Placebo
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Nov-07-06 09:10 PM
Original message |
shawmut
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Nov-07-06 09:11 PM
Response to Original message |
Cascadian
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Nov-07-06 09:11 PM
Response to Original message |
2. Does this mean he's going to claim Democrat again? n/t |
Roland99
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Nov-07-06 09:11 PM
Response to Original message |
BrainRants
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Nov-07-06 09:11 PM
Response to Original message |
MidMichiganBuckeye
(21 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Nov-07-06 09:12 PM
Response to Original message |
5. He will cacaus with us.... |
|
But hopefully they will not put him in any position of leadership if we take the senate.
|
Placebo
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Nov-07-06 09:13 PM
Response to Reply #5 |
9. If the leadership wants him to caucus with the Democrats... |
|
they'll let him retain his seniority.
|
madfloridian
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Nov-07-06 09:20 PM
Response to Reply #9 |
12. Anyone gloating here tonight does not understand that what Joe did |
|
was being a traitor to the Democratic process. And you sound like you are gloating.
Why are you doing that? Joe did not listen to the voters of his party, he abandoned them. Most of his support is Republican...don't piss on my leg and tell me it is raining. He will do what suits him and them.
|
Solon
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Nov-07-06 09:22 PM
Response to Reply #12 |
14. Anyone who says Lieberman wins when less than 10% of polls are reporting... |
|
Edited on Tue Nov-07-06 09:22 PM by Solon
have no fucking clue what they are talking about. It could still swing either way.
|
kenny blankenship
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Nov-07-06 09:42 PM
Response to Reply #9 |
24. And if they want Bush and the Repugs to know what they're planning |
|
they'll do as you suggest.
|
HiFructosePronSyrup
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Nov-07-06 09:12 PM
Response to Original message |
6. Meh. We'll get him next time. |
|
Unless some molested pages come forward first.
:shrug:
|
zulchzulu
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Nov-07-06 09:13 PM
Response to Original message |
7. C-SPAN has Lamont 58% to 39% for Loserdork... |
Solon
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Nov-07-06 09:13 PM
Response to Original message |
8. With 6% of precincts reporting, isn't that a little early? |
|
By the way, don't look too happy.
|
madfloridian
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Nov-07-06 09:15 PM
Response to Original message |
10. I never use the F word, but I am now. |
|
And don't gloat. Don't come here and gloat because he wins.
|
quiet.american
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Nov-07-06 09:16 PM
Response to Original message |
11. Sure, he'll caucus except when it really matters. |
|
Then he'll get that sanctimonious whine in his voice and kiss Bush's ass YET AGAIN.
|
graywarrior
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Nov-07-06 09:21 PM
Response to Original message |
Sparkly
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Nov-07-06 09:22 PM
Response to Original message |
15. Congratulations, Republicans. |
windbreeze
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Nov-07-06 09:24 PM
Response to Original message |
16. This is the most important one.... |
|
Lamont had better not lose this...come on Connecticut...do what's right.... wb
|
madfloridian
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Nov-07-06 09:25 PM
Response to Reply #16 |
17. Lamont would NOT have lost if Lieberman had done the right thing. |
Arugula Latte
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Nov-07-06 09:42 PM
Response to Reply #17 |
|
He should have committed hari kari.
|
ShortnFiery
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Nov-07-06 09:26 PM
Response to Original message |
18. Well in every election a little rain must fall :( |
|
I hope this TRAITOR doesn't score any leadership positions as his head's still seemingly up the RNC's ass. :thumbsdown:
|
Cascadian
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Nov-07-06 09:27 PM
Response to Original message |
19. What the hell were the undecideds thinking? |
|
Edited on Tue Nov-07-06 09:27 PM by Cascadian
What were they thinking? Well, all we can hope for is that Monkey Bush Boy gives Lieberman a cabinet seat in the next year then Lamont could try it again later.
Lieberman is such a brown noser! God! Connecticut could have done better!
John
|
NCarolinawoman
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Nov-07-06 09:54 PM
Response to Reply #19 |
27. NOoooo! Bush will make him SOD and we will have |
|
PERPETUAL WAR! This chickenhawk is an unrepentant NeoCon.
:nuke:
|
leftofthedial
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Nov-07-06 09:28 PM
Response to Original message |
20. the democrat and fake democrat between them |
Atman
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Nov-07-06 09:35 PM
Response to Original message |
21. THIS IS BULLSHIT! IT ISN'T BASED ON NUMBERS! |
|
When it was just announced on whatever the hell channel we're watching, it was explained that this particular call was not based on votes, rather on "a complex analysis of a variety of responses to questions asked of voters," or something like that. It was an aburd explanation. And remember, you people saying "YEAH! I HEARD ABXYZ CALLED IT, TOO!", they "they" behind "they called it for Joe" is all the same group...the five big news stations and a couple polling organization formed a consortium, and already have refused to allow John Conyers or anyone else to see any of the raw polling data. So if one network calls a race, ALL the networks have the exact same information. Don't let this distract you. Wait for them to report real final numbers.
.
|
OhNoTheyDidNot
(412 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Nov-07-06 09:37 PM
Response to Reply #21 |
22. I soooooooooooooooo hope you are right. I want that arse to gooooo away, far away |
Vadem
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Nov-07-06 09:44 PM
Response to Reply #21 |
26. I agree with you, but at least the polls are closed now, so they... |
|
have to count the damn votes!! There may still be a chance for Ned!!!! \
|
Clarkie1
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Nov-07-06 09:39 PM
Response to Original message |
23. Completely expected, unfortunately. nt |
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Wed Apr 24th 2024, 07:42 PM
Response to Original message |