ProSense
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Nov-07-06 09:28 PM
Original message |
babylonsister
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Nov-07-06 09:28 PM
Response to Original message |
1. Now I'm praying and I'm not religious. nt |
pissedoffprogressive
(322 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Nov-07-06 09:29 PM
Response to Original message |
2. Then shy are they projecting Liebergoof on MSNBC |
Canuckistanian
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Nov-07-06 09:30 PM
Response to Original message |
|
Connecticut Senate
Updated: 9:27 p.m. ET
Lieberman (Incumbent) 30,408 44%
Lamont 31,822 47%
|
Gregorian
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Nov-07-06 09:30 PM
Response to Original message |
4. If there's any justice... |
Lost-in-FL
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Nov-07-06 09:31 PM
Response to Original message |
Cascadian
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Nov-07-06 09:31 PM
Response to Original message |
6. I thought they just called it for Lieberman n/t |
Rose Siding
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Nov-07-06 09:31 PM
Response to Original message |
7. Why do they have it checked for Joe?! He's behind w/ only 10% reporting |
BlueManDude
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Nov-07-06 09:33 PM
Response to Original message |
8. Do not concede to that prick - make him fucking wait. |
Auntie Bush
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Nov-07-06 09:34 PM
Response to Original message |
9. But, but, but, I though Holy Joe was already the projected winner. |
graywarrior
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Nov-07-06 09:35 PM
Response to Original message |
10. I'm praying for the first time in my life |
caligirl
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Nov-07-06 09:49 PM
Response to Original message |
11. they called it based on exit polls, not the current vote tallies |
graywarrior
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Nov-07-06 09:49 PM
Response to Reply #11 |
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Tue Apr 23rd 2024, 02:58 AM
Response to Original message |