Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Is the Winner of US 2004 Elections...Iran? (dragged post out of archive)

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
KoKo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-02-06 06:19 PM
Original message
Is the Winner of US 2004 Elections...Iran? (dragged post out of archive)
David Zephyr (1000+ posts) Wed Nov-03-04 04:56 PM
Original message
The Winner of the U.S. 2004 Election? The New Nuclear Power, Iran

The biggest winner in the U.S. election last night was, without a doubt, the fundamentalist regime in Iran who flushed with the pride of their newly acquired international trump card, nuclear weapons, now stand ready to help George W. Bush solve his dilemma by taking control of Iraq. And they will take control without ever using their miltary divisions now perched on the Iraqi border because George W. Bush will help them.

Iran now holds every card in Iraq. Indeed every "solution" to preventing chaos and civil war there involves cutting some deal that turns control of the former Iraq (65% Shi'a) over to Iran (89% Shi'a). There are, of course, many ways for this inevitable outcome to play out, but whether it comes through the election of a Shi'a government in the proposed Iraqi elections next year or by another avenue, it will happen.

George Bush and Dick Cheney, with their failed military excursion into the former, non-secular Iraq --- which was once most effectively contained by economic sanctions, military no-fly zones and U.N. inspections --- have now left themselves and the world with the deplorable option of swapping most, if not all, of territorial Iraq for a phony peace arrangement which will allow the Bush Administration to save face, pull our troops out of Iraq "with honor" and declare a victory for "democracy".

And, of course, there will be a psyche-soothing and great national celebration at home here in the U.S. in celebration of our great military "victory" complete with a ticker tape parade in Manhattan with Fox News and the Corporate Media dutifully beaming it to us with the fine touch of Lee Greenwood howling, "God Bless the U.S.A.". Americans will be encouraged to congratulate themselves and stroke themselves with pride how we took democracy to the Middle East.

And the newly structured Greater Iran will then control 20-25% of all the known oil reserves in the world and over 35% of all oil exported from the Persian Gulf.

Consider the sobering irony of Bush II turning over Iraq (of course, it must never be called a "turn over") to Iran when it was Bush I and Ronald Reagan who had empowered Saddam Hussein in the 1980's with billions of dollars of support and weapons to make war with Iran. If Bush II turns over Iraq to Iran, one must ask how many billions of U.S. taxpayer dollars were pissed away during the Iraq/Iran War in the 1980's along with the nearly $200 Billion in the current "Operation Iraqi Freedom" and its aftermath? How many lives, civilian and military, were lost between 1980 and today in first propping up Saddam Hussein to fight Iran only to later topple him from power and turn Iraq over to Iran?

There will, of course, be voices from within the Neocon circles that have GW Bush's ear encouraging him to invade Iran. And it won't be just the Neocons. Ariel Sharon in an unholy alliance with the Sunni Saudis "Royals", who will mutually (and correctly) fear the rise of Greater Iran, will also weigh in heavily for taking action against Iran, but it won't happen.

It won't happen because even Dick Cheney and Donald Rumsfeld know that our military could not win in such a scenario and that the consequences would be catastrophic and unthinkable. No, our current president will look to the example that his father left him during the Persian Gulf War in the 1980's: pull out and declare a great victory.

The better solution would have been to divide Iraq quickly (after the inexcusable and unplanned invasion) into self-governing entities with the Kurds and Sunnis as players which would have prevented civil war and had some modicum of fairness. But that day is done.

The Iranians have been playing American presidents for fools for years now and doing so brilliantly. Just ask Ahmed Chalabi or Oliver North if you have any doubts.

So, the big winner in the U.S. election was the current Iranian government. It certainly wasn't the American taxpayer or its soldiers.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Muddy Waters Guitar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-02-06 08:02 PM
Response to Original message
1. Yeah, that's even more true in November of 2006
Iran and al-Qaeda have both been the big winners of the 2004 election and the Bush Administration's continuing fiasco in Iraq. Bush took out a mutual enemy to both of them, and has completely and utterly failed to introduce anything remotely resembling a working and viable administration there.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
David Zephyr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-02-06 08:33 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. KoKo01 was kind to repost this: We went to war to turn Iraq over to Iran.
Thanks for your comments, Muddy Waters Guitar.

Iran holds all the cards, including their nuclear card which Bush & Cheney have to let them have in order to have any peace and stability in the old Iraq.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 08:30 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC