Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

The true victory was probably MUCH BIGGER

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Milo_Bloom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-08-06 03:48 PM
Original message
The true victory was probably MUCH BIGGER
Does anyone else believe that we won DESPITE a cheating effort? That the wave was large enough to overcome to the 2-3 % points of votes that were stolen?

I didn't pay too much attention to the exit polls, but the final results looked alot tighter than what I remember seeing yesterday. I didn't do screen captures, so maybe I am remembering wrong, but seeing the exit polls I thought, "This won't even be close"

I don't think the "base came back" to the GOP as many tried to claim last night... I think they managed to cheat enough to make a UBER PWNAGE look like just a landslide and solid defeats look like tight races and narrow defeats look like virtual ties.

I really REALLY Hope that one of the main things this congress focuses on is cleaning up the election process in this country.

PLEASE don't let the voting process get lost in the victory, we need to make sure future elections do not need landslide victories!

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
BattyDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-08-06 03:51 PM
Response to Original message
1. I honestly believe they tried to steal it, but they couldn't overcome the turnout.
Despite the polls, they were very arrogant and confident leading up to the election. It didn't make any sense ... unless they "knew" they had it in the bag.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wake.up.america Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-08-06 03:53 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. u got that right.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nadinbrzezinski Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-08-06 03:53 PM
Response to Original message
2. Correct
and their last two best hopes were MT and VA and the turnout was so big, they could NOT overcome it
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kenny blankenship Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-08-06 03:54 PM
Response to Original message
4. That looks very possible particularly in VA and MT
where the exit polls and tallied results are way out of whack compared to the smooth conformance between polling and results elsewhere.

Cheating in a decentralized system like the United States is a more a matter of a handful of individuals in county and state gov't taking matters into their own hands, than it is a "grand conspiracy" of top Party bosses and strategists working with corporate technicians.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
survivor999 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-08-06 03:58 PM
Response to Reply #4
9. I di dnot realize they were not in synch.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kenny blankenship Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-08-06 04:06 PM
Response to Reply #9
11. Exit poll data suggests clearer Dem wins like other Senate pickups
but the tallied election results in VA and MT show near ties. In the other Senate pickups for us the actual election result is within 1% of the exit polling projection. Tentative conclusion: VA and MT are only close because some Republicans in some counties and precincts were cheating. It's like when a murder suspect is guilty but the police plant evidence to make certain of a guilty verdict: the suspect can be guilty but also "framed". In this case, the GOP is cheating but still losing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
minerva50 Donating Member (229 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-08-06 04:42 PM
Response to Reply #11
17. I wish Allen really would demand a full investigation of the vote
but I suspect he will quickly fold his tent and go home for fear of exposing the cheating.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bonhomme Richard Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-08-06 03:54 PM
Response to Original message
5. If it were close they would have stollen it.
No Doubt at all. Hell, they did it at least twice.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lcordero2 Donating Member (832 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-08-06 03:55 PM
Response to Original message
6. !!!!!!!!
Edited on Wed Nov-08-06 03:58 PM by lcordero2
Try 5% and on top of that a voter suppression and intimidation campaign. With both, I think that 8%+ is a more reasonable estimate.

We truly need to dump these machines.

http://www.gregpalast.com/how-they-stole-the-mid-term-election#more-1530
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Iwasthere Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-08-06 03:55 PM
Response to Original message
7. Hackers chickened out with all the monitoring going on and...
Some just decided that they were on the wrong side and didn't go through with it. Enough of em just didn't come through for *. Bet he is steaming and wants some heads to roll.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nashville_brook Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-08-06 03:58 PM
Response to Original message
8. there was supression for sure, in addition to evidence of e-cheating
i don't think they were as effective in their e-cheating as they were in 2004
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DinahMoeHum Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-08-06 03:59 PM
Response to Original message
10. Check out the "Secretary of State Project". . .
http://www.secstateproject.org/candidate_oh.htm#

5 of the 8 endorsed candidates won the Secretary of State office. They're the overseers of elections.

And you can bet your ass these good folks are gonna clean up the elections process.

:kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
xxqqqzme Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-08-06 04:31 PM
Response to Reply #10
13. I can't believe Debra Bowen wasn't
on that list - She started making waves over e-voting when she was a State Senator. Thank goodness she won and we can get rid of that steroid boy appointed rethug mcpherson. Bowen even wants to change elections to Saturday & Sunday!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DinahMoeHum Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-08-06 04:37 PM
Response to Reply #13
15. They probably felt she was going to win anyway, and decided
to concentraten on lesser-known candidates. But believe me, they welcome her into their ranks of winners!!

:kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
colonel odis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-08-06 04:21 PM
Response to Original message
12. i agree. the real numbers were probably closer to bush's approval numbers.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
alcibiades_mystery Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-08-06 04:35 PM
Response to Original message
14. Oh STFU
Ridiculous.

One of the great results of this thing is that the stolen election crowd has been as discredited as the republicans.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Barack_America Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-08-06 04:39 PM
Response to Reply #14
16. Agreed...
Conspiracy theories = YAWN.

I guess now that the Dems are in power we'll have to start talking about something else.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Milo_Bloom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-08-06 04:51 PM
Response to Reply #14
18. How so?
Still looks pretty fishy from here? Exit polls in MT and VA did not jive with results and some congressional races look far closer than the pre-election polling suggested they would be.

GA-12, NM-1, OH-2, OH-15 indicated dem victories, but are now all too close to call.

OH-1 polling indicated a dem victory, but wound up as a 6 point loss.

ID-1 polling indicated a dem victory, but wound up as a 5 point loss.

Ignore this real issue at your own peril.

I gotta go with dailykos on what was posted yesterday, we NEED to work towards a better system for voting.

I am just damn glad that the democratic victory was significant enough to overcome the 2-3% of the vote that has been stolen in the last few elections.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ccpup Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-08-06 04:56 PM
Response to Reply #14
19. My, my ...
that was astonishingly Repuglican of you. If you check your Dem Handbook, you'll discover that, instead of talking in unison from an agreed upon playbook of talking points, we actually have our own opinions and allow others who disagree with us to have their say, whether we like what they share or not.

To do otherwise would be, well, Republican!

So, no, we won't STFU. Cheers! :toast:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
alcibiades_mystery Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-08-06 06:08 PM
Response to Reply #19
22. Anyone is perfectly allowed to say anything
Just as I am allowed to wish out loud that some people with their discredited nonsense would just, finally, shut the fuck up.

See how that works?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ccpup Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-08-06 07:22 PM
Response to Reply #22
27. yes, it's wonderful.
and I can respond by telling you to STFU. we can then shake hands and agree to disagree. ain't America grand?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
alcibiades_mystery Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-08-06 07:50 PM
Response to Reply #27
29. That's indeed how it works
I'm glad you were able to learn something through this episode.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ccpup Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-08-06 07:54 PM
Response to Reply #29
30. perhaps someday you will too
best of luck
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
alcibiades_mystery Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-08-06 08:03 PM
Response to Reply #30
32. perhaps I will
One day...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheWatcher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-08-06 05:04 PM
Response to Reply #14
20. Perhaps you should STFU
Edited on Wed Nov-08-06 05:04 PM by TheWatcher
Just because we won does not discredit anybody. If you watch the HBO Documentary Hacking Democracy, this never was a laughing matter, and you still have to account for what happened in 2002, and 2004.

I suppose now you wish everyone to just forget what happened there, like it never happened. WE WON'T. You aren't going to shut us up on this issue. You can insult and denigrate all you want, but the issue is NOT going away, so you had better learn to deal with it.

I agree with the assessment that the turn out was so large that there was no way they could steal it with the current infrastructure they have in place.

What we need to do know is GET RID of these damn machines so that they can't so something like they did the previous two elections.

As for you, as usual, you are a complete ass even in victory. Although you being on our side has always been a bit suspect.

Why am I not surprised.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
alcibiades_mystery Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-08-06 06:10 PM
Response to Reply #20
23. Oh, yes, sooooo suspect
Edited on Wed Nov-08-06 06:10 PM by alcibiades_mystery
Because I'm not lockstep on the lunatic train, I'm suspect. You'd make a good Stalinist, since we're trading personal insults. Little street corner commisar, evaluating the Party Purity of your neighbors and various neighborhood children.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rinsd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-08-06 05:05 PM
Response to Reply #14
21. .
:thumbsup:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ignis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-08-06 06:12 PM
Response to Reply #14
25. Right, who listens to that Greg Palast wacko, anyway?
Pull the other one, it's got bells on.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mr_Spock Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-08-06 08:16 PM
Response to Reply #14
33. .
:thumbsup: :kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
incapsulated Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-08-06 06:11 PM
Response to Original message
24. Keep Despair Alive!!
For fucks sake, this is sad.

No one here doesn't want the system reformed so it cannot be stolen.

But some of you won't be happy unless it IS, it seems.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rinsd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-08-06 06:27 PM
Response to Reply #24
26. LOL. The eyeores!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Vidar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-08-06 07:25 PM
Response to Original message
28. I agree.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
POAS Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-08-06 07:56 PM
Response to Original message
31. They misunderestimated the turnout.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 01st 2024, 04:44 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC