thatsrightimirish
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Nov-05-06 01:14 PM
Original message |
Does the Mason Dixon poll lean to the right? |
|
I'm looking at their results with amazement. Chafer is now leading, Corker is up by 12, and Montana is tied? I can believe that montana is tied but the other two I don't.
|
jefferson_dem
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Nov-05-06 01:16 PM
Response to Original message |
1. Yes. MD has a history of repuke-friendly polls. n/t |
cobaindrain
(731 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Nov-05-06 01:18 PM
Response to Original message |
Nite Owl
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Nov-05-06 01:27 PM
Response to Original message |
3. I think that they do lean right |
|
but what worries me is that they need a poll to point to if they try to pull this off by voter fraud and suppression. This gives them a poll to point to and say see there was a poll that said we were winning, guess that one was right. I have no doubt that the races that are close are winnable by the dem candidate but these are the ones that need to watched at the polling places most closely.
|
Mass
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Nov-05-06 01:34 PM
Response to Original message |
4. all their poll is from RV only, not LV. |
|
In TN, there is a series of polls since the Corker ad showing that the ad has worked. RI is surprising. The issue here is to know who among these registered voters will go to vote and who will not.
|
fujiyama
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Nov-05-06 01:38 PM
Response to Original message |
5. The Rasmussen poll also show MT to have narrowed |
|
RI was always going to be closer than earlier polls showed. A one point lead is pretty meaningless. Chafee's name still carries weight in the state, though I think a lot of people there realize a republican is a republican any way you look at it.
I also think Corker's lead is exaggerated in this poll but it does appear it is slipping away from Ford.
|
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Fri Apr 26th 2024, 08:16 AM
Response to Original message |