cali
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Nov-04-06 02:08 PM
Original message |
|
Exercise a little restraint and stop posting breathless "Lieberman will switch", and there's no way they won't steal it posts, not to mention, Kerry is through posts. It's less than 4 days until the election, and we don't need this sort of negativity. Personally, I think you're wrong: Lieberman will stay a dem, we're going to win the House, picking up 25+ seats, pick up 4 or 5 or more Senate seats, and John Kerry is our ally- not our enemy. If I'm wrong, feel free to lord it over me after the election, but please, wait until then.
|
CrispyQ
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Nov-04-06 02:10 PM
Response to Original message |
MH1
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Nov-04-06 02:17 PM
Response to Original message |
AlamoDemoc
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Nov-04-06 02:25 PM
Response to Original message |
3. you wrote .."Lieberman will stay a dem.." |
|
If he was democrat, why then would he not listen the will of the CT democrats that voted him out?
|
cali
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Nov-04-06 02:32 PM
Response to Reply #3 |
6. OK, I dashed it out. You caught me. |
|
I meant to say he'll caucus with the dems.
|
movonne
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Nov-04-06 02:26 PM
Response to Original message |
4. I disagree with you...Lieberman is a repug, do you think that the |
|
repugs wants him in is because he will vote dem...it might on some issues but the war NO...and I just can't understand how ct. could even think about putting him back in...and that goes for a good majority of repugs, I can't believe they want this war anymore than we do..
|
Infinite Hope
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Nov-04-06 03:11 PM
Response to Reply #4 |
17. They want him in because he's less liberal than Lamont. |
|
Edited on Sat Nov-04-06 03:12 PM by Infinite Hope
DUH, freaking DUH!
That doesn't mean they'd rather have him than Schlesinger. They are just being pragmatic. They know the winner will be Lieberman or Lamont. Bother are overall liberals. But Lieberman is less liberal on the war.
|
applegrove
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Nov-04-06 02:28 PM
Response to Original message |
LeftishBrit
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Nov-04-06 02:36 PM
Response to Original message |
7. Best vibes from across the pond for a GREAT result! |
|
The worse the election news is for Bush, the better it is for the world!
|
cali
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Nov-04-06 02:39 PM
Response to Reply #7 |
|
for caring and for the good wishes. You're right. This election isn't just important for us, it's critical for the entire world.
|
Warren Stupidity
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Nov-04-06 02:44 PM
Response to Original message |
9. Joe Lieberman (Asshole, Neocon) is not a Democrat. |
|
He might or might not caucus with the Democratic Party. Other than that you have some good points.
|
KKKarl is an idiot
(662 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Nov-04-06 02:45 PM
Response to Original message |
|
Lieberman has been a long standing democratic party member. No reason for him to jump ship. I think the repubs are hopeful he will jump ship, but they are wrong.John Kerry botched a joke not an election. Fox can have it's say in the matter, while it may swing a few votes away it is not enough to stop the clean sweep of the house & senate.
|
The Count
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Nov-04-06 02:46 PM
Response to Original message |
11. Lieberman will NOT switch - will follow the same masters he always did. |
|
As for stealing - I'm just quietly bookmarking all the poll threads for later analysis.
|
The Magistrate
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Nov-04-06 02:54 PM
Response to Reply #11 |
13. What Masters Are Those, Count? |
|
"Enquiring minds want to know...."
|
The Count
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Nov-04-06 10:12 PM
Response to Reply #13 |
25. Unlike him, not kiss& tell |
|
Edited on Sat Nov-04-06 10:12 PM by The Count
He's been spotted kissing them though...
|
smoogatz
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Nov-04-06 02:50 PM
Response to Original message |
12. If the Dems fail to take the Senate by at least two seats, Joe will flip. |
|
He'll owe the Republicans too many favors not to. Plus, you can bet they've already offered him his pick of committee chairmanships. I'll bet you $13.47.
|
cali
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Nov-04-06 02:56 PM
Response to Reply #12 |
|
No way is Lieberman gonna switich. There are many reasons why not, but this is enough for me: my mother who's known him for years and has been very involved in CT dem politics for nearly 40 years, says he won't, and it's not 'cause she's voting for him- she isn't.
|
smoogatz
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Nov-04-06 03:02 PM
Response to Reply #14 |
15. He'll switch. He's into them for millions now. |
|
Who do you think has been financing and running his "indy" campaign? Just wait 'til January, when the new Congress convenes. And warm up your PayPal account--that $13.47's gonna buy smoogatz most of a 12-pack of Newcastle's.
|
cali
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Nov-04-06 03:10 PM
Response to Reply #15 |
16. Just out of curiosity |
|
how well do you know CT politics? I may not live there now, but I grew up in Fairfield County, and all of my family- all active in dem circles- live there. None of them thinks Joe will switch. and the money thing is a canard. Lieberman has just as much funding from dems.
|
smoogatz
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Nov-04-06 05:29 PM
Response to Reply #16 |
23. I've been following the Lieberman/Lamont race pretty closely-- |
|
on Kos and elsewhere. And one thing that's evident is that a lot of CT Dem voters have a higher opinion of Joe's honesty than seems justified. He's anything but a party loyalist, as his indy run demonstrates--he's just another political opportunist looking for a way to hold onto power. That being the case, what's to stop him from jumping if the pot is sweet enough?
|
cali
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Nov-04-06 09:17 PM
Response to Reply #23 |
|
For one, Lieberman is a legacy kind of guy, and like most of the people we end up characterizing in tired evil/good terms, he's more complex than your cardboard cutout politician. He would--undoubtedly- forfeit his future career, and he'd be a pariah to the majority of voters in his state. Lieberman may not be honest, but I've never seen any evidence of his dishonesty. I just don't know, and neither do you.
|
The Count
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Nov-04-06 10:16 PM
Response to Reply #24 |
26. "never seen any evidence of his dishonesty"? You jest of course. |
|
The mere fact that he pretends to be a democrat is dishonest. The fact that he's bought & paid by insurance companies or that during the primaries in 2004 he was on Fox saying that all the Dem candidates deserved to lose because "they were giving this war a bad name" seems pretty damn dishonest to me. But what do I know? :shrug:
|
smoogatz
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Nov-04-06 11:30 PM
Response to Reply #24 |
28. I know that he's willing to throw his party under the bus in order to stay |
|
in the Senate. And that says a lot to me, frankly.
|
onenote
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Nov-04-06 04:53 PM
Response to Reply #15 |
20. do the math: Lieberman isn't getting a committee chairmanship |
|
from the repubs. There are 17 standing Senate Committees; there are another half dozen or so select or joint committees. Which repub senator is going to be told he/she doesn't get a chairmanship to make room for Joe? Not. Going. To.Happen.
|
smoogatz
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Nov-04-06 05:25 PM
Response to Reply #20 |
22. If it means the difference between the Repigs being the majority |
|
or not, of course they will. What's the better deal--16 senior Repig chairmen + Joe, or being the minority and having control of nothing?
|
bunny planet
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Nov-04-06 04:35 PM
Response to Original message |
onenote
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Nov-04-06 04:46 PM
Response to Original message |
|
A breath of rational fresh air!!
|
mitchtv
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Nov-04-06 04:55 PM
Response to Original message |
21. What about "Angelides is running the worst campaign in history' posts? |
tulip
(344 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Nov-04-06 10:52 PM
Response to Original message |
|
Kick it Cali!!!!! Well done.
|
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Thu Apr 25th 2024, 04:52 AM
Response to Original message |