Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

1999 war games: Iraq "would have ended up with a failed state even with 400,000 troops"

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-04-06 10:27 PM
Original message
1999 war games: Iraq "would have ended up with a failed state even with 400,000 troops"

1999 war games foresaw problems in Iraq

By JOHN HEILPRIN, Associated Press Writer 2 hours, 45 minutes ago

WASHINGTON - The U.S. government conducted a series of secret war games in 1999 that anticipated an invasion of Iraq would require 400,000 troops, and even then chaos might ensue.

In its "Desert Crossing" games, 70 military, diplomatic and intelligence officials assumed the high troop levels would be needed to keep order, seal borders and take care of other security needs.

The documents came to light Saturday through a Freedom of Information Act request by the George Washington University's National Security Archive, an independent research institute and library.

"The conventional wisdom is the U.S. mistake in Iraq was not enough troops," said Thomas Blanton, the archive's director. "But the Desert Crossing war game in 1999 suggests we would have ended up with a failed state even with 400,000 troops on the ground."

more...


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
John Q. Citizen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-04-06 10:33 PM
Response to Original message
1. A failed state was the bush plan all along. bush went for a two fer.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MannyGoldstein Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-04-06 10:42 PM
Response to Original message
2. Wasn't This Anthony Zinni's Exercise?
I believe that this was run at Clinton's request - this is why the adults decided to not invade Iraq.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Make7 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-04-06 10:54 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. Yes; here's the link to the National Security Archives' report:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MannyGoldstein Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-04-06 10:59 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. This is Somewhat Dated News
Zinni was talking about this several months ago - Clinton asked him to look at this, and Zinni reported back that it wouldn't work. The Rethugs, at the time (several months ago), tried to spin this as "see, even Zinni wanted to attack Iraq - but Clinton was too chicken". Unbelievable, these Rethugs.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-04-06 11:22 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. None of this is new, except the release of the Documents. What is mind boggling
is that people know it can't work, but refuse to say definitively that we need to get out. It's all been in the news before:

http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_mesg&forum=132&topic_id=2558484&mesg_id=2558484


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Make7 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-04-06 11:23 PM
Response to Reply #4
6. Yes, it is. Zinni spoke publicly about 'Desert Crossing' at UCLA in 2004.
But as far as I know, this information on the 'National Security Archive' site is the first release by the government of any of the documentation related to this particular scenario.


Spin is pretty much all they ever do, but at least now there is a documentary record that can be pointed to in order to demonstrate how incorrect that spin actually is.

- Make7
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-04-06 11:35 PM
Response to Original message
7. Sniper Attacks Adding to Peril of U.S. Troops

Sniper Attacks Adding to Peril of U.S. Troops



Sgt. Jesse E. Leach of the Marines assisted Lance Cpl. Juan Valdez-Castillo, who was shot by a sniper in the town of Karma. He survived.

By C. J. CHIVERS
Published: November 4, 2006

KARMA, Iraq, Nov. 3 — The bullet passed through Lance Cpl. Juan Valdez-Castillo as his Marine patrol moved down a muddy urban lane. It was a single shot. The lance corporal fell against a wall, tried to stand and fell again.

His squad leader, Sgt. Jesse E. Leach, faced where the shot had come from, raised his rifle and grenade launcher and quickly stepped between the sniper and the bloodied marine. He walked backward, scanning, ready to fire.

Shielding the marine with his own thick body, he grabbed the corporal by a strap and dragged him across a muddy road to a line of tall reeds, where they were concealed. He put down his weapon, shouted orders and cut open the lance corporal’s uniform, exposing a bubbling wound.

Lance Corporal Valdez-Castillo, shot through the right arm and torso, was saved. But the patrol was temporarily stuck. The marines were engaged in the task of calling for a casualty evacuation while staring down their barrels at dozens of windows that faced them, as if waiting for a ghost’s next move.

This sequence on Tuesday here in Anbar Province captured in a matter of seconds an expanding threat in the war in Iraq. In recent months, military officers and enlisted marines say, the insurgents have been using snipers more frequently and with greater effect, disrupting the military’s operations and fueling a climate of frustration and quiet rage.

Across Iraq, the threat has become serious enough that in late October the military held an internal conference about it, sharing the experiences of combat troops and discussing tactics to counter it. There has been no ready fix.

more...


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NoAmericanTaliban Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-04-06 11:43 PM
Response to Original message
8. CNN link - too bad the neo-cons knew better
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 07:24 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC