Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Army Times: Editorial -Time for Rumsfeld to go (here it is folks)

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-05-06 03:54 PM
Original message
Army Times: Editorial -Time for Rumsfeld to go (here it is folks)


November 04, 2006
http://www.armytimes.com/story.php/?f=1-292925-2333360.php

Editorial
Time for Rumsfeld to go


“So long as our government requires the backing of an aroused and informed public opinion ... it is necessary to tell the hard bruising truth.”

That statement was written by Pulitzer Prize-winning war correspondent Marguerite Higgins more than a half-century ago during the Korean War.

But until recently, the “hard bruising” truth about the Iraq war has been difficult to come by from leaders in Washington.

One rosy reassurance after another has been handed down by President Bush, Vice President Cheney and Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld: “mission accomplished,” the insurgency is “in its last throes,” and “back off,” we know what we’re doing, are a few choice examples.

Military leaders generally toed the line, although a few retired generals eventually spoke out from the safety of the sidelines, inciting criticism equally from anti-war types, who thought they should have spoken out while still in uniform, and pro-war foes, who thought the generals should have kept their critiques behind closed doors.

Now, however, a new chorus of criticism is beginning to resonate. Active-duty military leaders are starting to voice misgivings about the war’s planning, execution and dimming prospects for success.



http://www.militarycity.com/discussions/showthread.php?t=549
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Canuckistanian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-05-06 03:57 PM
Response to Original message
1. They ignore this at their peril
Wow, they've even got the "back off" quote in there.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Canuckistanian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-05-06 04:06 PM
Response to Original message
2. One post from the Forum:
USMC1stSgtRetired
Guest

Posts: n/a
Default Re: Discuss the editorial
Been to Iraq. Seen the goat fuck. I've been saying since 2003 this is like Vietnam. we live in base camps, go out, take ground, and give it back. Instead of jungles, urban areas. Instead of VC, we have the Muj. It did not have to be this way. If we would have gone in in force, instead of thinking once we ousted Saddam, all the different groups there would sit down and sing kumbaya together, this mission wouldn't have drifted into the chaos that it has. Not only should Rumsfeld go, but Bush shoud be out the door two steps in front of him. He's the Commander in Chief. In the military, a commander reaps the rewards for success, or takes reponsibility for failure. By the way, I am a life-long Republican. I hated Clinton, almost got out while he was President. As a republican, I think Bush has set our party back 50 years.
Reply With Quote


And he's not alone. About 90% agree with the article.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-05-06 04:09 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. yes, he is right. The GENEals have a huge stake in this
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-05-06 04:10 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. they do not want to leave Iraq like they left Vietnam
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-05-06 04:10 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. k
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-05-06 04:11 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. k
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-05-06 04:11 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. k
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-05-06 04:11 PM
Response to Reply #8
9. k
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-05-06 04:11 PM
Response to Reply #9
10. k
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-05-06 04:12 PM
Response to Reply #10
11. k
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-05-06 04:07 PM
Response to Original message
3. It is short and so so SWEET
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 23rd 2024, 09:55 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC