Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

A Good "First Target" For House Investigative Subpoena Power

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Parisle Donating Member (849 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-06-06 07:42 PM
Original message
A Good "First Target" For House Investigative Subpoena Power
----When the democrats take the House by a somewhat comfortable margin on Tuesday, they'll gain the crucial powers to issue subpoenas and conduct investigations into the myriad lies, scams and malfeasance of the neocon Bush junta. They will be like the proverbial kids in the candy store of corruption and criminality. Where to start? What to choose? They would do well to approach these matters in the most useful and effective sequence, both substantively and politically.

----There are so many scandals and crooked deals to investigate,... so many constitutional transgressions to be reversed or dismantled. Democratic supporters are apt to be in a rush to get to the bottom of Plame, Gannon, Abramoff, et al, all in a headlong rush,... or to take legislative aim at the Patriot Act, NSA domestic spying or the Military Commissions Act with similar haste. That would be too many things going on at the same time. The significant uptake on how this administration has operated could be substantially lost on the public,... waylaid and diluted by squishy media and a general atmosphere of confusion. This could cost the democrats the positive trajectory of "popular awareness" they have enjoyed for some time now. Campaigning, in the sense of securing public trust, awareness and approval, does not end on Wednesday. The democrats have to keep engineering their ultimate comeback, and here is what they should do.

----Go after VP Cheney's secretive Energy Panel meetings first, with the logical emphasis falling on Enron, Halliburton and Big Oil, and the question of "Why were these meetings so secret?" Tactically and strategically, this is the democrats' best course.

----The issues accruing to the NSA, to the Patriot Act and the Military Commissions Act would all entail dragging White House counsel into the action. Gonzalez could exercise his ponderous ability to obfuscate. Partisan security divisions would be called into play. Terrorism and "the war" would hold too much sway on the arguments being advanced. National security would become the litmus test of every inquiry. It would get convoluted and nasty where the general electorate was concerned. And the democrats might only have the House. It will be too early for constitutional issues. The Energy Panel meetings offer the best, safest opportunity to keep the public's perception on a productive path towards complete rejection of the neocons.

----We encounter the broadest degree of popular electoral agreement on issues like Enron's fraud and Halliburton's likely overcharges to the government. People don't like cheats. And reasoning suggests that Cheney's Energy Panel meetings, coming in advance of even the 9-11 attacks, may offer a chilling blueprint of the administration's pre-ordained agenda that was yet to come. Were those oil companies and energy barons sitting there with Uncle Dick,... planning the partitioning of Iraq's oil resources? Sure they were.

----Would Jeff Skilling help us out now, in exchange for a little plea-bargaining? Are other Enron whistle-blowers in a position to shed some light on the meetings? Or on the energy-price rape of California? And looking into Halliburton's activities necessarily calls into question the actions of Cheney throughout the entire affair. We get to question the VP, and it isn't even about a contested constitutional issue. Convenient, eh?

----In fact, the Energy Panel meetings would likely afford a roadmap to virtually every rotten thing this administration has done since it took office. It is apart from the partisan security passions of lingering neocon dupes,... and it can be made to resonate with all the same folks who rejected the Social Security giveaway. Once the democrats secure an even greater percentage backing from the general electorate,.... THEN they can go on to bigger and better investigations. THEN the public will be ready to sit up straight and pay attention to the constitutional arguments which have to be made in contesting the usurpation of the executive branch.

----You have to walk before you can run. I hope the democrats remember this.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
alfredo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-06-06 07:48 PM
Response to Original message
1. So many crimes and so little time.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DUHandle Donating Member (580 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-06-06 07:51 PM
Response to Reply #1
4. So little time?
The business of the day should be a decade or more.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
alfredo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-07-06 05:28 AM
Response to Reply #4
7. I was thinking of what is left of bush's regime.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
musiclawyer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-06-06 07:49 PM
Response to Original message
2. kick
send your concept to Olbermann. Suggest he do a piece on the strategy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Parisle Donating Member (849 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-07-06 10:58 AM
Response to Reply #2
8. I'd do it,......
---- Can anyone tell me how to get in touch with ol' Keith? Might be fun. Can't be any more unsuccessful than I've been with sending ideas & verbiage to the Democratic Party.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dave502d Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-06-06 07:51 PM
Response to Original message
3. Good start, thank you. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
haymark Donating Member (128 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-06-06 07:59 PM
Response to Original message
5. So much fun
Can't wait to get started.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
smomfr Donating Member (227 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-06-06 08:16 PM
Response to Original message
6. A little bit off the subject but...........
what do you all think will happen to haliburton stock if Dems win big tomorrow?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 09:50 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC