Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Obama is 7 points behind Hillary for 08

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
bigdarryl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-08-06 05:37 PM
Original message
Obama is 7 points behind Hillary for 08
Clinton 29% Obama 22% Gore 13% i don't think Gore's going to run so the question is where will that 13% go. Obama could take Hillary out.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
rocktivity Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-08-06 05:39 PM
Response to Original message
1. I think Obama would be the perfect VP
Especially if he paired up with Wes Clark.

:headbang:
rocknation
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AtomicKitten Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-08-06 05:40 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. or Gore
both excellent men!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rocktivity Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-08-06 05:46 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. Yes, Gore would be my second choice after Clark
Edited on Wed Nov-08-06 05:47 PM by rocknation
The point being, I think Obama would have an easier time becoming president if he spent the next four to eight years looking over a president's shoulder.

:headbang:
rocknation
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AtomicKitten Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-08-06 05:47 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. I agree.
:)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
joeprogressive Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-08-06 05:51 PM
Response to Reply #2
6. Agree w/ both of you
and add Feingold into the mix. Any combo of Clark/Obama/Gore/Feingold is tough to beat.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bigdarryl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-08-06 05:45 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. Why a VP this country isn't going to pick a woman running..
for president and her running mate is a african american. i think Obama will be the dem's best chance. i listened to Hillary give her victory speech and i am sorry she can't deliver a speech
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fujiyama Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-08-06 06:01 PM
Response to Reply #3
9. The speech was grating and incredibly difficult to listen to
I had to turn it off. Her tone just irritates me.

And I'm freakin pissed she spent 30 million dollars on her safe seat, when a lot of that money could have gone toward close House races.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MercutioATC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-08-06 05:53 PM
Response to Reply #1
7. No has-beens. No Kerry, no Clark, no Gore....not even Dr. Dean.
We have two years to make some up-and-comer a star.

We'd better get started...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Imagevision Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-08-06 06:04 PM
Response to Reply #7
11. Rockstars need only to apply...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sensitivity Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-08-06 06:09 PM
Response to Reply #11
13. Applications period ends in 6 months.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MercutioATC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-08-06 06:24 PM
Response to Reply #11
16. You get my drift. We need to find a candidate who APPEALS to people.
I'm not suggesting putting up just any rock star...I AM advocating considering the wisdom of creating the right rock star.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bucky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-08-06 06:32 PM
Response to Reply #11
18. Seger-Bono for '08?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mass Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-08-06 07:03 PM
Response to Reply #11
25. OK, let's run Springsteen, if it is what we need.
I prefer a president, but if we need a rockstar, let's run him.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-08-06 06:47 PM
Response to Reply #7
20. And when your 'star' blows it during the give and take of hard fought series of debates?
Edited on Wed Nov-08-06 06:53 PM by blm
Then what?

The GOP used to say Bush is the one because he is like a "rock star" wherever he goes (back in the 90s)

Like it or not, the Dem voters tend to actually vote depending on who dominates the debates, and at a certain point during the series it becomes obvious who is best prepared and competent.

Picking a 'star' now is silly and sophomoric unless you've seen how they operate over the course of a grueling campaign and debates.

2004 was the hardest situation for all the Dems who participated. Never before was there a GOP who controlled almost every aspect of the media. Think about the stuff that Bush1 and Clinton debated, and look at what the 2004 primary Dems were stuck with - - every voting issue was a serious matter at that point. There was no luxury of a pet issue.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MercutioATC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-08-06 07:01 PM
Response to Reply #20
23. We nominate the "non-rock-star" Kerry on 2004....how'd that work for us?
Wanna talk about somebody making horrible public statements???

Yes, Kerry is a good Dem. Yes, he's intelligent. Yes, he usually speaks competently...and sometimes he speaks brilliantly.

But when he blows it, he REALLY blows it.

..and that screwed us in 2004.

The VP is whatever the party wants to make them. They can be folksy. They can be sharp. They can be viscerally appealing. As long as they meet the Dem sniff test, I'd suggest that "viscerally appealing" will get us more mileage than other criteria.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-08-06 07:09 PM
Response to Reply #23
29. He never really blew it. The media lied to claim he did, a lie they can create about ANYONE.
Edited on Wed Nov-08-06 08:05 PM by blm
You think a rock star is not going to have a corrupt media editting him or blowing up the slightest faux pas into a scandal? Name that Dem who controls newsroom editting rooms.

You can take a thousand speeches and appearances by ANY Democrat and I doubt you can find one who makes fewer slips of the tongue than John Kerry. The Gore invented the internet lie was created from an awkwardly worded answer in an interview. BushInc pored over all his interviews to come up with that and they beat him mercilessly for a completely made up story.

It doesn't matter what you say, they'll choose ANYTHING to create a lie.

The people in 2004 saw a competent, presidential Democrat at the debates. The media did their best to distort it so Bush could get away with stealing it....yet again.

Did you really think that the few times Kerry misspoke or dropped a pronoun was anything serious? Especially compared to the DAILY FUCKEDUP wordings of the Bushboy?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-08-06 08:03 PM
Response to Reply #23
32. BTW secure the election process and most any Dem can win. Return the Fairness Doctrine and
any competent Democrat WILL WIN.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rocktivity Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-08-06 06:58 PM
Response to Reply #7
22. Without our own national noise machine, we can't build a candidate from scratch
Remember how the MSM pretty much ignored Kerry unless they were attacking him? We need people with built-in name recognition, and who can't be attacked for going with the Repubs before going against them. That's why Clark, Obama, and Dean are on top of my list.

:headbang:
rocknation
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mass Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-08-06 07:05 PM
Response to Reply #22
27. Dont worry. They will be attacked. We need to fix the media first.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Imagevision Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-08-06 05:58 PM
Response to Original message
8. Hillary and Obama, Obama will have no difficulties putting away Hil...
Gore & Kerry? been there, done that!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Thrill Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-08-06 06:02 PM
Response to Original message
10. Neither are going to win
its going to take someone like Evan Bayh
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sensitivity Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-08-06 06:06 PM
Response to Original message
12. any link?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Count Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-08-06 06:10 PM
Response to Reply #12
14. Maybe it's a poll where we can actually vote, and show whom we really want
so it has to be kept off limits...
or it's a MSM "here are your choices" kinds dealie, I don't want neither Hillary, nor Obama.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sensitivity Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-08-06 06:18 PM
Response to Original message
15. Maybe we can also figure out unity of leadership and policy for next
couple years.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bucky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-08-06 06:27 PM
Response to Original message
17. Oh please
This poll does not reflect well on my candidate, so obviously it sucks, is inaccurate and irrelevent, and focuses on the "horse race" over the substance of a campaign.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
USMA Dem Donating Member (13 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-08-06 06:41 PM
Response to Reply #17
19. So what about that Clark guy?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bucky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-08-06 07:18 PM
Response to Reply #19
30. Every poll that shows Clark in the lead is plausible. All that deny this are Rove's tricks.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlueManDude Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-08-06 06:49 PM
Response to Original message
21. They would both give back our House majority to the GOPers
Hillary would be a disaster beyond belief.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mass Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-08-06 07:02 PM
Response to Original message
24. May be we could see who will run and how things go.
When I look at the prognostic one year ago concerning the senate, I can see how these prognostications are fun, but meaningless.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mtnsnake Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-08-06 07:05 PM
Response to Original message
26. Unless some other magic bullet comes along, Obama will overtake her
and win the primaries I think. The guy has what it takes to play.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Catchawave Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-08-06 07:08 PM
Response to Original message
28. What's the source of your poll ?
Helps us poli-junkies keep score :D
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
politicasista Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-08-06 07:32 PM
Response to Original message
31. If we don't have paper trail ballots, none of this matters
Edited on Wed Nov-08-06 07:33 PM by politicasista
We also still have a GOP owned and controlled broadcast media, but people forget that too. flame me if you want. :hide:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 06:39 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC