were repeated by administration officials until the war in Iraq had started. Once they had sold us that bottle of snake oil they switched to the "long hard slog" story, in order to manage our expectations.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
beltanefauve Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-15-06 10:45 PM
Response to Reply #14
20. It wasn't supposed to
cause a lot of deaths, either. Remember all the talk in the beginning of, "smart bombs"?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lasher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-16-06 12:42 AM
Response to Reply #20
21. This was part of the deliberate pimping of the Iraq war
I feel comfortable in saying deliberate, in part because administration officials all changed their stories at once. Before 9/11 Colin and Condi both said Saddam was not a threat. After 9/11 they and others said often and loudly that he was. We got this 'cakewalk' thing before the invasion and in unison they suddenly changed to their 'hard slog' story as soon as we had invaded.

I can't wait for the Congressional hearings next year.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
liberal N proud Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-15-06 09:03 AM
Response to Original message
15. Lies lead to bigger lies and eventually they implode upon the liar
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bucky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-15-06 09:32 AM
Response to Original message
16. K + R = bookmark
ty, Sparks
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madrchsod Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-15-06 11:14 AM
Response to Original message
17. no one is listening anymore
he is finished as a president
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
George II Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-15-06 04:43 PM
Response to Original message
18. "struggle between good and evil."
Might it better be characterized as "struggle between evil and more evil"?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
francium22 Donating Member (2 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-15-06 06:12 PM
Response to Original message
19. bush sucks
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 30th 2024, 05:23 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC