Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

If Haggard had only kept his mouth shut

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
BOSSHOG Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-03-06 03:28 PM
Original message
If Haggard had only kept his mouth shut
until after the prostitute may have not successfully passed the lie detector test. Just think of the contortions over at free republic. But gosh, he opened his mouth and admitted to stuff; so I guess it continues to suck being a member of free republic.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
gfnrob Donating Member (551 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-03-06 03:31 PM
Response to Original message
1. I think
Jones failed the test by saying he did NOT sell meth. Can't blame him, I wouldn't admit to a felony.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
skiddlybop Donating Member (408 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-03-06 03:32 PM
Response to Original message
2. Oh no you didn't...
keep his mouth shut...heh...sucks to be a freeper...heh...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheCowsCameHome Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-03-06 03:35 PM
Response to Original message
3. Very appropriate subject line.
Oh sorry, I thought you meant when he was with Mike Jones.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BOSSHOG Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-03-06 03:39 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. Now that would have been a failed date!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheCowsCameHome Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-03-06 03:40 PM
Response to Reply #4
6. Certainly a waste of Ted's parishoners money.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tempest Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-03-06 03:40 PM
Response to Original message
5. The voice messages did Haggard in
A nationally recognized voice specialist listened to the messages and said it was Haggard.

The results of a lie detector test wouldn't have made any difference.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheCowsCameHome Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-03-06 03:42 PM
Response to Reply #5
8. Even gargling couldn't help poor 'ol Ted................
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tempest Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-03-06 04:20 PM
Response to Reply #8
11. LOFL!!!
Thanks a lot, now I have to clean up the ice tea from my keyboard!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
progressivebydesign Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-03-06 03:42 PM
Response to Original message
7. He didn't fail the lie detector. Why are people pushing that here?
The lie detector operator (whomever he was) felt there were "deceptions". That does not mean you failed a test. IT was suggested that Jones come back next week when he's not sleep and food deprived, and perhaps calmer.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BOSSHOG Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-03-06 03:52 PM
Response to Reply #7
10. Objection!
I did not say he failed the test. I said he "may have not sucessfully passed." I stand by my parsing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
flyingfysh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-03-06 03:46 PM
Response to Original message
9. ironically, lie detector machines are worthless
It has long been known that these machines are unreliable and easy to fool. But the US government insists on using them anyway.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 09:00 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC